@darthadi:
1. If you want me to provide explicit evidence that he wasn't racist I don't have that.
My point is that him being racist was never hinted in his myriad of previous appearances
Which is largely the case because Dooku is written from other character's POVs where he tries to sell himself as a politically justified revolutionary - someone fighting against the corruption of the Republic. Due to the fact that this is a mask, his core motivations are actually very flexible/underdeveloped, meaning Stover can colour them in to a greater extent without really stepping on any previous writer's work.
despite being a PoV character in Y:DR
But Yoda: Dark Rendevous doesn't explore Dooku's end goals and plans, so this isn't a problem? We know he wants power, but what form this specifically would take is unknown.
In fact, this is basically my issue with your entire argument, you're critiquing Stover for adding details to his character and calling it "butchery" when Dooku didn't really have much established at his core to begin with.
(hard to belive in general that this Dooku is the same person as the sociopath from the ROTS novel)
The reason the two versions of Dooku seem different is purely because YDR Dooku is leaning towards the light from the very start of the novel. He's in a unique moment of vulnerability where he displays regret for his actions, so that makes him sympathetic, but if you look at it his character traits they're fundamentally the same as they are in ROTS. He has the same arrogance and view of his own superiority, the same desire for power, the same jealousy of Anakin, etc. In fact, he rejects any possibility for redemption for himself, and continues his war which causes mass death purely for his own personal gain, precisely because of the latter reason - showing just how sociopathic and spiteful he really is.
Introducing such a drastic characteristic to a character at the eleventh hour is still character butchery in my eyes.
It isn't drastic. Given how the Dark Side is basically totally focused on the acquisition of power it isn't a big shift to go from "someone who wants to rule" to "someone who wants humans (himself) to rule over aliens" especially if they have the background of being an aristocrat where discrimination towards "lower class citizens" is common.
--- --- ---
2. Kenobi being called a better man/jedi because he's Anakin's master is not equivalent to this "For Padme Amidala, saying I'm Anakin Skywalker's wife is saying neither more or less than I am alive"
In quoting this you seem to have missed the reason why. The subsequent sentence establishes that this is the case because her life before Anakin was so inferior to how it is now: "Her life before Anakin belonged to someone else, some lesser being to be pitied, some poor impoverished spirit who could never suspect how profoundly life should be lived."
Or, in other words, very similar to a certain statement from the passage I posted regarding Kenobi: "And Obi-Wan Kenobi knows, too, that to have lived his life without being Master to Anakin Skywalker would have left him a different man. A lesser man."
or this "her innermost reality, the most fundamental, unbreakable core of her being"
In Kenobi's case this is basically said without the words being explicitly written. It's described that everything he is, including the ultimate Jedi, is because he's Anakin's best friend - meaning it could probably be stated that being such is the "core" of his being, too.
Overall, I think that both passages are clearly written with the same gist/run along the same lines. We can quibble over semantics more, but, frankly, I think it's just missing the fact that Stover wrote Anakin as the protagonist of the novel and thus hyperbolically described many character's in such a way that emphasised Anakin's importance to their lives.
Log in to comment