@mr_shazam0920 said:
Because they don’t care about destruction porn or “muh featz” they care about the personality and likability of their characters.
It's possible to have it both ways though. One doesn't cancel out the other.
Thats accurate, I agree, though one is naturally a bigger priority and concern for film creators and the general and wider public, and the other is usually a byproduct of having to distinguish between certain characters powers and giving characters a niche, for that same audience. With speed specifically, Flash has always been a lot more relevant (and integrated into JL) than Quicksilver (and his relationship to Avengers), and usually more powerful as well. When power creep and writer inconsistency and other creative techniques/issues are added, you start to get examples that move left and right of center.
If Quicksilver or Makkari ever became huge and relevant in comics, team movies, where they could potentially hold their own solo movie? Started appearing alongside Hulk, Thor, Iron Man, Cap as peers etc not only would more speed scenes be thrown in (with a byproduct of this being feats) but interactions with other characters, would also be creatively considered and not necessarily portrayed as one sided (with a byproduct either being feats for other characters too, or criticism of writing, or both)
Alternatively there are some powerful characters that rarely if ever show "speed feats" because they don't really "need" to. If an entity can be affected on some tangible level, then they can/'should' be affected by the consequences of speed applied. Like say Galactus, except Galactus conflicts never really involve speed, but why? Well, creatively speaking, an identifiable and pronounced characteristic of Galactus is his massive, majestic, lumbering, presence. Power! One basic arm/film technique when portraying such size and power, is to actually slow the characters animation down, (and a few other tricks, like birds for scale!!) to convey that sheer size and scope.
Most comic writers and probably most creators concerned with comic to movie adaptations, don't really care about portraying speed realistically. Then those that do... often screw up, and use technical or scientific language or principles wrong - but it might sound cool so... also, they usually don't try and flip the entire established hierarchy upside. Characters in their stories just get readjusted or rebalanced stylistically. Oh and again, its not about them not wanting to portray powers, thats huge in the superhero genre, but its character and quality rooted. Fox's Quicksilver's speed was probably thought of purely in terms of his iconic scenes and then the characters abilities conformed to that - its not like they sat around and vetoed cool scene ideas because "realistically the character isn't that fast enough to do that according to the powers we imagined" ditto conversations about how he would interact with others.
Log in to comment