@karkus: not really you can accurately prove why a certain character can beat this character but with Thor vs hulk threads they are so inconsistent with each I don’t think it even matters at this point.
Doesn't need to have a point in order to exist for the sake of discussion. I mean, I even generally agree with that sort of sentiment. Fictional characters exist and spring forth from a writers imagination. They take on sort types of objective form... the same way random doodles do... they are given a bit more weight, as part of a business/franchised medium that has a partial goal of delivering 'consistency' and 'canon' but even then its all fake and not bound to reality. Imagine random online people arguing about random things your imagination cooks up and trying to make objective claims about them, when you can change your stance on a whim.
That being said, people discuss and enjoy talking about all manner of ideas that aren't bound or consistent with reality. Planet sized cyborg lion vs 100 Moon sized Polar Bears with laser eyes, for example.
I don’t think people are actually understanding what I’m trying to say. I’m asking what is the point of hulk vs Thor threads Blayne they are not even consistent with each other
Warning, a CV user is reaching self-awareness. Avoid contact with this anomalous user at any cost. Seriously though, the point is the same as any other fictional character vs fictional character debate that goes on here.
Same can be said for any thread or battle on the internet. Debating is a hobby for fun and fans are passionate about there characters. Its all for fun and because people like discussing comics.
Log in to comment