Why MCU Thor is bullet proof

Its hilarious how in the previous page there is a gif of Sif's shield no selling bullets but people are arguing that Thor would get killed by bullets because of an unquantifiable alien fired arrow weapon that pierced straight through Sif's shield but never hit Thor.

Is that Tyger dude on it again, assuming alien and Asgardian weapons stated to be far superior to terrestrial technology are not better than guns or..... arrows?

None of those feats are that impressive tbh. Better to just scale him from Hulk and Iron Man . . .

And that knife feat is still dumb . . .

@amcu: Don't you know that any random thug with a 9mm can kill the God of Thunder?

@totallynotjucas: Salty Dceu wank God

Of course. That would only be logical.

Thor is kamehamehasexymcuwankallmightygodtremblebeforemeinfiniteultrahyperultrathorversal tie +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

He’s not as resistant to bullets as Black Widow through feats.

Black widow tanked winter soldiers bullet and Thor hasn’t tanked any therefore black widow is more resistant to bullets that Thor.

?

@totallynotjucas: Best not pay attention to that guy. He's mentally stunned.

We can always assume but never prove

Using that logic, DCEU Superman's not bulletproof either.

Tbh, we can just assume he is, at least for small caliber rounds.

I’m going to say he is, but I don’t have a problem with people saying he isn’t. The only problem I have is the logic or lack there of that gets used in these types of threads. Lol he’s not because he ducked or moved. I guess I can knock Thor out with a medicine ball cause that basically happens in Thor 3...

I just hope people remember threads/arguments like these when they say feats can not be transferred between kryptonians...

@jedixman: Nah, Bro. But, Based on LoL Vine Logic Black Widow can tank hits from Hulk cause that happened.

@TheGrat1: yea.....not gonna happen

@jedixman said:

I'm going to need you to prove that those bullets actually hit Thor, otherwise, they just all missed

@kevd4wg: Thor bullet timer confirmed

X

No, the bullets magically got swerved away by DCEU Superman, come on now

@kevd4wg: Right, I forgot, all Feats for Thor are actually anti feats

X

@tyger said:

If Thor was bullet proof then Sif wouldn't have needed to shield him from an ARROW FIRED FROM A GUN:

Thor also wouldn't have been shown on TWO SEPARATE occasions to avoid bullets.

She didn't. Thor got shot anyways a second later.

And laser guns aren't really the same as bullets. Loki is outright bulletproof, and yet he still opted to go for cover.

That's more like it

A fight, we can both agree, he was losing.

@kevd4wg: that same quinjet shot at and missed black widow

@totallynotjucas: crap not you sorry

The bullets from Ultron did not hit Thor on panel, maybe those missed.

As for the topic itself. Thor by feats has little to none decent piercing feats. But for me he should atleast be durable enough to tank small type of gunfire like pistols, rifles etc. I mean if anyone remember when Thor was in Quills ship, Gamora said thors muscles are made of some type of crap. Dont remember exact name, but she said that type of muscle fibers are tougher than steel. Small gunfire can pierce steel only if its extremely thin material. Not to mention casual asgardians can tank small gunfire. Loki who is nowhere near Thor level tanked gunfire.

So surely Thor would pretty casually tank bullets. Based on the sole fact that Gamora stated that his muscles are tougher than steel is more thank good enough to tank small gunfire. Not sure how it would do like high caliber gunfire, but small caliber bullets would probably do nothing to him. Maybe if he was shot in the eye it would harm him. Otherwise i dont think-

@supermanforever:

As for the topic itself. Thor by feats has little to none decent piercing feats.

Thor casually tanked being exposed to crystals that were moving at FTL speeds. And those same crystals instantly decap'd a massive dragon earlier in the movie. That's way beyond the piercing power (and speed) of any bullets.

There's also this:

We don't need to use scaling to say that Thor is bullet proof. He has the feats. The only reason we don't have a clear-cut example of him tanking a bullet is because Thor doesn't fight gun-wielding enemies. He has much bigger fish to fry.

@scipio123: only the initial impact of bifrost causes decapitation. If what you claim was true, loki and all the other asgardians that have walked out while the bifrost was on would have been cut in half. The second gif is irrelevant, Diana was also in an explosion with lots of grenades and didn't get a scratch on her and you know she has shit piercing resistance.

@DammeFavour: I know you're a troll so I won't feed you.

@scipio123: oh because everything I said matches up with what happened in the movies, the rune patterns on impact, the car getting cut in half upon bifrost impact in TDW, the dragon getting beheaded on impact.

We've had loki thrown out of the bifrost wall intact, asgardian soldiers walking out of the bifrost after bor stole the aether, bor himself walking out of it.

So I've listed examples of the bifrost only cutting things on its initial impact and examples of it having no effect on anything beyond initial impact and it completely lines up with events of the movie but I'm the troll heh? Hilarious

@DammeFavour: Well, against my better judgment, here goes...

oh because everything I said matches up with what happened in the movies, the rune patterns on impact, the car getting cut in half upon bifrost impact in TDW, the dragon getting beheaded on impact.

You're argument here makes less than no sense. The Bifrost is one continuous beam, made up of the same energy. There's no evidence to suggest that one part of the beam is randomly more powerful than the rest of it.

We've had loki thrown out of the bifrost wall intact

?

Loki is bulletproof. This is not an anti-feat. Also, Loki wasn't held in the beam for several seconds like Thor was.

asgardian soldiers walking out of the bifrost

Even fodder Asgardians can catch and crush knives with their bare hands without any injury.

bor himself walking out of it

Bor was the freaking King of Asgard, as well as the father of Odin and the grandfather of Thor. How is this a low-showing?

but I'm the troll heh?

Yes you are.

So many people not paying the troll toll

Tbh, Thor bullet timing isn’t a good feat for him.

Its a bad feat for the bullet.

Must’ve been mach 0.5 bullets imo.

@ourmanuel: You know, I bet someone would actually make that argument

X

Best comment here. Although can't an argument be made that pre-rag thor is less durable than post-rag thor?

Some people won't be satisfied until they see Thor no sell a bullet to the face. Even then they'll say he only has small caliber bullet resistance.

While I understand your frustration couldn't the same thing be said about Diana? We only saw her get injured by a bullet once so far but since then she has become more powerful. These are different universes from the comics so durability feats and weaknesses don't necessarily translate over i.e. maybe Thor is weak to pierce attacks like Diana from the comics or maybe Dceu Diana is bullet proof like thor in the comics?

I simply refuse to believe that a guy that can survive this isn't bulletproof:

Everyone claiming that Thor isn't bulletproof has to now state that a regular human could survive exposure to a beam with piercing power sufficient to instantly decapitate a massive, crust-busting dragon.

Apparently, human durability>>>>>>>>>>>dragon durability

@scipio123 said:

@supermanforever:

As for the topic itself. Thor by feats has little to none decent piercing feats.

Thor casually tanked being exposed to crystals that were moving at FTL speeds. And those same crystals instantly decap'd a massive dragon earlier in the movie. That's way beyond the piercing power (and speed) of any bullets.

There's also this:

We don't need to use scaling to say that Thor is bullet proof. He has the feats. The only reason we don't have a clear-cut example of him tanking a bullet is because Thor doesn't fight gun-wielding enemies. He has much bigger fish to fry.

Lol those are decent piercing feats? LMFAO:

Casual asgardians were no selling that rainbow bridge light. Nothing special at all.

@supermanforever: Actually, that’s incorrect. The Bifrost damages things when it is transferring someone from one place back to Asgard, but it appears that when they are transferred from Asgard to somewhere else, they are unharmed. This makes sense because one of them would be telporting part of their body somewhere else while the other one is not

Thor survived the one that was teleporting him somewhere which is the one that deals damage. The Asgardians were not be teleported anywhere by going through the beam, because they had already landed and the Bifrost was not taking them back to Asgard

X

@supermanforever: As I said above, even fodder Asgardians have sufficient feats to prove that they're bullet-proof. And none of those Asgardians were exposed to the beam for anywhere near as long as Thor was.

Do you honestly believe a regular human could survive exposure to the Bifrost beam?

Baring in mind that it did this:

You're essentially arguing that regular humans have better piercing durability than a huge-ass dragon that was powerful enough that Thor didn't want to fight it.

@xzone: Good point.

But apparently ordinary humans have better durability than massive dragons lol.

@scipio123 said:

@supermanforever: As I said above, even fodder Asgardians have sufficient feats to prove that they're bullet-proof. And none of those Asgardians were exposed to the beam for anywhere near as long as Thor was.

Do you honestly believe a regular human could survive exposure to the Bifrost beam?

Baring in mind that it did this:

You're essentially arguing that regular humans have better piercing durability than a huge-ass dragon that was powerful enough that Thor didn't want to fight it.

When did i say asgardians were not bullet proof. Also prove the durability of that dragon. What makes you think its something decent?

Literaly nothing suggests from that thing, that tanking that light is something special. How do we even quantify. I explained before that i believe Thor is bullet proof. But for me tanking some shrapnel and that light thing is nothing special.

It just seems a little silly to me that just because we don't strictly see a bullet hit Thor people say he can't take one, when he's resisted piercing from the bi-frost amongst other showings by himself and other Asgardians.

I guess you could make that argument about DCEU Diana but she's historically shown weakness to bullets while Thor hasn't (I know comics do not equal movies but this seems like it carries over) and she goes out of her way to block them with her bracelets. There's also the fact that Amazonians have no piercing resistance. Diana is no regular Amazonian, but at the same time, Thor is no regular Asgardian. Logically, she should be durable enough to handle them but I wouldn't bet on it based on how she's been portrayed.