Endgame Thanos replaces Thor against this explosion, what's the damage?

Minimal damage.

Took two snaps. He should survive, but he's getting KO'ed.

K.O.'ed at worst. He'll survive.

KOd

He'd be fine

Staggered arguably hurt but no where close to KOd etc.

Takes it better than Thor

Would be fine if Thor was just knocked out

Probably just staggered. He’s much more durable than Thor.

by feats koed or dead. He energy durability feats are crap

Takes it better than Thor for sure.

@supermanforever: lol wut

What energy durability does he have that comes close to citybusting level?

At worst, KOed like Thor was. But likely won't be considering how wide their durability gap is.

Honestly he probably tanks it, because it only K'od Thor and he didnt suffer any noticeable damage.

@supermanforever: His durability is better than Thor’s. He takes it at least as well as he did.

By feats thors durability is better. Thor tanked a star beam, citybust and many other decent feats. Thanos got none. His best energy feats are the rocket bombing by iron man, captain america lightning strike with mjolnir and thors lightning. Those are decent, but nowhere near the level of what Thor tanked.

I agree he is more durable than thor when it comes to blunt force durability, but he does not come close to thor in terms of energy durability. His feats are just way better.

Writers would most likely intend for his durability to be above Thor, which would warrant him tanking the explosion with minimal injury/remain conscious. However, by feats he has nothing to suggest he can actually survive something that large, and thus by CV Battle forum logic should die

@supermanforever: Thanos took IW Thor's lightning and Iron man's explosions. And the force of an explosion is just regular force. It's not like it was a special type of energy blast, it was just a big explosion. Thanos was stated to be almost impossible to defeat, that explosion wouldn't do the job. And it's not like Thor was at the center of the blast, he was at the top, and from the looks of the video Ironman was right at the bottom and he survived as well.

You can't just go by feats, you have to go by in universe logic.

@alextheboss:

Thanos took IW Thor's lightning and Iron man's explosions.

Thors casual lightning is not that destructive neither is iron mans explosions. Nowhere near tanking Sokovia explosion for sure. Also whats the difference between IW thors lighning and his lightning before? Regardless nowhere near Thors level.

And the force of an explosion is just regular force.

Yep.

It's not like it was a special type of energy blast, it was just a big explosion.

Big explosion=big amount of kinetic energy released. Unless physics has changed.

Thanos was stated to be almost impossible to defeat,

Statments dont equal facts. Almost impossible to defeat? Sure if the ones that faced him were not powerfull? If i send bunch of teletubbies to defeat Thanos then ofc it would also be stated to be impossible task.

that explosion wouldn't do the job.

feats say otherwise.

And it's not like Thor was at the center of the blast,

Yeah, but he was standing on top of the core. So he was probably 30 meter from the center at most.

Ironman was right at the bottom and he survived as well.

Iron man wears titanium armor. Very tough material. Though i agree, there is two ways here. Either the explosion is crap level and people are overestimating it, or Iron man is somehow ridiculously durable.

Overall if we lowball the explosion then yeah thanos might survive it, if not then dont think so because we have not seen much from him.

Or that that city bust was totaly crap and outlier and had not decent potency, which would piss of mcu fans lol.

@supermanforever:

Big explosion=big amount of kinetic energy released. Unless physics has changed.

Thanos has better resistance to kinetic energy than Thor.

Statments dont equal facts. Almost impossible to defeat? Sure if the ones that faced him were not powerfull? If i send bunch of teletubbies to defeat Thanos then ofc it would also be stated to be impossible task.

There was only 1 possible way out of millions for a bunch of super heroes to defeat Thanos.

feats say otherwise.

Show me a feat of an explosion weaker than that taking out Thanos. If you can't then I think what you meant to say was a lack of feats say otherwise, which isn't the same thing.

Iron man wears titanium armor. Very tough material. Though i agree, there is two ways here. Either the explosion is crap level and people are overestimating it, or Iron man is somehow ridiculously durable.

I think the explosion is overestimated. It doesn't take much to make a clump of ground falling through the air to fall apart.

Or that that city bust was totaly crap and outlier and had not decent potency, which would piss of mcu fans lol.

This is probably true.

bump, could Hulk survive it?

Yes because Hulk is also more durable than Thor.

Laughs it off

Isn't a completed Infinity Gauntlet (and donning/wielding it without your arm constantly burning itself off) an extremely good energy durability feat, given the description given by Hulk in Endgame?

Thanos tanked it in IW (first donning, then wielding) without actually taking significant damage until the snap, unlike Hulk (whose arm was immediately and continuousl being disintegrated just by wearing it).

I believe there was mention of energy that could power a continent in Endgame, too.