Which feat is more overrated?
Superman surviving the nuke is a great feat trumps most MCU characters
Hulk one shotting the Levianthan is a good striking feat however is ridiculous to think the whale weighs 300,000,000 tons like some MCU fanboys believe
Hancock going to the moon wasn't even showed on camera and something Superman could easily do
It can't be Hancock here, because even you just lowballed it by implying it was just the moon and back. I just posted a math quiz for you last night with the numbers there. A huge part of the journey, in fact the vast majority isn't travel to and from the moon. It is actually painting the 5000000+ square kilometers, and the distance to travel to paint that far exceeds the moon and back, even twice. And depending on how big you think he had of a brush and how perfect you think he got it the first time, he was even beating the required speed margin of Supes India to Delaware in a few seconds by a good margin.
Hulk's feat has been the most overrated, by far.
I think it's so because people don't take into account that the punch was actually meant to kill/KO the creature and to stop it from driving forward and misinterpret it as the punch itself being what stopped it.... In reality, Hulk had to continuously push after to bring it's residual momentum to a halt.
Superman surviving the nuke
It is not like he tanked it or something which people like to claim. He was on the brink of death, and might have died in similar circumstances on a bad day
Hulk's leviathan feat is terribly overrated. I've seen people claim that the leviathan was skyscraper sized but when they were side by side with skyscrapers, the skyscrapers completely dwarfed them. The nuke and moon feat are legitimate powerful feats.
- Hulk's leviathan feat
I've seen people claim Hulk consistently hits with this much force with every punch on so many threads its annoying lol. Its a pretty clear cut Outlier for Hulk
- Superman surviving a nuke
People claim that because Superman tankedor survived the Nuke he can now tank anything lol
- Hancock drawing a heart on the moon
Great feat, underrated actually
- Hulk's leviathan feat
I've seen people claim Hulk consistently hits with this much force with every punch on so many threads its annoying lol. Its a pretty clear cut Outlier for Hulk
- Superman surviving a nuke
People claim that because Superman tankedor survived the Nuke he can now tank anything lol
- Hancock drawing a heart on the moon
Great feat, underrated actually
Namek throwing the train is the most overrated feat in the history of my time on Comic Vine
@saberscar223: throwing a 165 ton train across a town is overrated now? How?
@DammeFavour: yeah and it destroyed the planet too
ps he threw it over a few houses
@saberscar223: yea....I'm still not sure why you label it overrated. It's still one of the biggest strength feat in live action. Certainly better than throwing a tank and forklift over a few metres
No one ever mentions Hancock travelling to the moon and back.
@DammeFavour: Not sure where you got forklifts and tanks from but I’m going to have to agree with you no character in live action could throw a train with one hand effortlessly or they would’ve done it before.
@saberscar223: um.....what are you on about? You're supposed to explain why you think it's overrated because it's a very valid and impressive feat.
And do you lack reading comprehension? I said it's 'one of' the biggest feats in live action, is it not?
Hulk's feat has been the most overrated, by far.
I think it's so because people don't take into account that the punch was actually meant to kill/KO the creature and to stop it from driving forward and misinterpret it as the punch itself being what stopped it.... In reality, Hulk had to continuously push after to bring it's residual momentum to a halt.
It's still impressive though.
Most overrated feat in the history of CV. Apparently these things weighed several thousand tonnes.
IKR, people act like the Leviathan weighed more than like 5 pounds, which is the only way it wouldn't have popped the car tire.
@ithemanwithoutfeari: Yet people think the leviathan weighed 3,000,000 tons Lol.
Supermans nuke feat is beyond overrated. Hulk leviathan feat is more underrated than overrated.
This. While the weight of the Leviathan is highly controversial, the way they showed the damage in Avengers makes Hulk's punch difficult to assess. The Leviathans are able to slowly glide through a building with ease and Jarvis specifically states that the Arc Reactor would run out of energy before being able to penetrate through its hull yet you have a dead one landing on top of a building or car and almost no extensive damage is made.
Quick Tangent - The only way I've managed to headcanon this is that the Chitari use a Mass Effect type mass/gravity machine but that's neither here nor there.
Supermans nuke feat is beyond overrated. Hulk leviathan feat is more underrated than overrated.
This. While the weight of the Leviathan is highly controversial, the way they showed the damage in Avengers makes Hulk's punch difficult to assess. The Leviathans are able to slowly glide through a building with ease and Jarvis specifically states that the Arc Reactor would run out of energy before being able to penetrate through its hull yet you have a dead one landing on top of a building or car and almost no extensive damage is made.
Quick Tangent - The only way I've managed to headcanon this is that the Chitari use a Mass Effect type mass/gravity machine but that's neither here nor there.
I never thought the arc reactor was what powered the suit, it's more of a weapon and propellant due to its repulsion.
Supermans nuke feat is beyond overrated. Hulk leviathan feat is more underrated than overrated.
This. While the weight of the Leviathan is highly controversial, the way they showed the damage in Avengers makes Hulk's punch difficult to assess. The Leviathans are able to slowly glide through a building with ease and Jarvis specifically states that the Arc Reactor would run out of energy before being able to penetrate through its hull yet you have a dead one landing on top of a building or car and almost no extensive damage is made.
Quick Tangent - The only way I've managed to headcanon this is that the Chitari use a Mass Effect type mass/gravity machine but that's neither here nor there.
I never thought the arc reactor was what powered the suit, it's more of a weapon and propellant due to its repulsion.
I'm not sure about the comic suits nowadays but the MCU ones are Arc powered. You see this in end fight of Iron Man 1 with the old arc's power being why the Mark III struggles against the Iron Monger armour. It's also why the later suits have their own arcs (seen in Iron Man 3) so not to drain Tony's during battle.
Hulk's leviathan feat is terribly overrated. I've seen people claim that the leviathan was skyscraper sized but when they were side by side with skyscrapers, the skyscrapers completely dwarfed them. The nuke and moon feat are legitimate powerful feats.
Supermans nuke feat is beyond overrated. Hulk leviathan feat is more underrated than overrated.
This. While the weight of the Leviathan is highly controversial, the way they showed the damage in Avengers makes Hulk's punch difficult to assess. The Leviathans are able to slowly glide through a building with ease and Jarvis specifically states that the Arc Reactor would run out of energy before being able to penetrate through its hull yet you have a dead one landing on top of a building or car and almost no extensive damage is made.
Quick Tangent - The only way I've managed to headcanon this is that the Chitari use a Mass Effect type mass/gravity machine but that's neither here nor there.
I never thought the arc reactor was what powered the suit, it's more of a weapon and propellant due to its repulsion.
I'm not sure about the comic suits nowadays but the MCU ones are Arc powered. You see this in end fight of Iron Man 1 with the old arc's power being why the Mark III struggles against the Iron Monger armour. It's also why the later suits have their own arcs (seen in Iron Man 3) so not to drain Tony's during battle.
Yeah I notice that, but then in Ironman 3 we are led to believe the suits need charging before they can be used which has nothing to do with his repulsors. Which makes sense as we see in avengers he using nuclear energy to power up his building instead of repulsor tech. From what I understand his arc reactor helps in his suit's functionality like movement, flying and weaponry and if his suit uses repulsor for power then everytime the suits powerlevels drop to 0 he would also die since he uses the same arc reactor.
Supermans nuke feat is beyond overrated. Hulk leviathan feat is more underrated than overrated.
This. While the weight of the Leviathan is highly controversial, the way they showed the damage in Avengers makes Hulk's punch difficult to assess. The Leviathans are able to slowly glide through a building with ease and Jarvis specifically states that the Arc Reactor would run out of energy before being able to penetrate through its hull yet you have a dead one landing on top of a building or car and almost no extensive damage is made.
Quick Tangent - The only way I've managed to headcanon this is that the Chitari use a Mass Effect type mass/gravity machine but that's neither here nor there.
I never thought the arc reactor was what powered the suit, it's more of a weapon and propellant due to its repulsion.
I'm not sure about the comic suits nowadays but the MCU ones are Arc powered. You see this in end fight of Iron Man 1 with the old arc's power being why the Mark III struggles against the Iron Monger armour. It's also why the later suits have their own arcs (seen in Iron Man 3) so not to drain Tony's during battle.
Yeah I notice that, but then in Ironman 3 we are led to believe the suits need charging before they can be used which has nothing to do with his repulsors. Which makes sense as we see in avengers he using nuclear energy to power up his building instead of repulsor tech. From what I understand his arc reactor helps in his suit's functionality like movement, flying and weaponry and if his suit uses repulsor for power then everytime the suits powerlevels drop to 0 he would also die since he uses the same arc reactor.
As far as I remember, it was only the 42 that was actually charged up. This makes sense for two reasons; it's a prototype and so hasn't been given its own arc until the bugs are worked out, and two; its a modular armour so could be said to be better without its own arc.
Now I'm not saying either of those reasons are canon but they are possibilities. Especially since it's not mentioned/indicated that any of his other armours need charging.
As far as the Avengers film. I'm pretty sure the Stark Tower is actually run by a giant arc reactor and not nuclear power. The entire point was ST to be on a better and cheaper source of energy.
Supermans nuke feat is beyond overrated. Hulk leviathan feat is more underrated than overrated.
This. While the weight of the Leviathan is highly controversial, the way they showed the damage in Avengers makes Hulk's punch difficult to assess. The Leviathans are able to slowly glide through a building with ease and Jarvis specifically states that the Arc Reactor would run out of energy before being able to penetrate through its hull yet you have a dead one landing on top of a building or car and almost no extensive damage is made.
Quick Tangent - The only way I've managed to headcanon this is that the Chitari use a Mass Effect type mass/gravity machine but that's neither here nor there.
I never thought the arc reactor was what powered the suit, it's more of a weapon and propellant due to its repulsion.
I'm not sure about the comic suits nowadays but the MCU ones are Arc powered. You see this in end fight of Iron Man 1 with the old arc's power being why the Mark III struggles against the Iron Monger armour. It's also why the later suits have their own arcs (seen in Iron Man 3) so not to drain Tony's during battle.
Yeah I notice that, but then in Ironman 3 we are led to believe the suits need charging before they can be used which has nothing to do with his repulsors. Which makes sense as we see in avengers he using nuclear energy to power up his building instead of repulsor tech. From what I understand his arc reactor helps in his suit's functionality like movement, flying and weaponry and if his suit uses repulsor for power then everytime the suits powerlevels drop to 0 he would also die since he uses the same arc reactor.
As far as I remember, it was only the 42 that was actually charged up. This makes sense for two reasons; it's a prototype and so hasn't been given its own arc until the bugs are worked out, and two; its a modular armour so could be said to be better without its own arc.
Now I'm not saying either of those reasons are canon but they are possibilities. Especially since it's not mentioned/indicated that any of his other armours need charging.
As far as the Avengers film. I'm pretty sure the Stark Tower is actually run by a giant arc reactor and not nuclear power. The entire point was ST to be on a better and cheaper source of energy.
Yeah just saw the scene. But it doesn't make sense why he would use electricity as a powersource for what would be an advanced suit even if it's a prototype. And if it hadn't been given it's own arc reactor, then the other suits also didn't have their own arc reactor as they were sharing the one on his chest.
Supermans nuke feat is beyond overrated. Hulk leviathan feat is more underrated than overrated.
This. While the weight of the Leviathan is highly controversial, the way they showed the damage in Avengers makes Hulk's punch difficult to assess. The Leviathans are able to slowly glide through a building with ease and Jarvis specifically states that the Arc Reactor would run out of energy before being able to penetrate through its hull yet you have a dead one landing on top of a building or car and almost no extensive damage is made.
Quick Tangent - The only way I've managed to headcanon this is that the Chitari use a Mass Effect type mass/gravity machine but that's neither here nor there.
I never thought the arc reactor was what powered the suit, it's more of a weapon and propellant due to its repulsion.
I'm not sure about the comic suits nowadays but the MCU ones are Arc powered. You see this in end fight of Iron Man 1 with the old arc's power being why the Mark III struggles against the Iron Monger armour. It's also why the later suits have their own arcs (seen in Iron Man 3) so not to drain Tony's during battle.
Yeah I notice that, but then in Ironman 3 we are led to believe the suits need charging before they can be used which has nothing to do with his repulsors. Which makes sense as we see in avengers he using nuclear energy to power up his building instead of repulsor tech. From what I understand his arc reactor helps in his suit's functionality like movement, flying and weaponry and if his suit uses repulsor for power then everytime the suits powerlevels drop to 0 he would also die since he uses the same arc reactor.
As far as I remember, it was only the 42 that was actually charged up. This makes sense for two reasons; it's a prototype and so hasn't been given its own arc until the bugs are worked out, and two; its a modular armour so could be said to be better without its own arc.
Now I'm not saying either of those reasons are canon but they are possibilities. Especially since it's not mentioned/indicated that any of his other armours need charging.
As far as the Avengers film. I'm pretty sure the Stark Tower is actually run by a giant arc reactor and not nuclear power. The entire point was ST to be on a better and cheaper source of energy.
Yeah just saw the scene. But it doesn't make sense why he would use electricity as a powersource for what would be an advanced suit even if it's a prototype. And if it hadn't been given it's own arc reactor, then the other suits also didn't have their own arc reactor as they were sharing the one on his chest.
I saw the electricity charging as simply a way of getting the Mark 42 to Tony where it could then take its power from his arc. And the Iron Legion had their own arcs as their lights are easily seen.
People overrate Superman's feat by saying he tanked the nuke, when he was left almost like a skeleton, that is not tanking a nuke, (that automatically makes him multicontinental or planet level lol).
Hulk's feat is overrated when people say the Leviathans weighted 300000000 tons, but that's it, Hulk actually oneshoted a thing that was easily going through buildings and could tank Iron Man' s lasers.
Then the Hancock feat IMO is the more overrated, when it's only a travel speed feat, wich cannot be used in debates as a combat speed or reaction speed feat, yet people use it for saying Hancock blitzes, when he has never used such speed on Earth and his best reaction feat is swatting away a grenade.
Then the Hancock feat IMO is the more overrated, when it's only a travel speed feat, wich cannot be used in debates as a combat speed or reaction speed feat, yet people use it for saying Hancock blitzes, when he has never used such speed on Earth and his best reaction feat is swatting away a grenade.
Travel speed, yet it had to be precise enough for all of those turns... And if you say he didn't have to be as precise and could haphazardly go about it, then you have to make him go even waay faster - after which if his normal speed can hit a fraction of that, it doesn't even matter for the context in most of the battles it was used on.
And using it to blitz bank robbers IS the definition of using speed in combat. Was he using this kind of speed in combat perhaps? Doubtful, because even if he could, it would be a wasted effort most of the time - and compared to most of the threads this has been debated on, the opposition often had their best speed feats put into things like 'but went from X to X', with combat speed implications that don't really tell me they are in any way slower than Hancock.
@theonewhopullsthestrings: are you implying he blitzed the robbers at the same speed he flew to the moon?
Hulk's Leviathan punch by far. It's impressive nonetheless but not as impressive as most of people thinks.
Most overrated feat in the history of CV. Apparently these things weighed several thousand tonnes.
Some individuals thinks those flying whales weighted over 10,000+ to approximately 20,000 tonnes.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment