0 or maybe death at 1 . a nuclear bomb is very different from a fake star
lol at this
0 or maybe death at 1 . a nuclear bomb is very different from a fake star
lol at this
said neutron star is under contention and unquantifiable.
The basis of this argument is that what was called a Neutron star is actually a Neutron star.
However, as said object does not appear to have the size, gravitational pull, or rotational speed of a real-life Neutron star, any comparison between the two seems highly suspect. As the supposed 'neutron star' possess none of the qualities of a real-life neutron star, we cannot assume them to be the same.if it was a real neutron star, It would look like this:
said neutron star is under contention and unquantifiable.
The basis of this argument is that what was called a Neutron star is actually a Neutron star.
However, as said object does not appear to have the size, gravitational pull, or rotational speed of a real-life Neutron star, any comparison between the two seems highly suspect. As the supposed 'neutron star' possess none of the qualities of a real-life neutron star, we cannot assume them to be the same.if it was a real neutron star, It would look like this:
hence the rig(advance tech) manipulating the said neutron star
if there is no rig attached to it, you may argue about if thats a neutron star.
@titing2101: which is even more proof that said thing isn't anything like a real neutron star. Hell, that rig could've heavily modified the star, making it even more unquantifiable.
@titing2101: which is even more proof that said thing isn't anything like a real neutron star. Hell, that rig could've heavily modified the star, making it even more unquantifiable.
the rig is there to harness(use) the full force of the star(neutron star), and to do that, we have the rig around the star.
@titing2101: and I will repeat myself
said neutron star is under contention and unquantifiable.
The basis of this argument is that what was called a Neutron star is actually a Neutron star.
However, as said object does not appear to have the size, gravitational pull, or rotational speed of a real-life Neutron star, any comparison between the two seems highly suspect. As the supposed 'neutron star' possess none of the qualities of a real-life neutron star, we cannot assume them to be the same.if it was a real neutron star, It would look like this:
Said star is already nothing like a real neutron star.
@titing2101: and I will repeat myself
said neutron star is under contention and unquantifiable.
The basis of this argument is that what was called a Neutron star is actually a Neutron star.
However, as said object does not appear to have the size, gravitational pull, or rotational speed of a real-life Neutron star, any comparison between the two seems highly suspect. As the supposed 'neutron star' possess none of the qualities of a real-life neutron star, we cannot assume them to be the same.if it was a real neutron star, It would look like this:
Said star is already nothing like a real neutron star.
cause of the rig/advance tech that is containing it.
@titing2101: and how does that rig make this star anything like a real one?
@titing2101: and how does that rig make this star anything like a real one?
the rig doesnt make the neutron star like a real one,
There is a neutron star and they build a rig around it,
because the forge is powered by the power that is harnessed from the neutron star
eitri knows what his using :)
his advance tech can harness the full force of the neutron star.
im really not sure how to make it clearer.
@titing2101: said neutron star is nothing like a real neutron star
said rig is even better proof that said neutron star is nothing like a neutron star
said neutron star is under contention and unquantifiable.
The basis of this argument is that what was called a Neutron star is actually a Neutron star.
However, as said object does not appear to have the size, gravitational pull, or rotational speed of a real-life Neutron star, any comparison between the two seems highly suspect. As the supposed 'neutron star' possess none of the qualities of a real-life neutron star, we cannot assume them to be the same.if it was a real neutron star, It would look like this:
now, are you going to even try proving said star is a neutron star?
@titing2101: said neutron star is nothing like a real neutron star
said rig is even better proof that said neutron star is nothing like a neutron star
said neutron star is under contention and unquantifiable.
The basis of this argument is that what was called a Neutron star is actually a Neutron star.
However, as said object does not appear to have the size, gravitational pull, or rotational speed of a real-life Neutron star, any comparison between the two seems highly suspect. As the supposed 'neutron star' possess none of the qualities of a real-life neutron star, we cannot assume them to be the same.if it was a real neutron star, It would look like this:
now, are you going to even try proving said star is a neutron star?
because they built something around the star.
@brucerogers: Y none? He took the blast of a city(no he didn’t city bust, but he tanked a city sized blast)?
I say at least 2 or 3. The Star was dying so no he can’t take a star. But, surely 2 nukes wouldn’t be out of the question.
@titing2101: a star that doesn't behave like a real one
@jashugan: well a feat is a feat. Fake for you but in that universe it aint.
Neutron star as said in the movie.
Im sure you have a different view it is supes :)
As many as DCEU Supes ie none.
Actually don't think there isn't a limit if he is holding stormbreaker. Instant full heal
why ? Is he limitless now?
@empressofdread: nothing to do with Thor ( I'm not a fanboy ) it's simply that SB healed him instantly from the brink of death in IW. So theoretically he could survive limitless amounts as long as he's holding SB
It's funny, I'm having a fun time reading through all these threads, from Delta going on pure damage control mode, to manonthemountain regurgitating the same debunked arguments over and over again, to people refusing to accept the New Thor and conjuring mental jump loops in logic just to dismiss/discredit him, to people debating fake stars... it's funny.
I'm just sitting here, eating fries with some extra DCEU salt...
:D
@empressofdread: nothing to do with Thor ( I'm not a fanboy ) it's simply that SB healed him instantly from the brink of death in IW. So theoretically he could survive limitless amounts as long as he's holding SB
The meaning of Tanking is without much damage. Like Taking the hits and moving on. Even though he stood up albeit miserable in front of a neutron stars beam it is still however unquantifiable.
You can not assume Thor is now Star level, I am even seeing people claiming Thor is a planet buster now without feats. Its hype.
The thing is Thor will get KOD from a nuke thing about nukes is we can put a great educated guess on how many megatons it can pack its a great quantifiable feat. Thor recovers better than Superman I already said that.
Superman needed solar radiation Stormbreaker does a better job then that based on feats but honestly he is not tanking any nuke just like Superman who never tanked a nuke.
@titing2101: you're right, if it was supes I'd say he would be beyond omnipotence
@empressofdread: um.. yeah that planet busting thread was mine... heh.. XD. And I'm new to the vine, I thought "tanking" meant you could survive. I think he might be able to take 2 without SB healing him
@empressofdread: and for the record.. The only way I see Thor planet busting is via stormbreaker unleashing the full power of the bifrost. Not him destroying a planet by hitting it or something
@jashugan: lol. He already is
@empressofdread: um.. yeah that planet busting thread was mine... heh.. XD. And I'm new to the vine, I thought "tanking" meant you could survive. I think he might be able to take 2 without SB healing him
Ok.
@empressofdread: and for the record.. The only way I see Thor planet busting is via stormbreaker unleashing the full power of the bifrost. Not him destroying a planet by hitting it or something
Yeah, But we still needs feat for that. I know you see Thor planet busting in that manner yet I do not. See, If it happens on screen I will call Thor a planet buster. Also if you say it won't happen because Thor is a good guy, well even Superman is a good guy pretty much all the heroes are good guys yet they do get destructive feats. Feats are important.
@empressofdread: the bifrost can bust a planet but it will take time.. In thor 1 a couple of minutes past before jotenheim starts to rumble but its far from being destroyed
@empressofdread: the bifrost can bust a planet but it will take time.. In thor 1 a couple of minutes past before jotenheim starts to rumble but its far from being destroyed
I agree with you its not planet busting. If you want to see what planet busting looks like google it. I am sure some DBZ gifs or WBH scans will come up in the first result.
Also we need feats, just because Superman is powered by the sun does not mean he is capable of Star level output. He is at moon busting level via feats using your logic he should easily vaporize whole planet yet we have only statements for that no feats.
@empressofdread: yep planet busting is far from our cbm heroes for now. The only thing that comes close is the celestial with pwer stone in gotg
He tanked the neutron star. He should be able to tank all the nukes. What's a mere nuke to power of a neutron star.
In terms of force, he can take atleast somewhere in the ballpark of 10 gigaton(extreme lowball), some around 200 tsar bomb.
In terms of heat, while a nuclear bomb can surpass the core of the sun in terms of heat, it only last for fraction of a second.
Thor tanked the full force and heat of a neutron star for a few minutes, he should be fine.
The real trouble comes from the radiation and the lack of oxygen the nukes will cause, the radiation he might survive due to asgardian physicology, but he will most definitely die from hypoxia.
@katanalauncher: wouldn’t he survive lack of oxygen? I mean, he wasn’t dead when the guardians found his body in space, just knocked out (most likely from the explosion)
@mike_fowler: He would survive for a while, but that much nuke would make the earth inhabitable. And we've seen Thor choke if I recall correctly.
0. If the beam was as powerful as these guys claim, rocket and the dwarf would have been disintegrated plus he was nowhere close to the core. I'm not even sure it was a real star seeing as how they had to restart it
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment