Is DCEU Wonder Woman bulletproof?

By feats, yes.

Statements no

Most likely not

No. She has to shield from bullets and has been caused to bleed by one before.

Injustice WW yes

No but her blunt force durability is pretty good

Yes and no...not really, but only after she leaves the island and her powers become more full.

It was not until the end of her movie where she was at bullet resistance.

The logic for why she still blocks stuff with her shield, is that she still feels pain from bullets/blasts/beams etc. And they can knock her out. They simply cannot kill her or explicitly wound her to the point of death, I would say some things could even draw blood or incapacitate her for a while.

So that is why I say bullet resistant and not proof.

Yes.

Before people use the anti feat on Themyscira in WW, this was back when she was a fodder. She clearly got more powerful as the movie progressed and built more resistance to piercing types of attacks. This can be shown in shrapnel explosions. This movie was set in World War 1, when shrapnel injuries were extremely common and Diana in the film was in a handful of explosions and wasn't even phased one bit.

Obviously not

She gets penetrated

No

Comic Wonder Woman is not bullet proof, so I don't think DCEU WW is either.

@poeticwarrior: Literally depends on which version.

@nitefall87: Are there any canon versions of WW that are bulletproof?

This thread has been done a million times.

She isn’t, which is ridiculous.

No. I have always wondered, though: I know her skin can not stop bullets but could an ordinary bullet penetrate Comic WW's skull or bones?

Nah not by feats, statements or intent.

I have wondered that myself, but I believe it doesn't!

@hermes1220: How is she bulletproof by feats?

@manlike: She never got hit by sharpnel on-screen. For some reason the bombs did not have them.

no

it

No, she’s not.

Still no

Stop using this dumb shrapnel argument, you look ridiculous

This is from an official interview w/ Patty Jenkins - She's not bulletproof...

Interview Link : http://collider.com/patty-jenkins-wonder-woman-interview/#age

I've posted this on 2 other threads before but I guess a third one cant hurt

@karkus: : Logically, she should be since she has survived being sent flying through debris and explosive shrapnel.

@nwname: They did. Its World War 1. Stop making excuses.

No, no she's not. Shrapnels aren't intended to exist in explosions, the writers only think of a big boom. Jenkins' statement makes it perfectly clear, as well as the fact that Diana actually evades the bullets fired at her instead of letting them bounce off her skin.

Obviously not, or else she wouldn't need to block bullets.

Obviously not...I mean why not block bullets with her palms too like Winter Soldier? Her armor and gear is, but not the skin.

Most probably not

Once we see a bullet hit her skin it'll be clearer but it's safe to say she has garbage piercing durability.

Logically.

she survived the headbutt from JL Superman that also cause crater which took her no signs of damage, not even a slightest bruise.

No

@manlike: Just look at the scenes in slow mo. No shrapnel from an explosion ever hit her. And the bombs used are the types with little to no shrapnel.

No, whether by feats or statements.

The person who needs to constantly dodge and block bullets is bulletproof

@americanspeeddemon:

In the comics? Rebirth only?

She tanks the following, and they are more powerful thank bullets.

@1kingjerry said:

This is from an official interview w/ Patty Jenkins - She's not bulletproof...

Interview Link : http://collider.com/patty-jenkins-wonder-woman-interview/#age

I've posted this on 2 other threads before but I guess a third one cant hurt

This. This is exactly what I said. She can be harmed and even killed by them. But she tanks them better than a normal person. I did forget the accelerated healing factor but that is assumed.

It is odd isn't it though? Maybe bullets are her weakness? Just a random weakness like Lanterns used to be Yellow? Cause she clearly tanks explosions and blows that have greater force than bullets. DCEU or Comics.

@nwname: Look at the one in the final battle with Ares. You can see some springing out.

Thats a shit ton of explosives and you're telling me, in WW1 especially, that theres no shrapnel? Use your common sense and logic bruv

No. The director even stated it. Case closed.

no lmao

@manlike: stop typing and delete your account, you make no sense

not even sure if youre trolling anymore

@manlike: Those were the grenades that did not blow up right away. And watch the scene in slow mo none of those actually impacts WW. So even if you somehow think they are shrapnel they visibly miss her. The grenades Ares threw are not fragment or shrapnel based irl.

@ourmanuel: it’s Tonys alt

i know

hence the "im not even sure if youre trolling anymore" part

ducking hell, y'all are even making me agree with BoF of all people

It seems she is not but it doesnt make sense tbh.

@nitefall87: Energy/ Blunt Force durability isn't always equal to peircing resistance. I think whether or not WW is bullet proof is vague at best. Though she has been stabbed with (seemingly) regular swords before. I think that the writers intend her to be able to be harmed by firearms which is why she blocks them.

@nwname: This is just downright denial at this point. Im sorry but I'm going to have to stop this debate.

No.

Nope. She already was bleeding in WW movie