Only in Call of Duty would they decide to introduce horseback riding when the franchise goes futuristic.
Joking aside, I've been dying for this franchise to switch it up a bit. Call of Duty4 was amazing, but then it felt like they just rehashed the formula for the next few games (didn't bother buying the latest Modern Warfare). I hope advanced technology allows for that instead of feeling like "buy the next game so you can prestige again and get a few new guns!"
But I'm all about the multiplayer. So I'll just wait until they drop a trailer for that before I get to excited, because let's be honest who cares about the campaign. Hopefully I'll get to ride a horse while sniping in a ghillie suit. :D
@texasdeathmatch: Crysis... I love you so much. I know the single player didn't have a stellar story and there were quite a few bugs, but, man, I had a blast.
@k4tzm4n: haha I only played Crysis 2. Wasn't really sure what was going on with the plot, but that's how I am with all games. But the game play was phenomenal, loved how it felt like a modern FPS except you're a f*cking super soldier.
Don't care about the campaign, multiplayer looks like it'll be ruined by futuristic weapons that'll shoot through walls and teleport across maps and Zombies never disappoints . . .
Anyone see 1:17? Looks like a mystery box light in the background.
@texasdeathmatch: The last CoD game I spent my money on was MW2.
Ouch bro, I haven't purchased a COD game since World at War, which was personally my favourite COD game.
Back to the topic at hand, Jeff over at Giantbomb wrote an article about the game and he said it goes pretty in depth compared to the other entries in the series. I'm waiting for more details of course, but I think Treyarch might actually make COD relevant again.
Log in to comment