Which of the following 3 typical statements is most cringeworthy?

TTGL has no limits

hulk one

First and third.

They all are.

First and third since they both are false.

Batman can beat powerful opponents with preparation. Flash absolutely can win by blitzing.

Hulk being limitless is a blatant NLF.

@thekinfing: Prove the hulk has a limit

This. Battle Forums barely even use comic characters anymore

I can't decide between Batman with Prep or Flash with Speed Force

^^^

Prove he had no limit?

The Hulk is straight up stupid as shit

@majorsour: All those statements about him having limitless strength means nothing? There's literally no evidence to say he has a limit

Statements in the story are usually the same as statements the real-life people make about fictional characters. Some of the statements could be hyperbole, so what about the character's actual demonstrated feats? Has he demonstrated a limitless strength feat?

@majorsour: How is it the same when the narration for his character has been consistent for decades no matter who's writing him especially when even in the story it's been calculated as limitless ?

Well statements can be consistently hyperbole. Like for example every writer says that Superman is a physical god. We know that its clearly hyperbole because Superman doesn't view himself as a god nor is he actually one - assuming the traditional definition. I think that's why in the battles forum people were emphasizing on feats rather than what the characters can do, despite my distaste for such rules.

@majorsour: Nobody says Superman is a God and means it. When Batman says it he usually says something like He came to Earth and could've called himself a God or something similar to that. I don't think it's the same situation