Personally, I'm gonna vote no. I think the first two are fine but completely forgettable, and I think that there's much better characters the MCU can focus on in the near future.
I would much rather see Ant-Man, Wasp, Hank Pym, and the rest of the supporting cast just become side characters in the other movies, like Hawkeye and Scarlet Witch have been throughout the franchise.
Only if they go all in and try to make it an awesome conclusion. Throw Taskmaster and maybe Whirlwind in there. Have Hank and Jan do something cool and important.oh and actually resolve that loose end involving Mitch Carson.
@avenging_x_bolt: The rumor is Taskmaster is supposed to be the lead villain in Black Widow. As for Ant-Man 3, it should have a slight tie in with Shang-Chi so they could just say Whirlwind and maybe Living Laser acquired their powers from the Makulan rings. Feige hinted that the Mandarin will be the villainous father of Shang-Chi.
I'd like to see a Wasp and Antman sequel that focuses on the Quantum Realm beings that Janet Van Dyne had mentioned and the city that was flashed in the deleted scene
@mrmonster: I think a Disney + release would be interesting but the budget for the last Ant Man movie was really high (nearing 200m) so it would have to be a theatrical release if Disney were going for it. Supporting characters in something Disney+ would be better than them getting a movie.
I am going to vote "no" even though I adore the first movie. The second felt a bit more-of-the-same in the same way that Thor The Dark World felt like a lesser version of the original. A third Ant-Man and the Wasp movie would need to be a radical departure similar to Thor Ragnarok. Iron-Man was great but the two sequels that followed were less innovative with each successive entry. As an Ant-Man fan, I don't need to see that happen again.
I'd actually prefer to see a limited Ant-Man and the Wasp sitcom on Disney+ next year. Gimme 8 to 10 half-hour episodes of that in 2020 and I'd be pleased as punch.
Log in to comment