Avatar image for haydenclaireheroes
Posted by haydenclaireheroes (11984 posts) - - Show Bio

Tell me what you guys think:

Avatar image for wolfrazer
#1 Posted by Wolfrazer (16182 posts) - - Show Bio

I mean, do we need any movie?

Avatar image for mrmonster
#2 Posted by mrmonster (15124 posts) - - Show Bio

I really don't think that the "his past needs to be a mystery" thing is as big a deal as people think it is. Jack Nicholson's Joker origin was made very clear in Batman (1989) and his Joker was still great, possibly the 2nd best behind Heath Ledger. Jeremiah Valeska's origin on Gotham is clear, and he's a fan favorite. I really don't think knowing his origin in this movie will take anything away from the character.

Avatar image for theparadox
#3 Posted by TheParadox (844 posts) - - Show Bio

No, this movie's just a cashgrab. It might be a good one though.

Avatar image for doom_phd
#4 Posted by Doom_Phd (1539 posts) - - Show Bio

@theparadox: A low budget joker movie is a cash grab without Batman involved? Now I’ve read everything

Avatar image for mrtrey
#5 Posted by MrTrey (301 posts) - - Show Bio

Every movie is pointless.

Avatar image for tormentedraven2000
#6 Posted by TormentedRaven2000 (14 posts) - - Show Bio

"If i'm going to have a past, I prefer it to be multiple choice." This version of the Joker's origin isn't going to be the final knot that ties everything together for the character. There even points that show that Heath Ledgers Joker was making up parts of his past as well. When he's speaking to Gambol he tells him that his Father was an abusive fiend and gave him the scars, but when hes threatening Rachael at Bruce's Party for Harvey he tells her a completely different story. He says that his wife was caught deep with loan sharks and couldn't pay up so they carve up her face. He wants her to feel better so he cuts up his own. In Tim Burton's Batman he wanted to write the Joker a bit different so he had Jack kill Bruce's Parents in the movie. In Gotham there were two possibilities of the Joker in the show, one being Jeremiah and the other Jerome. But both characters in the show both embody how the joker is in the comic, Jeremiah has his crazy and fun psychopathic personality, while Jerome has his intellect and cold hateful nature. Joker is an idea but it shouldn't matter how his origin story is given for the story. Its an adaptation.

Avatar image for s1ckb0y
#7 Posted by s1ckb0y (777 posts) - - Show Bio

No one 'needs' a movie, but it's nice to see a villain finally get a movie.

Avatar image for deactivated-5ca94ac6d594d
#8 Posted by deactivated-5ca94ac6d594d (55 posts) - - Show Bio

I don't think any character needs a movie, but if is a good one(Which looks to be the case by the trailers so far), then it's always something welcomed for me.

Avatar image for the_stegman
#9 Edited by the_stegman (40187 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man didn't need a movie, look how that turned out.

Batman didn't need a reboot with Begins.

The Avengers didn't need a movie.

No movie needs to be made, people don't know what they want til it's given to them.

Moderator
Avatar image for the_titan_lord
#10 Posted by The_Titan_Lord (9143 posts) - - Show Bio

🤣

Avatar image for bag_ass
#11 Posted by Bag_ass (301 posts) - - Show Bio

Not the joker we need but the one we deserve

Avatar image for theparadox
#12 Posted by TheParadox (844 posts) - - Show Bio

@doom_phd: 1. Due to its low budget, it's low risk, and the profit they get would most likely be higher than if it was high budget

2. It's a completely random movie that doesn't even fit into the continuity. If it fails, it may not effect other properties

3. It stars one of the most iconic characters of all time

Sounds like a cashgrab to me.

Avatar image for supermanthor
#13 Posted by Supermanthor (18774 posts) - - Show Bio

@bag_ass said:

Not the joker we need but the one we deserve

Online
Avatar image for invadedtbd
#14 Posted by InvadedTBD (1536 posts) - - Show Bio

Didn't like any part of that trailer. Smh. This movie is unnecessary.

Avatar image for lan_fan
#15 Posted by Lan_Fan (13128 posts) - - Show Bio

I find her videos to be unnecessary, as I don't care about her opinion.

I bet one of you will reply "Oh, if you don't like her, then don't watch her videos." Yes, exactly what I'm trying to say.

Avatar image for rustlingjimmy
#16 Posted by Rustlingjimmy (1126 posts) - - Show Bio

no but I'm not mad

Avatar image for unusedusername
#17 Posted by Unusedusername (69 posts) - - Show Bio

@theparadox: By that logic every comic book movie is a cashgrab, especially now more than ever.

Avatar image for alextheboss
#18 Posted by AlexTheBoss (17391 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for mylittlefascist
#19 Posted by MyLittleFascist (31561 posts) - - Show Bio

@lan_fan said:

I find her videos to be unnecessary, as I don't care about her opinion.

I bet one of you will reply "Oh, if you don't like her, then don't watch her videos." Yes, exactly what I'm trying to say.

But the topic of the thread wasn't the video, it was "do you think joker needs a movie". Also "her" is the OP of the thread. lol

Avatar image for lan_fan
#20 Edited by Lan_Fan (13128 posts) - - Show Bio

@mylittlefascist: Then I said exactly what I needed to say. Nobody needs a movie, if you want to make a movie/video, just make it. If you're interested to watch things, then watch them. If you're not interested to watch them, then don't watch them. Saying that Joker doesn't need a movie is the same as saying the movie is not needed in general, correct? I'm saying why the concept of "it's not needed, so it shouldn't be there" is stupid.

Just for the record, I don't agree with what I said. It's meant to be ironic. I'm all support for comic book videos on YouTube. It's the same like controversy in 2013 or so when people were mad that Pewdiepie was getting big, saying his videos are unnecessary, stupid. THEN DON'T WATCH HIS VIDEOS. That's stupid, correct? If you think what I said was stupid and harsh, it's because it's meant to be stupid.

Also, I'm not against criticism. This is different than seeing a movie that actually interests you, but the movie ends up disappointing. That's where criticism is needed. I'm just mad because "We don't need this movie" shouldn't be a thing. It's exactly as stupid as "I don't need your YouTube channel, so this shouldn't exist" that I said earlier.

Avatar image for mrnoital
#21 Posted by Mrnoital (8027 posts) - - Show Bio

@theparadox: cashgrabs are movies that serve no other purpose that taking in money, this is a hard r rated movie meaning limited audience, from what we're can see it'll be a low action artistic character study kind of movie

Calling it a cash grab is laughable

Avatar image for doom_phd
#22 Posted by Doom_Phd (1539 posts) - - Show Bio

@theparadox:

1) it’s not a low risk, it’s high risk which is why it’s a low budget film.

2) which is why it’s not a cash grab

3) only one iconic character is in this movie.

You want to see what a cash grab is? I point you towards Antman and the Wasp. This isn’t one

Avatar image for stormshadow_x
#23 Posted by StormShadow_X (16680 posts) - - Show Bio

I know a lot of people like the line about the Joker not knowing his origin but that's BS. It's very clear that the origin in the killing joke was his origin and it was referenced consistently after the story happened. The Joker has a real origin people and I don't believe it takes away from his character though I can see why some people do

On topic - No one needs a movie, until it's made

Avatar image for anthp2000
#24 Posted by ANTHP2000 (26816 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man didn't need a movie, look how that turned out.

Batman didn't need a reboot with Begins.

The Avengers didn't need a movie.

No movie needs to be made, people don't know what they want til it's given to them.

Avatar image for galactic_1000
#25 Posted by Galactic_1000 (5625 posts) - - Show Bio

No movies needs to be made.

Avatar image for spareheadone
#26 Posted by SpareHeadOne (6080 posts) - - Show Bio

I don't like the sympathy for the joker that occurs with his story. I think he should have been born an evil little Psycho and gradually gotten cleverer and more evil as he found ingenious ways of getting away with more and more. I find it hard to hate him when he is the victim of terrible treatment.

Avatar image for greenroost
#28 Posted by greenroost (1381 posts) - - Show Bio

no

Avatar image for jake_fury
#29 Edited by jake_fury (188 posts) - - Show Bio

DC can say they did a villain movie first.

Avatar image for eternalcelestial
#30 Edited by EternalCelestial (90 posts) - - Show Bio

I don't think villains should have their own movies, it's kinda pointless.

Avatar image for essem
#31 Posted by Essem (287 posts) - - Show Bio

When it comes to CBM properties/characters there are always risk involved regardless of budget. A "low" budget Joker movie, its certainly not low budget in terms of the average movie, but lower than a typical action blockbuster sure. But anyway, when your using a CBM character like the Joker you are risking the future of the character.

The amount of money BvS has lost for Warner Brothers are way way higher than the movie itself (which didnt loose money but just making a point). A bad movie makes people loose interest in future installments, which takes time to build up again. If the Joker movie is terrible, then Joker itself wont have the draw that he used to have (money lost) when used in future movies.

Avatar image for the_impersonator
#32 Posted by The Impersonator (8477 posts) - - Show Bio

Why not? It's time to see a villain's solo movie.