The assumptions that paper don't fit what we see at all
Even if we called that a solar flare accepting it had a gravity of a bit over 380 billion Gs or that it was 2 billion Kelvin and that it fit the other assumptions doesn't make sense
The assumptions that paper don't fit what we see at all
Even if we called that a solar flare accepting it had a gravity of a bit over 380 billion Gs or that it was 2 billion Kelvin and that it fit the other assumptions doesn't make sense
I think there's some suspension of disbelief/artificial gravity with dyson spheres since humans work on them and stuff. Maybe the device around the star negates its gravity?
I still don't know what's up with rings, if that is star gravity or more gravity magic. This must be the case with Nidavellir since the orbiting rings have zero G environments
The assumptions that paper don't fit what we see at all
Even if we called that a solar flare accepting it had a gravity of a bit over 380 billion Gs or that it was 2 billion Kelvin and that it fit the other assumptions doesn't make sense
I think there's some suspension of disbelief/artificial gravity with dyson spheres since humans work on them and stuff. Maybe the device around the star negates its gravity?
I still don't know what's up with rings, if that is star gravity or more gravity magic. This must be the case with Nidavellir since the orbiting rings have zero G environments
If it negates the gravity this still becomes irrelevant for Nidavellir.
The assumptions that paper don't fit what we see at all
Even if we called that a solar flare accepting it had a gravity of a bit over 380 billion Gs or that it was 2 billion Kelvin and that it fit the other assumptions doesn't make sense
I think there's some suspension of disbelief/artificial gravity with dyson spheres since humans work on them and stuff. Maybe the device around the star negates its gravity?
I still don't know what's up with rings, if that is star gravity or more gravity magic. This must be the case with Nidavellir since the orbiting rings have zero G environments
If it negates the gravity this still becomes irrelevant for Nidavellir.
but that's surface gravity tho. Negating gravity on a surface far away from the stars own surface would be irrelevant as well
but that's surface gravity tho. Negating gravity on a surface far away from the stars own surface would be irrelevant as well
Exposed surface didnt pull in anything either and gravity (tech)magically vanishing from surface onwards would also break this. Wdym by the second part?
but that's surface gravity tho. Negating gravity on a surface far away from the stars own surface would be irrelevant as well
Exposed surface didnt pull in anything either and gravity (tech)magically vanishing from surface onwards would also break this. Wdym by the second part?
Fair point the surface exposed didn't pull anything, but outside of Thor, what exactly would it have pulled? The structure designed to contain it?
if they're durable as Groot or Eitri they could at least tank it
All it means is that it was less concentrated on Groot/Rocket Racoon then it was on Thor Odinson.
Also you know I like you but let's not stoop to that level.
You don't see me dismissing 3.5 Million K Heat Vision even though it did not destroy anything in the vicinity etc and some other anti feats I am sure you are aware of.
if they're durable as Groot or Eitri they could at least tank it
All it means is that it was less concentrated on Groot/Rocket Racoon then it was on Thor Odinson.
They are at the rings including Thor and nothing happened to them.
Also you know I like you but let's not stoop to that level.
This is casual argument, don't make it personal.
You don't see me dismissing 3.5 Million K Heat Vision even though it did not destroy anything in the vicinity etc and some other anti feats I am sure you are aware of.
There are heat based beams that's more potent than 3.5 million kelvin in many fiction and they disregarded that logic, science doesn't always occur in fiction and you know that. There's no anti-feats, kryptonians can control the intensity of their heat vision and it was proven in the comics.
if they're durable as Groot or Eitri they could at least tank it
All it means is that it was less concentrated on Groot/Rocket Racoon then it was on Thor Odinson.
They're are at the rings including Thor.
Also you know I like you but let's not stoop to that level.
This is casual argument, don't make it personal.
You don't see me dismissing 3.5 Million K Heat Vision even though it did not destroy anything in the vicinity etc and some other anti feats I am sure you are aware of.
There are heat based beams that's more potent that 3.5 million kelvin in fiction and they disregard that logic. There's no anti-feats, kryptonians can control the intensity of their heat vision and it was proven in the comics.
1. Yeah but they obviously weren't hit with the Full Brunt of the attack.
Thor was considering he was the one opening the rings.
2. Okay sorry if I offended you.
3. Good point.
But my point above still stands.
Also just watched the scene.
They weren't where Thor was.
He was at the place where the Full Rays/Solar Flare of the Neutron star are at their highest.
Also the Spheres seem to have some weird properties which allocates the Ray's into a singular point.
Which is why Eitri said he will be taking the full force of the star.
And also why he probably never got incinerated when Forging Materials like Uru.
So yeah.
I will agree.
If the Dceu Heavy Hitters.
Are in the sidelines where Groot/Rocket Racoon are.
They will survive I guess lol.
But if they are at the place where the Dystopian rings are and are subjected to the full force of the star like Thor was.
@legend531: Thor is alongside with Racoon when they pulled the rings, they are at a ring. Eitri is also at a ring and is exposed to the 'flare' as you can see here.
@legend531: Thor is alongside with Racoon when they pulled the rings, they're at a ring. Eitri is also at a ring and is exposed to the flare as you can see here.
if they're durable as Groot or Eitri they could at least tank it
All it means is that it was less concentrated on Groot/Rocket Racoon then it was on Thor Odinson.
They're are at the rings including Thor.
Also you know I like you but let's not stoop to that level.
This is casual argument, don't make it personal.
You don't see me dismissing 3.5 Million K Heat Vision even though it did not destroy anything in the vicinity etc and some other anti feats I am sure you are aware of.
There are heat based beams that's more potent that 3.5 million kelvin in fiction and they disregard that logic. There's no anti-feats, kryptonians can control the intensity of their heat vision and it was proven in the comics.
1. Yeah but they obviously weren't hit with the Full Brunt of the attack.
Thor was considering he was the one opening the rings.
2. Okay sorry if I offended you.
3. Good point.
But my point above still stands.
Also just watched the scene.
They weren't where Thor was.
He was at the place where the Full Rays/Solar Flare of the Neutron star are at their highest.
Also the Spheres seem to have some weird properties which allocates the Ray's into a singular point.
Which is why Eitri said he will be taking the full force of the star.
And also why he probably never got incinerated when Forging Materials like Uru.
So yeah.
I will agree.
If the Dceu Heavy Hitters.
Are in the sidelines where Groot/Rocket Racoon are.
They will survive I guess lol.
But if they are at the place where the Dystopian rings are and are subjected to the full force of the star like Thor was.
None of them are surviving.
Period.
Except Kryptonians are a thing. Sure everyone else dies but supes and most likely other Kryptonians survive mostly because they draw their power from sunlight and as far as I can tell, the forge either uses a white dwarf or a neutron star - not the dying red giant that Krypton is associated with.
Did that legend531 guy seriously say that if the DCEU high tiers are where Rocket and Groot were "I guess they would survive"
So now even Groot/RR are being compared to DCEU high tiers
No, not only are they being compared, it's to the point where something that does'nt bother Groot/RR is questionable rather DCEU high tiers can survive it, lmfao
First it was Spidey being compared to DIiana and Arthur now it's Rocket and Groot compared to SM/Zod/Doomsday
Did that legend531 guy seriously say that if the DCEU high tiers are where Rocket and Groot were "I guess they would survive"
So now even Groot/RR are being compared to DCEU high tiers
No, not only are they being compared, it's to the point where something that does'nt bother Groot/RR is questionable rather DCEU high tiers can survive it, lmfao
First it was Spidey being compared to DIiana and Arthur now it's Rocket and Groot compared to SM/Zod/Doomsday
Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru
Smh why the strawman?
Where in my comment did I insinuate Groot and Rocket Racoon are comparable to Dceu Heavy Hitters?
Log in to comment