Do feats have to follow real world science in movies?

Movie don't follow real world science at all

No. Unless the writers are willing to go full-on hard sci-fi, being more scientifically accurate won't make the movie any better or worse, and won't make the feat cooler. I say this as someone who loves both science and hard sci-fi.

Pretty much spot on.

Feats would be impossible to compare at that point. When a feat is given context in the script it’s best to go with what the writers intended to portray.

Yeah, otherwise dumb viners here can’t take the time to fan calc everything.

No, it's called "fiction" for a reason.

If the fiction has its own definition and representation of what a lightning, or a black hole, or a nuke is then no.

Otherwise you cannot claim that something is a lightning, or black hole, or a nuke when it doesn't behave like one.

Of course.....we wouldn't have anything to discuss otherwise. Every discussion would end with 'because comucs'

No. I don't think people realize how far things are from making sense in a CBM. Logically when someone flies and lifts a large object they should automatically fly through it. Or if they are on the ground their entire body should automatically be pushed straight down into the ground. Or if they punch someone and send them flying they should go flying themselves.

To many things don't make perfect sense. We'd have to ignore the majority of feats.

But while I don't think we should discredit every feat due to science I also think some feats are too far. Some just go beyond my suspension of disbelief. Sometimes it's so crazy that I think the filmmakers simply didn't have any clue what they where talking about or they didn't mean what they seemed to mean. Especially if it's say a random detail and not something that has significant emphasis put on it.

For instance it's very difficult for me to buy into the 300 DB feat for DCEU Superman. I honestly think the filmmakers must not have known what they where talking about when they said that.

It should have some minimum level of real world science otherwise the feat would contradict itself.

Obviously not.

No, that's why its called fiction

Nuke that Superman took was weak and because it was in space it doesn't count tho. Thor >>>>>> Superman.