Would you more accepting an non-binary superhero movie or homosexual superhero movie?

  • 78 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for hkesupermantis
hkesupermantis

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll Would you more accepting an non-binary superhero movie or homosexual superhero movie? (57 votes)

Non-Binary. 7%
Gay. 16%
Both are fine, the story good or not is more important. 77%
 • 
Avatar image for crimson_comet
Crimson_COMET

505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Id be fine with it, but to doing it with a comic character who fits the bill here would be the ideal manner to do it, rather than them taking a popular character and altering them to be 'modern'

It would be weird to have someone like Green Arrow just be gay and end up with a dude, rather than follow up with Black Canary. Its weird, because its a character who shouldnt had been impacted by it, when they coulda done it for someone else who woulda made more sense to be whatever sexual preference or identity they choose to follow.

Even some characters who aren't in relationships would be an odd choice too, someone like The Human Torch who loves himself some ladies, would be odd if he was changed.

Do it to the right character, and tell a good or entertaining story with them and it shouldnt be an issue.

Avatar image for teaganwallis193
teaganwallis193

845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As long as the plot is internally consistent, it's all good! 👌

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

I'm down for both. Just give me quality content.

Avatar image for king-ragnar
King-Ragnar

6798

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Give me a good story. I don't care if the lead character is into bestiality.

Avatar image for eslay03
eslay03

2198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@king-ragnar: Anybody remember the Disney classic Beauty and the Beast? I’m just sayin.

Avatar image for necromancer76
Necromancer76

5720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Necromancer76

I'm perfectly fine with this, as long as they don't change a pre-established character into a non-binary/homosexual character when said character wasn't before.

And obviously, the story has to be well-crafted. If the creator makes everything about the story revolve around the superhero's gender/sexual preference, then the story and plot could suffer.

For example, a story about a character who is straight and/or identifies as a man/woman doesn't revolve around that fact. It's just an attribute of the main character that can be expanded upon if the author feels it's necessary to make the overall story better.

Avatar image for heroesgold
heroesgold

1051

Forum Posts

80

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for nicolascagegod
NicolascageGOD

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By NicolascageGOD

Just like many users above me said , it depends whether the story and character itself are good.

Avatar image for harrynorine
HarryNorine

495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Avatar image for deactivated-5f0f7baf95e44
deactivated-5f0f7baf95e44

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Neither

Avatar image for og_guts
OG_Guts

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

I'm fine with it if it's established characters with good pairings like Wiccan & Hulking, but shit like Cap x Bucky you can keep in your fanfics

Avatar image for killbilly
KillBilly

5868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

As long as it's a good story that doesn't rely on political pandering to sell, go for it.

Avatar image for hkesupermantis
hkesupermantis

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@necromancer76:

I don’t know about gay but non binary is something you can become in some point of your life.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

Avatar image for harrynorine
HarryNorine

495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Okay, then why are you against gay or non-binary people being represented in a superhero film?

Avatar image for harrynorine
HarryNorine

495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By HarryNorine

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Okay, then why are you against gay or non-binary people being represented in a superhero film?

Some people just don't like pandering to a group and injecting non-binary/gay heroes into a film to satisfy the SJW/twitter mobs who wants social representation.

And u are making a lot of assumptions here. I just stated that an option for no/none should be included as not everyone would be be up for it. Having a choice and not being forced to follow a single ideal is something liberals need to get their heads around.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Okay, then why are you against gay or non-binary people being represented in a superhero film?

Some people just don't like pandering to a group and injecting non-binary/gay heroes into a film to satisfy the SJW/twitter mobs who wants social representation.

And u are making a lot of assumptions here. I just stated that an option for no/none should be included as not everyone would be be up for it. Having a choice and not being forced to follow a single ideal is something liberals need to get their heads around.

(1) So the mere presence of a gay/non-binary superhero amounts to nothing more than pandering to SJWs? The fact that this is even part of your argument is rather telling. You can't let them simply exist, it must be an attack on you, and a bit of pandering to SJWs, right? The fact that you rejected the third option "Both are fine, the story good or not is more important" is clearly indicative of the fact that for the people you're speaking of, it's in no way about SJW-pandering ruining the story. This option clearly states that it's about quality above all else, not about pandering to anyone. So if the problem really was SJW-pandering, you/the people you're speaking about would readily select this problem. The reality of it is (in the case of this discussion, with these possible options) that someone who claims that they don't want gay/non-binary representation because it's nothing more than SJW-pandering is simply bigoted towards gay/non-binary people.

(2) First of all, my assumption is based on the implications inherent in your initial comment. You didn't even address the actual discussion at hand, you just immediately subtly criticized the OP for not including an option that has, in general, rather bigoted and LGBT-phobic connotations to it. And moreover, it's not like you are being barred from commenting your opinion. In any case, did you consider the possibility that it simply didn't occur to the OP that some people would be actively in opposition to a gay or non-binary superhero?

Avatar image for harrynorine
HarryNorine

495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By HarryNorine

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Okay, then why are you against gay or non-binary people being represented in a superhero film?

Some people just don't like pandering to a group and injecting non-binary/gay heroes into a film to satisfy the SJW/twitter mobs who wants social representation.

And u are making a lot of assumptions here. I just stated that an option for no/none should be included as not everyone would be be up for it. Having a choice and not being forced to follow a single ideal is something liberals need to get their heads around.

(1) So the mere presence of a gay/non-binary superhero amounts to nothing more than pandering to SJWs? The fact that this is even part of your argument is rather telling. You can't let them simply exist, it must be an attack on you, and a bit of pandering to SJWs, right? The fact that you rejected the third option "Both are fine, the story good or not is more important" is clearly indicative of the fact that for the people you're speaking of, it's in no way about SJW-pandering ruining the story. This option clearly states that it's about quality above all else, not about pandering to anyone. So if the problem really was SJW-pandering, you/the people you're speaking about would readily select this problem. The reality of it is (in the case of this discussion, with these possible options) that someone who claims that they don't want gay/non-binary representation because it's nothing more than SJW-pandering is simply bigoted towards gay/non-binary people.

(2) First of all, my assumption is based on the implications inherent in your initial comment. You didn't even address the actual discussion at hand, you just immediately subtly criticized the OP for not including an option that has, in general, rather bigoted and LGBT-phobic connotations to it. And moreover, it's not like you are being barred from commenting your opinion. In any case, did you consider the possibility that it simply didn't occur to the OP that some people would be actively in opposition to a gay or non-binary superhero?

And there it is the liberal/SJW.

Just for criticizing the OP in not including an option for those who would be against either.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Okay, then why are you against gay or non-binary people being represented in a superhero film?

Some people just don't like pandering to a group and injecting non-binary/gay heroes into a film to satisfy the SJW/twitter mobs who wants social representation.

And u are making a lot of assumptions here. I just stated that an option for no/none should be included as not everyone would be be up for it. Having a choice and not being forced to follow a single ideal is something liberals need to get their heads around.

(1) So the mere presence of a gay/non-binary superhero amounts to nothing more than pandering to SJWs? The fact that this is even part of your argument is rather telling. You can't let them simply exist, it must be an attack on you, and a bit of pandering to SJWs, right? The fact that you rejected the third option "Both are fine, the story good or not is more important" is clearly indicative of the fact that for the people you're speaking of, it's in no way about SJW-pandering ruining the story. This option clearly states that it's about quality above all else, not about pandering to anyone. So if the problem really was SJW-pandering, you/the people you're speaking about would readily select this problem. The reality of it is (in the case of this discussion, with these possible options) that someone who claims that they don't want gay/non-binary representation because it's nothing more than SJW-pandering is simply bigoted towards gay/non-binary people.

(2) First of all, my assumption is based on the implications inherent in your initial comment. You didn't even address the actual discussion at hand, you just immediately subtly criticized the OP for not including an option that has, in general, rather bigoted and LGBT-phobic connotations to it. And moreover, it's not like you are being barred from commenting your opinion. In any case, did you consider the possibility that it simply didn't occur to the OP that some people would be actively in opposition to a gay or non-binary superhero?

And there it is the liberal/SJW.

And there it is, the logical fallacy when he has no serious counter-argument.

Try again, if you will, or simply accept that what you said indicated bigotry and anti-LGBT sentiment. This was never about SJW-pandering, it was about you hating on identities you don't like.

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Right, so we're cucks because you guys are too prude for anal? Lol, alright...

Avatar image for harrynorine
HarryNorine

495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23  Edited By HarryNorine

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Okay, then why are you against gay or non-binary people being represented in a superhero film?

Some people just don't like pandering to a group and injecting non-binary/gay heroes into a film to satisfy the SJW/twitter mobs who wants social representation.

And u are making a lot of assumptions here. I just stated that an option for no/none should be included as not everyone would be be up for it. Having a choice and not being forced to follow a single ideal is something liberals need to get their heads around.

(1) So the mere presence of a gay/non-binary superhero amounts to nothing more than pandering to SJWs? The fact that this is even part of your argument is rather telling. You can't let them simply exist, it must be an attack on you, and a bit of pandering to SJWs, right? The fact that you rejected the third option "Both are fine, the story good or not is more important" is clearly indicative of the fact that for the people you're speaking of, it's in no way about SJW-pandering ruining the story. This option clearly states that it's about quality above all else, not about pandering to anyone. So if the problem really was SJW-pandering, you/the people you're speaking about would readily select this problem. The reality of it is (in the case of this discussion, with these possible options) that someone who claims that they don't want gay/non-binary representation because it's nothing more than SJW-pandering is simply bigoted towards gay/non-binary people.

(2) First of all, my assumption is based on the implications inherent in your initial comment. You didn't even address the actual discussion at hand, you just immediately subtly criticized the OP for not including an option that has, in general, rather bigoted and LGBT-phobic connotations to it. And moreover, it's not like you are being barred from commenting your opinion. In any case, did you consider the possibility that it simply didn't occur to the OP that some people would be actively in opposition to a gay or non-binary superhero?

And there it is the liberal/SJW.

And there it is, the logical fallacy when he has no serious counter-argument.

Try again, if you will, or simply accept that what you said indicated bigotry and anti-LGBT sentiment. This was never about SJW-pandering, it was about you hating on identities you don't like.

Jesus christ you are just as bad as those people in cancel culture. Be right back you get triggered because someone criticizes OP for not including an option for those who would want neither. Makes bold claims and start forming your own narrative/background of their intention and paint a characteristics of them that suits what you think of anyone questioning LGBT related topics. Are you gay? Do you feel this is a personal attack on you that is why you got triggered? I'm not attacking LGBT, just using common logic and consideration for people that have a difference of opinion and stating that the options should be more diverse to include them, even if they may not align up with mainstream thinking/WOK culture.

Loading Video...

Liberals = no freedom of speech unless it aligns with my ideals.

Avatar image for teaganwallis193
teaganwallis193

845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Laugh my f@#$!ng arse off!

Avatar image for teaganwallis193
teaganwallis193

845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Right, so we're cucks because you guys are too prude for anal? Lol, alright...

Also, many heterosexual engage in anal copulation.

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By TurtleTortoise

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Right, so we're cucks because you guys are too prude for anal? Lol, alright...

Leftist cuck: Christians are so dumb when they worship God, we transcended all that.

Normal person: What's ur favourite topic?

Leftist cuck: Butt sex

Normal person: Don't you think that's demented?

Leftist cuck: No, kids need sex ed & propaganda to learn about butt sex

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By TurtleTortoise

@teaganwallis193 said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Right, so we're cucks because you guys are too prude for anal? Lol, alright...

Also, many heterosexual engage in anal copulation.

Some even golden shower on each other, let's create 1st superhero who showers on Captain Marvel

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@harrynorine said:

How come you did not even bother to include a no option?

Because it's 2020 and most people don't hate gay or non-binary people.

But you can still be against not wanting either without hate though. Its 2020 and we should accept whatever isn't an argument either.

Okay, then why are you against gay or non-binary people being represented in a superhero film?

Some people just don't like pandering to a group and injecting non-binary/gay heroes into a film to satisfy the SJW/twitter mobs who wants social representation.

And u are making a lot of assumptions here. I just stated that an option for no/none should be included as not everyone would be be up for it. Having a choice and not being forced to follow a single ideal is something liberals need to get their heads around.

(1) So the mere presence of a gay/non-binary superhero amounts to nothing more than pandering to SJWs? The fact that this is even part of your argument is rather telling. You can't let them simply exist, it must be an attack on you, and a bit of pandering to SJWs, right? The fact that you rejected the third option "Both are fine, the story good or not is more important" is clearly indicative of the fact that for the people you're speaking of, it's in no way about SJW-pandering ruining the story. This option clearly states that it's about quality above all else, not about pandering to anyone. So if the problem really was SJW-pandering, you/the people you're speaking about would readily select this problem. The reality of it is (in the case of this discussion, with these possible options) that someone who claims that they don't want gay/non-binary representation because it's nothing more than SJW-pandering is simply bigoted towards gay/non-binary people.

(2) First of all, my assumption is based on the implications inherent in your initial comment. You didn't even address the actual discussion at hand, you just immediately subtly criticized the OP for not including an option that has, in general, rather bigoted and LGBT-phobic connotations to it. And moreover, it's not like you are being barred from commenting your opinion. In any case, did you consider the possibility that it simply didn't occur to the OP that some people would be actively in opposition to a gay or non-binary superhero?

And there it is the liberal/SJW.

And there it is, the logical fallacy when he has no serious counter-argument.

Try again, if you will, or simply accept that what you said indicated bigotry and anti-LGBT sentiment. This was never about SJW-pandering, it was about you hating on identities you don't like.

Jesus christ you are just as bad as those people in cancel culture. Be right back you get triggered because someone critizes OP for not including an option for those who would want neither. Makes bold claims and start forming your own narrative/background of their intention and paint a characteristics of them that suits what you think anyone questioning LGBT community. Are you gay? Do you feel this is a personal attack on you that is why you got triggered? I'm not attacking LGBT, just using common logic that people have difference of opinion and options should be more diverse to include those even if they may not align up with mainstream thinking/WOK culture.

Loading Video...

Liberals = no freedom of speech unless it aligns with my ideals.

I got triggered? I just poked a few holes in your argument and outlined how you were sounding. You're the one who started throwing around ad hominem and have now written a long, angry, rambling response with little structure or logical progression. Not gonna lie, buddy, it seems like you're the one getting upset.

And I'm not gay. I'm bisexual. But that's really not what this is about. I don't feel offended by what some faceless, nameless random says on the internet unless they're actively inciting hatred/fear/violence, which you aren't doing.

And it's not "woke culture" to care more about the quality of the story than who is represented. That's what I think is the best and most impartial answer. It's certainly the one I selected, because it clearly reflects the fact that the quality of the story is more important. Being actively against the LGBT community is bigotry. It's as simple as that, mate, whether you like it or not.

You're free to say whatever you want. I support your right to say whatever you want (as long as you aren't inciting hatred/fear/violence), but you need to recognize that when you say something, people who have a different opinion to you, might criticize you. You're not being cancelled. You're not being mobbed. Your arguments are simply being criticized.

It's ironic that conservatives like yourself often say liberals have adopted a permanent victim-mentality, when, in actuality, you guys fly off the handle and claim "cancel culture" whenever your ideas are criticized.

It's just the internet, and I'm just some random stranger that's telling you your ideas are bad. Nobody's cancelling you. Nobody's coming to get you.

Get over yourself, honey.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Right, so we're cucks because you guys are too prude for anal? Lol, alright...

Leftist cuck: Christians are so dumb when they worship God, we transcended all that.

Normal person: What's ur favourite topic?

Leftist cuck: Butt sex

Normal person: Don't you think that's demented?

Leftist cuck: No, kids need sex ed & propaganda to learn about butt sex

So my favourite topic is butt sex? That's interesting, because the person who started talking about butt sex was... the Christian conservative.

Lol. You are a hilarious creature, Turt.

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30  Edited By TurtleTortoise
Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:

So my favourite topic is butt sex?

@wolverinebatmanftw said:

I'm down for both.

So your only rebuttal is to take two of my totally separate quotes, and lump them together without context?

Awesome, dude. You're so smart.

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By TurtleTortoise

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:

So my favourite topic is butt sex?

@wolverinebatmanftw said:

I'm down for both.

So your only rebuttal is to take two of my totally separate quotes, and lump them together without context?

Awesome, dude. You're so smart.

u say u're down for gays & non binaries. Those are butt sex practitioners? Try again.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:

So my favourite topic is butt sex?

@wolverinebatmanftw said:

I'm down for both.

So your only rebuttal is to take two of my totally separate quotes, and lump them together without context?

Awesome, dude. You're so smart.

u say u're down for gays & non binaries. Those are butt sex practitioners? Try again.

So straight people don't ever have anal sex? Lol, okay.

Also, it's amusing that you think that being LGBT amounts to nothing more than anal sex.

And once again, who started talking about anal sex?

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

That's right, you. Nobody else. Just you. You clearly have some kind of obsession/fascination with it. Don't feel bad. There's nothing wrong with it, regardless of whatever regressive beliefs have been drilled into your mind.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@baldur_odinson

I'm curious, what's your take on this?

And no, I'm not trying to bait you into bickering or anything. Just asking.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for spinach
Spinach

2244

Forum Posts

39

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

no

Avatar image for saitamaichiban
SaitamaIchiban

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

YES.

YAAAAAAAS

: )

Avatar image for kryptonianking88
KryptonianKing88

4946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

There should be a “no” option and no.

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:

So my favourite topic is butt sex?

@wolverinebatmanftw said:

I'm down for both.

So your only rebuttal is to take two of my totally separate quotes, and lump them together without context?

Awesome, dude. You're so smart.

u say u're down for gays & non binaries. Those are butt sex practitioners? Try again.

So straight people don't ever have anal sex? Lol, okay.

Also, it's amusing that you think that being LGBT amounts to nothing more than anal sex.

And once again, who started talking about anal sex?

@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

That's right, you. Nobody else. Just you. You clearly have some kind of obsession/fascination with it. Don't feel bad. There's nothing wrong with it, regardless of whatever regressive beliefs have been drilled into your mind.

U say I'm prude, if u like it so much more than traditionalism then admit ur fascination with butt sex

Avatar image for baldur_odinson
Baldur_Odinson

1898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By Baldur_Odinson

@wolverinebatmanftw: I agree with HarryNorine for the most part, but I chose either being fine so long as the story is good. For example, I'm re-watching Xena: Warrior Princess, which has lesbian scenes that I'm okay with, because the series has a story and setting that I enjoy.

Avatar image for byondeon
byondeon

7840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 byondeon  Online

I would love a non-binary lesbian Monica Rambeau

Avatar image for last0fth3risen
last0fth3risen

951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Both are fine, as long as the character's entire identity does not revolve around this one aspect.

Avatar image for comic_book_fan
comic_book_fan

14375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

whats with all of the anal talk lol i just came down here to put my talk and noticed alot of it lol.

anyway i don't care if a you create a new character who is gay or a character who is already gay or on the line like if you wanted to make a midnighter movie or make mystique or daken gay in a movie fine no problem i just hate when they do this with characters who have decades of history and it's well established then you just change it for shock or attention without a real reason like with iceman i didn't see the point in making him gay i mean iam not angry about it but i understand if someone was because it's a pointless change just done for attention but i think there are plenty of gay characters they have to work with no need to change anyone for that effect

Avatar image for teaganwallis193
teaganwallis193

845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@teaganwallis193 said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

Right, so we're cucks because you guys are too prude for anal? Lol, alright...

Also, many heterosexual engage in anal copulation.

Some even golden shower on each other, let's create 1st superhero who showers on Captain Marvel

Jesus Christ

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:

So my favourite topic is butt sex?

@wolverinebatmanftw said:

I'm down for both.

So your only rebuttal is to take two of my totally separate quotes, and lump them together without context?

Awesome, dude. You're so smart.

u say u're down for gays & non binaries. Those are butt sex practitioners? Try again.

So straight people don't ever have anal sex? Lol, okay.

Also, it's amusing that you think that being LGBT amounts to nothing more than anal sex.

And once again, who started talking about anal sex?

@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

That's right, you. Nobody else. Just you. You clearly have some kind of obsession/fascination with it. Don't feel bad. There's nothing wrong with it, regardless of whatever regressive beliefs have been drilled into your mind.

U say I'm prude, if u like it so much more than traditionalism then admit ur fascination with butt sex

I'm fine with both.

But that's not what we're here to talk about. All we're here to talk about is the inclusion of gay/non-binary people in superhero media. Yet you keep on talking about anal sex. Just non-stop. You really are obsessed with anal, aren't you?

Maybe you're gay, and have just repressed it all because your religious/ideological views won't allow for LGBT+ people, so it's making ya dial up the internalized homophobia? Nothing wrong with it if that's the case.

Avatar image for wolverinebatmanftw
WolverineBatmanFTW

6727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

@wolverinebatmanftw: I agree with HarryNorine for the most part, but I chose either being fine so long as the story is good. For example, I'm re-watching Xena: Warrior Princess, which has lesbian scenes that I'm okay with, because the series has a story and setting that I enjoy.

Fair enough.

Another question -- do you think that if a 'no' option was added, picking that over the option of "I don't care as long as the story is good" constitutes bigotry towards LGBT+ people?

Avatar image for baldur_odinson
Baldur_Odinson

1898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47  Edited By Baldur_Odinson

@wolverinebatmanftw: Not really, no, because anyone can give any non-bigoted reason to choose it. I think it adds a bit more fairness to the choices.

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

just change it for shock or attention without a real reason like with iceman i didn't see the point in making him gay

they made alan scott gay, he has two kids and they made him gay.

Avatar image for comic_book_fan
comic_book_fan

14375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@comic_book_fan said:

just change it for shock or attention without a real reason like with iceman i didn't see the point in making him gay

they made alan scott gay, he has two kids and they made him gay.

that is really stupid and a perfect example of what iam talking about

Avatar image for turtletortoise
TurtleTortoise

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:
@turtletortoise said:
@wolverinebatmanftw said:

So my favourite topic is butt sex?

@wolverinebatmanftw said:

I'm down for both.

So your only rebuttal is to take two of my totally separate quotes, and lump them together without context?

Awesome, dude. You're so smart.

u say u're down for gays & non binaries. Those are butt sex practitioners? Try again.

So straight people don't ever have anal sex? Lol, okay.

Also, it's amusing that you think that being LGBT amounts to nothing more than anal sex.

And once again, who started talking about anal sex?

@turtletortoise said:

What's a leftist cuck?

Someone who instead of doing something productive debates butt sex in mass media.

Is that it?

They also accuse christians for not supporting butt sex.

That's right, you. Nobody else. Just you. You clearly have some kind of obsession/fascination with it. Don't feel bad. There's nothing wrong with it, regardless of whatever regressive beliefs have been drilled into your mind.

U say I'm prude, if u like it so much more than traditionalism then admit ur fascination with butt sex

I'm fine with both.

But that's not what we're here to talk about. All we're here to talk about is the inclusion of gay/non-binary people in superhero media. Yet you keep on talking about anal sex. Just non-stop. You really are obsessed with anal, aren't you?

Maybe you're gay, and have just repressed it all because your religious/ideological views won't allow for LGBT+ people, so it's making ya dial up the internalized homophobia? Nothing wrong with it if that's the case.

I'm as pure as a baby when it comes to gay stuff.

Why do you want butt sex in media? If character is gay, but he never mentions it then who cares, but u want butt sex on the forefront, u want butt sex partners holding hands.