@emorytoss17: There are absolutely degrees of omnipotence.
There is something known as the "Omnipotence Paradox" in philosophy.
A common modern version of the omnipotence paradox is expressed in the question: "Can [an omnipotent being] create a stone so heavy that it cannot lift it?" This question generates a dilemma. The being can either create a stone which it cannot lift, or it cannot create a stone which it cannot lift. If the being can create a stone that it cannot lift, then it seems that it can cease to be omnipotent. If the being cannot create a stone which it cannot lift, then it seems it is already not omnipotent.
A common response from Christian philosophers, such as Norman Geisler or Richard Swinburne is that the paradox assumes a wrong definition of omnipotence. Omnipotence, they say, does not mean that God can do anything at all but, rather, that he can do anything that's possible according to his nature. The distinction is important. God cannot perform logical absurdities; he cannot, for instance, make 1+1=3. Likewise, God cannot make a being greater than himself because he is, by definition, the greatest possible being. God is limited in his actions to his nature. The Bible supports this, they assert, in passages such as Hebrews 6:18 which says it is "impossible for God to lie."
It is impossible for God to lie because anything he says automatically becomes the truth. Therefore, omnipotence is necessarily limited to what is logically possible within the parameters of the system being observed.
Anyways, this means that two beings can be omnipotent within their universe but not within another, such as the Infinity Gauntlet. Limited (localized) omnipotence is absolutely a thing, as is limited omniscience. For instance, the writer of TOAA is omnipotent within the Marvel universe, but is not omnipotent within our real 3-D universe.
Even then, the writer is only "omnipotent" in the sense that he can do anything that it is possible to do with a pen and paper. He can't make the characters come out of the paper and accomplish tasks in reality or draw them in 4 dimensions or make them move like the pictures in Harry Potter, because those things are not logically possible, so even if he is "omnipotent" it is limited to accomplishing things that are logically possible within the parameters of our reality.
My point is that TOAA could potentially be omnipotent but have less power than another actor, so just because TOAA and the Presence are both omnipotent doesn't make them equals.
Also, on a completely separate tangent, there are absolutely degrees of infinity as well.
There are unlimited integers (whole numbers), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... etc., all the way to infinity. There are also unlimited rational (fractional) numbers to infinity, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4... etc., But there are obviously more rational numbers than there are integers, even though they are both infinity. The second set is a larger infinity than the first set.
Log in to comment