• 101 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for modernww2fare
Posted by modernww2fare (7121 posts) 2 years, 9 months ago

Poll: Is Rotten Tomatoes biased against DC? (161 votes)

Yes 34%
No 66%
No Caption Provided

Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
#1 Posted by Jonny_Anonymous (45774 posts) - - Show Bio

Not sure how that can be possible, WB own Rotten Tomatoes.

Avatar image for slayz
#2 Posted by Slayz (2236 posts) - - Show Bio

Rotten Tomatoes combines reviews from multiple sources, it can't be biased lol.

Now, of course, there are some reviewers I imagine are legitimately biased against DC properties. It's probably like a meme to them at this point just to harp on the DCEU.

Avatar image for stormshadow_x
#3 Edited by StormShadow_X (16766 posts) - - Show Bio

Eh. I don't know why they would, I also doubt Disney is dirty enough to pay them off as some people say(Seriously They wouldn't care). There are quite a few biased to DC in general though.

Avatar image for heatblaze
#4 Posted by Heatblaze (10399 posts) - - Show Bio

.........Maybe a little?

*shrugs*

Avatar image for batman3000
#5 Posted by Batman3000 (5652 posts) - - Show Bio

I would say no but it would make me feel better to say yes...

TDK Trioligy

Batman Begins 85%

The Dark Knight 94%

The Dark Knight Rises 87%

VS.

DCEU

Batman Vs Superman: Dawn Of Justice 27%

Suicide Squad 36%

If I'm being 100% honest to myself it seems that they just honestly review good and bad movies and you can't really judge them being bias when it's a community of users and critics. By doing so you're judging them as a whole and that's not really fair. That doesn't mean I disagree with them every once in awhile though.

Avatar image for modernww2fare
#6 Edited by modernww2fare (7121 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for petey_is_spidey
#7 Posted by Petey_is_Spidey (11674 posts) - - Show Bio

@slayz said:

Rotten Tomatoes combines reviews from multiple sources, it can't be biased lol.

Now, of course, there are some reviewers I imagine are legitimately biased against DC properties. It's probably like a meme to them at this point just to harp on the DCEU.

Avatar image for batman3000
#8 Posted by Batman3000 (5652 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for jgames
#9 Posted by Jgames (8187 posts) - - Show Bio

BvS TC was a messy movie, that it be difficult for most reviewers to say is a good movie, along with Man of Steel being darker then it needed to be. So I said no, but I will say that they do seem to have a bias on marvel considering Iron Man 2 is fresh somehow, and X-men apocalypse is rotten somehow. It seem like the gold standard is marvel movies for reviewers, even when some of them cough*Iron man 2 the crappy movie and lame villain*cough is sub par.

Avatar image for youknowwhattodo
#10 Edited by youknowwhattodo (2196 posts) - - Show Bio

I'm not sure, but I've been a supporter of the conspiracy theory that many DC fans are biased for DCEU films.

Avatar image for entropy_aegis
#11 Posted by entropy_aegis (20855 posts) - - Show Bio

RT just aggregates the reviews of the websites/magazines etc. It's nothing on its own, I think they are biased but not because of some Marvel agenda. Critics tend to be uppity and have a contrarian approach. This is just my theory but I think they are against new entrants in the super hero blockbuster setting, they want the bubble to burst so that "important movies" can get the spot light.

Avatar image for jumpstart55
#12 Posted by jumpstart55 (11025 posts) - - Show Bio

I think people confuse bias with expectation...Since the MCU has sort of defined what a Superhero movie is supposed to look like over the last 8 years, people have come to expect their cbms to be a certain way, preferably a blend of action and comedy..Not saying i agree with the expectation, quite the opposite i wont as many diverse cbms as possible..And then there's the simple fact that the movies just might be bad..lmao

Avatar image for brucerogers
#13 Posted by BruceRogers (17450 posts) - - Show Bio

RT just aggregates the reviews of the websites/magazines etc. It's nothing on its own, I think they are biased but not because of some Marvel agenda. Critics tend to be uppity and have a contrarian approach. This is just my theory but I think they are against new entrants in the super hero blockbuster setting, they want the bubble to burst so that "important movies" can get the spot light.

Seems that way.

Avatar image for petey_is_spidey
#14 Posted by Petey_is_Spidey (11674 posts) - - Show Bio

Certain critics are, but like Slayz said, RT isn't really a reviewer in itself.

Take this for example

MoS: 56% at 6.2/10

BvS: 27% at 4.9/10

Now, two comparably "bad" Marvel movies (this is not based on my opinion but based on various rating sites such as iMBD, RT, Metacritic, Google Play, Amazon, ComicBook movies, etc) from FANS:

Ironman 3: 79% at 7/10

Thor: TDW: 66% AT 6.2/10 (it got the same score as MoS, but more people liked it, telling me two things; the people who disliked MoS REALLY disliked it, OR the people who liked Thor REALLY liked it. I think the former is more likely)

Now tell me that there isn't something wrong with this picture? There's obviously a huge discrepancy between fan and critical opinion.

Avatar image for black_arrow
#15 Posted by Black_Arrow (10279 posts) - - Show Bio

RT just aggregates the reviews of the websites/magazines etc. It's nothing on its own, I think they are biased but not because of some Marvel agenda. Critics tend to be uppity and have a contrarian approach. This is just my theory but I think they are against new entrants in the super hero blockbuster setting, they want the bubble to burst so that "important movies" can get the spot light.

I agree.

Avatar image for infantfinite128
#16 Posted by infantfinite128 (5855 posts) - - Show Bio

Nope. I guarantee the Lego Batman movie will get great reviews.

Avatar image for incursion2
#17 Posted by incursion2 (2072 posts) - - Show Bio

RT just aggregates the reviews of the websites/magazines etc. It's nothing on its own, I think they are biased but not because of some Marvel agenda. Critics tend to be uppity and have a contrarian approach. This is just my theory but I think they are against new entrants in the super hero blockbuster setting, they want the bubble to burst so that "important movies" can get the spot light.

Avatar image for lvenger
#18 Posted by Lvenger (36338 posts) - - Show Bio

It can't be that DC films or the DCEU approach to films is bad, it has to be a critics' agenda or an anti DC/pro Marvel agenda.

Avatar image for manwhohaseverything
#19 Posted by Manwhohaseverything (3818 posts) - - Show Bio

If there's bias, it's being pro-Disney. (And I disagree..Disney is dirty enough to do anything, but I digress) How else can one explain Thor, TDW, IM2, IM3 and AoU being "fresh". I also notice they seem to get a lot of passes. Little was said about Spidey being forced into CW. I can't imagine if WB had pulled something like that off that it wouldn't have been a bigger deal. Heck, TWS is my 2nd fav MCU and it had 3 cringe-worthy moments. (Cap and Black Widow kissing an holding hands to escape Hydra, Cap being 5 feet from the surface after being blown up in a underground computer room that took an elevator a long time to get down to it, and the professional assassins with high powered guns missing Nick Fury from point blank range..and maybe even Gary Shandling being cast as a villain.) The good parts overcame that, but I just don't think WB could've gotten away with something like that, or any other non-Disney studio.

Avatar image for sleeping_and_eating
#20 Posted by sleeping_and_eating (341 posts) - - Show Bio

This is mind boggling....Snyder had nothing to do with the film this time.

Avatar image for buttersdaman000
#21 Posted by buttersdaman000 (22858 posts) - - Show Bio

RT just aggregates the reviews of the websites/magazines etc. It's nothing on its own, I think they are biased but not because of some Marvel agenda. Critics tend to be uppity and have a contrarian approach. This is just my theory but I think they are against new entrants in the super hero blockbuster setting, they want the bubble to burst so that "important movies" can get the spot light.

Avatar image for kcomicfan
#22 Edited by kcomicfan (4690 posts) - - Show Bio

No.

Avatar image for havenless
#23 Posted by Havenless (3106 posts) - - Show Bio

I think they're heavily biased against bad movies.

Avatar image for DammeFavour
#24 Edited by DammeFavour (8466 posts) - - Show Bio

@batman3000: except that the dark knight trilogy came before the mcu was really established as u can see with how people bashed TDKR that came out the same year as the avengers

Avatar image for heatforce
#25 Posted by Heatforce (6268 posts) - - Show Bio

RT the site is not biased. In fact, iirc WB owns RT in some way. Plus the DC TV shows are rated very good too. That stated, I do think there is a bias among some or more of the critics. But they won't ever admit to it.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a04a566e9ae3
#26 Posted by deactivated-5a04a566e9ae3 (12864 posts) - - Show Bio

nope

Avatar image for thesilentripper
#27 Posted by TheSilentRipper (2530 posts) - - Show Bio

Nope, the movies are just bad

Avatar image for heatforce
#28 Posted by Heatforce (6268 posts) - - Show Bio

@thesilentripper: Well, it's not like RT hasn't given good ratings to bad movies (ghostbusters 2016, ironman 2, Lucy, etc.) so I understand why people think the reverse.

Avatar image for tdk_1997
#29 Edited by TDK_1997 (18740 posts) - - Show Bio

It seems that they aren't exactly against DC or Warner Bros. but more of against the different approach WB has towards it's movies. They want to see that Marvel tone in every comic book related movie and when they don't get it they immediately think it is something bad that would not last the test of time.

That's why I don't like Rotten Tomatoes. Most of the movies of my taste aren't of the website's taste.

Avatar image for buttersdaman000
#30 Posted by buttersdaman000 (22858 posts) - - Show Bio

@tdk_1997 said:

It seems that they aren't exactly against DC or Warner Bros. but more of against the different approach WB has towards it's movies. They want to see that Marvel tone in every comic book related movie and when they don't get it they immediately think it is something bad that would not last the test of time.

Bingo. And when they realize the movie doesn't follow the MCU approach, they dig into it and tear it apart.

Avatar image for redatom1234
#31 Posted by Redatom1234 (2813 posts) - - Show Bio

No. There's a bias among fans and the general audience. A moviegoer like me would class the ultimate cut of BVS as the best movie I've seen in a long time. However the average movie goer would rather a fun marvel movie and complain about superman being too dark and basically exaggerate problems which in turn place marvel on a pedestal

Long story short. The GA is too used to marvel films.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c901e667a76c
#32 Posted by deactivated-5c901e667a76c (36557 posts) - - Show Bio

No, but I'm certain Comic Vine is biased toward DC.

Moderator
Avatar image for deactivated-5c9535a734784
#33 Posted by deactivated-5c9535a734784 (2578 posts) - - Show Bio

No. Deadpool has 83% and X men: Days of Future past has 91%. The reason DCEU films have bad reviews is probably because they're not favorable. Even though comic book fans loathe Marvel's worst films, they're at least competently made and enjoyable. The only one I legitimately can't stand is Thor: The Dark World but near enough every person I know who saw it, loved it. I think one person didn't enjoy it. On the flip side, I literally sold Man of Steel to my friends and they all saw it and most of them said it was boring and one person said it was average. The same group saw BVS and one thought it was worse then the Human centipede, the rest said it was rubbish. So, either DC is doing something very wrong or everyone is out to get them. But then again the highest rated CBM of all time is a DC film.

Avatar image for wastelandman
#34 Posted by WastelandMan (8810 posts) - - Show Bio

.............No.

TDK Trilogy, Burton films, and the original Superman franchise (first two) were all very well received. People just need to accept the idea that most reviewers give negative reviews to the films because they genuinely think it sucks. You can disagree and have your own opinion of course but don't pretend it's because of some overarching bias.

Avatar image for farkam
#35 Posted by Farkam (12036 posts) - - Show Bio

This is so pathetic.

Avatar image for mfundroid
#36 Edited by Mfundroid (2916 posts) - - Show Bio

No. Look at DC's television series, almost all of them are doing either good or great critically. Clearly their television department is doing something right.

Avatar image for mfundroid
#37 Posted by Mfundroid (2916 posts) - - Show Bio

@farkam: I just find your comments incredibly entertaining sometimes, LOL.

Avatar image for deactivated-1351355
#38 Posted by deactivated-1351355 (5579 posts) - - Show Bio
@xwraith said:

No, but I'm certain Comic Vine is biased toward DC.

Avatar image for asgardianbrony
#39 Posted by ASGARDIANBRONY (11629 posts) - - Show Bio

@laylah said:
@xwraith said:

No, but I'm certain Comic Vine is biased toward DC.

Avatar image for thor_parker82
#40 Posted by Thor_Parker82 (16365 posts) - - Show Bio

No. Deadpool has 83% and X men: Days of Future past has 91%. The reason DCEU films have bad reviews is probably because they're not favorable. Even though comic book fans loathe Marvel's worst films, they're at least competently made and enjoyable. The only one I legitimately can't stand is Thor: The Dark World but near enough every person I know who saw it, loved it. I think one person didn't enjoy it. On the flip side, I literally sold Man of Steel to my friends and they all saw it and most of them said it was boring and one person said it was average. The same group saw BVS and one thought it was worse then the Human centipede, the rest said it was rubbish. So, either DC is doing something very wrong or everyone is out to get them. But then again the highest rated CBM of all time is a DC film.

This so much

Avatar image for micah007123
#43 Posted by micah007123 (10836 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for asgaard
#44 Edited by Asgaard (4518 posts) - - Show Bio

Nope! Its just the comic book fans mentality that is used to have huge influence in the bubble that they live in, but the movies medium is way bigger than the comics medium and if some youtubers and comic book sites are depend on the clicks from the fans, the reviewer from the Washington Post could care less about that... That is why i can constantly apply the sturgeon law on movies but not on comics, for the most part comics are always good...

Avatar image for mickey-mouse
#45 Edited by MICKEY-MOUSE (36840 posts) - - Show Bio

Many of the publications owned by Time Warner give DC movies bad reviews; take a nap...

Avatar image for deactivated-5967bf6197d40
#46 Posted by deactivated-5967bf6197d40 (2560 posts) - - Show Bio

@lvenger said:

It can't be that DC films or the DCEU approach to films is bad, it has to be a critics' agenda or an anti DC/pro Marvel agenda.

@farkam said:

This is so pathetic.

Avatar image for batman3000
#47 Posted by Batman3000 (5652 posts) - - Show Bio

@DammeFavour: Getting 87% is not getting bashed. Critics and fans alike deemed a worthy end to the legacy Nolan crafted in fact it's more so the fans that bash TDKR not the critics.

Avatar image for Flickerblink
#48 Posted by Flickerblink (283 posts) - - Show Bio

No, anyone who says yes is delusional. I mean seriously, learn how RT works first. It is a collection of various critic's reviews from hundreds of different media outlets, the percentage is the amount of favorable reviews (6/10 or higher). There are some critics who liked BvS and MoS but didn't like SS. Critics who liked SS but not BvS or MoS, some didn't like all three and then there is everything in between.

Avatar image for conner_wolf
#49 Posted by Conner_Wolf (6380 posts) - - Show Bio

Anyone who voted yes, you're ignorant and don't know how Rotten Tomatoes works.

Avatar image for comicace3
#50 Posted by comicace3 (12434 posts) - - Show Bio

Not really.