@worldofthunder said:
@temporal_shift: If he performs a feat like this or on the same level again then sure. But as of now the star feat is about as valid as Black Adam almost one-shotting the Spectre. As of now it's an outlier because he has literally no other feat that comes even close to this. He got knocked out by Sokovia and damaged, he knocked himself out with his own lightning, etc.
#97 Posted byDammeFavour (6832 posts) - 5 hours, 9 minutes ago -
0. If the beam was as powerful as these guys claim, rocket and the dwarf would have been disintegrated plus he was nowhere close to the core. I'm not even sure it was a real star seeing as how they had to restart it
posted by Worldofthunder(2622 posts) - 1 day, 3 hours ago -
@themaximus: Because it's an outlier and a good example of Russos not caring about power levels and honestly having no idea what they're doing when it comes to power levels. Only thing that matters to them is the plot.
I want to say 1 to 2 but have mixed feelings about this feat. I want to see something of these scale again in Avengers 4. I do feel like this is either an outlier or the Russo brothers may not be interested in feats and are more concerned with the plot like Worldofthunder claims. If Thor is strong enough to survive a nuke or a neutron star, where does this put Hela? She easily destroyed Mjolnir , the materials made from a neutron star. She also did this while on Earth and only grew stronger afterwards. Thor didn't get his upgrade in strength/power until after he received Strom Breaker, so until then, he was still as strong as he was in Thor Ragnarok, while Hela was more powerful than Thor the entire Thor Ragnarok movie.
Additionally, if Thor is durable enough to survive a nuke or heat from neutron star, then shouldn't Surtur and Hela still be alive? They were both stronger than Thor and died. I could be wrong on this but I feel like the heat of a neutron star is hotter and more damaging than Surtur's Asgard destroying blast at the end of Thor Ragnarok
Log in to comment