Which one is the better hulk portryal : MCU or 2003 ?

MCU in a landslide.

2003 was a more unstoppable force but MCU had Thor vs Hulk so that solos

None.

MCU.

MCU by far. Ruffalo's Hulk in Avengers 1 would solo this honestly

MUC hulk barely resembled the character we know. He was dragged through the dirt and used as a spring board to launch Thanos onto the screen in IW. They got the character totally wrong, and things would never have gone down the way they did at the begining of that film. From there, it got worse and worse. On the flip side i thought Banner was great, Ruffalo did a fantasic job and it's not his fault that the Russos poor decisions.

Ang lee got a lot right with the Hulk, he wasn't perfect but stomps the current version 10 times over.

And Lee for me.

Always has been, always will be.

@cocacolaman:

Did u understand the question at all? Even by your response it seems you're not.

Anyway yeah hulk 03 was a terrible movie but they got Hulk right

MCU. Mainly because Ruffalo's Hulk was great in the 1st Avengers film

Well, 2003 actually delves into what makes Hulk the Hulk, so by definition...

The MCU version. Ruffalo or Norton.

2003 may not be a good movie, but it actually got the duality of Bruce Banner and Hulk better.

The only time we get something close to this is Avengers 1 and The Incredible Hulk film with Norton (Who I think is the best Banner/Hulk)

Norton's

Norton Hulk was good, but taking the entire MCU into consideration, 2003 Hulk.

2003 needed to look and be more ferocious.I imagine Hulk being a beast, not just powerful.

MCU didn't do so well in that aspect neither, but they did better, at least in the first 3 movies Hulk was in.

I loved it when Hulk started talking in Thor Ragnarok. He sounded just like a child, but in a good and funny way.