Are lolicons pedophiles?

In most cases, yep. If you're 20+ and particularly fond of this bs there's something wrong in your mind.

"Its ok, she's not actually 9, she's hundreds of years old and only looks like she..."

Yes!

Japan honestly needs to stop this shit. It's pretty concerning.

Its actually kinda sad this guys exists tbh

Japan deserved those nukes.

In France, the drawing of lolicons is now illegal even in the private setting

If everyone agrees to condemn pedophile acts, there remains the question of the simple fantasy without acting out that we can see in particular in certain mangas. However, the reform of the French Penal Code dated August 5, 2013, toughening of the legislation in this area, has something to provoke debate. From now on, drawing a minor in an imaginary pornographic situation is punishable by a prison sentence of 5 years as well as a fine of 75,000 euros. And this, even if the sketch is not broadcast.

Lolicons are individuals fixated on young, generally prepubescent, girls. What else could they be but pedophiles ?

I look ten but I'm really an adult.. yeah fk that

Yes, they literally are kids in these anime

Not really.

Their basically like furries. Cringe weirdos that are ultimately mostly harmless.

Furries don't want to bang real life animals. And hopefully neither do lolicons or shotacons

“Preposterous she clearly isn’t real. How can I be a pedo when I’m just attracted to a drawing that definitely doesn’t resemble real children in any way. Your the pedo for thinking she looks like a kid”……………………….

Sincerely all the people who think lolis are not Pedo bait lol

@morghulis said:

T'was a joke.

No, Japan is justing taking our weird thoughts and making it an animation, so we don't have to do it ourselves in real life (*I'm not talking about me, particularly)

@morghulis: I mean if you couldn't tell that before, that's not a good sign.

Riiiiigght, not talking about you

If ur 18+ watching loli shit ur just weird asf and need to be on the watch

Yes

If it translates to real life then yes. But if you just like girls who look like Riley Reid then no

@antebellum: You're speaking for yourself. People who usually don't want to include themselves have those thoughts. Not all of us.

Shut up

I'm not hurt because it's not true at all. You don't have any proof, only speculation. go cry about it.

The prevalence of lolis in anime is disturbing.

I've heard of the word "lolicon" before but never really knew what it meant. Now that I know, I can honestly say that anyone who gets involved with that kind of crap deserves castration, and not just the men. It's disgusting behavior and revolting mentalities.

@baldur_odinson said:

I've heard of the word "lolicon" before but never really knew what it meant. Now that I know, I can honestly say that anyone who gets involved with that kind of crap deserves castration, and not just the men. It's disgusting behavior and revolting mentalities.

I wouldn't say that for everyone. Not all lolicon's fixations on lolis are sexual. For some it's the awww factor. Like some who's fixated on puppies and kittens. Though I would tend to stay away from both because it's not always easy to tell the difference.

Obviously.

Being attracted to a fictional character on the basis that they're prepubescent/immature looking makes you a pedophile. The realism aspect is irrelevant.

@jacdec: Bruh, i'm french, i tried to visit a regular hentai site a few months ago and got a government warning that i tried to view kiddy porn. Freaked me the fuck out.

I think it's retarded to be this harsh over drawings, but lolicon is creepy nonetheless.

@tenartsshu: See post 9

Nice story 10/10

@tenartsshu said:

Jesus. This is what gives anime culture a bad rap.

by definition no as pedos are defined as having attraction to kids or directly engaging in ''discourse'' with them. Lolicons suit nether definition so they are not pedos. Unless drawings now define as children which they do not

@bob74h:

French law is clear, drawing a minor in pornographic actions or attitudes for any reason is a crime. whether the drawing is published or not.

Im not french and why does their law matter over the literal meaning of the word pedophilia, Just because people from a different nation think something does not mean it's the same thing.

Pedophilia is defined as having attraction to minors and drawings are not minors so by definition lolicons are not pedos, The french can think contrary to literacy but that does not equate to them being right for doing so plus this is a english speaking forum so most certainly none of us live in qucbec or france. If we did we would be unable to function due to the language barrier anyways point being the french thinking a certain way means nothing and b they speak a different language as such have different meanings for things eg cousin in french is gendered

Duh.

Being attracted to adolescent fictional girls isn't pedophilia though, nor is it paraphilia.

I mean

I would like to say furries aren't as bad. . .I wouldn't want to diss them entirely, don't care for lolicons at all though.

there's only one right answer

They're one step away imo.

Damn I just realized in the bio... They're using that "She's actually a 3000+ year old" stuff lmao.

Not a lot of decent arguments against it.

I voted yes just to see what the results would be, and yeah I think we're all on the same page lol.