From the producer himself!
This was very obvious but now we have official confirmation, It can't be denied anymore, such a perfect timing.
Well. Can't even make the "potential" argument now. Maria has far less power output than Mark I Iron Man
God this is worse than the statue stuff.
Well. Can't even make the "potential" argument now. Maria has far less power output than Mark I Iron Man
God this is worse than the statue stuff.
???, How does this even make sense?, Do you not know what "absorption" means ?
She's already been equated to 616 CM so idek what you're trying to suggest anyways.
Maria before she got 'siphoned' still got knocked down by a thrown statue
Well. Can't even make the "potential" argument now. Maria has far less power output than Mark I Iron Man
God this is worse than the statue stuff.
Hmm, as she managed to survive all that siphoned power being directed back at her, then either
a] power in the quote is referring to the blast and not all of her power, which means the death is legit
b] power in the quote is referring to all of her power, and it is so insignificant that depowered Maria can withstand it, whereas she cannot withstand a statue
But undoubtedly the statement means that Wanda had to cheat because she could not dispatch Maria in a straight up clash of raw power, which seems to be the case on-screen.
@rajjarsalt: Getting strained by blasts that can’t even go through 2 layers of rubble.
Damn that possessed Wanda was nerfed.
b] power in the quote is referring to all of her power, and it is so insignificant that depowered Maria can withstand it, whereas she cannot withstand a statue.
Help!, Where did you get this from?💀, rewatch the scene, Wanda was simultaneously defending against CM going all out in a clash and absorbing her powers at the same time, after Wanda had done that, she ricocheted the blast she was clashing against by overpowering it, which was what caused the explosion showing us just how much power maria was dispensing the whole time, nowhere is it implied that it is Maria's whole power which doesn't make any sense as wanda doesn't need to release absorbed power or energy.
But undoubtedly the statement means that Wanda had to cheat because she could not dispatch Maria in a straight up clash of raw power, which seems to be the case on-screen.
But she did tho, we literally saw her do that on the screen causing maria to fly back. Also it is canon that 838 wanda was depowered in comparison to 616 Wanda here.
Maria before she got 'siphoned' still got knocked down by a thrown statue
A statue thrown with the AP of Wanda and coated by her energy, clearly shown in the movie.
Trying to Manipulate the canon context again, as usual.
@aystarr: Thanos neg diffed bigger debris she threw in EG.
I have never seen anyone cope so hard for fodder.
As seen here Wanda is only encasing the top of the statue in energy to lift it
As seen again. Only energy encasing the bottom of the statue. The rest is standard Wanda energy trails
Even all the way at the end, energy only covering the bottom of the statue in order to lift it. There's no evidence she amped it's AP and even then her AP isn't impressive, her hacks are.
What is even the point of this? It's a random CM variant with what? 10 mins of screen time and 5 lines? Who cares if shes fodder?
@aystarr: Thanos neg diffed bigger debris she threw in EG.
Neg diffed? Man was dropped to his knees & pushed back
Bigger debris? This statue looks bigger & faster
@aystarr: Thanos neg diffed the bigger debris she threw in EG.
How is this relevant here?,
Thanos did not neg diff anything. He actually had time to prepare for the attack, being able to deflect the first with his weapon, which he did with issues, and he still got knocked down to his knees with this hands on the floor after the second.
Unlike captain marvel who was blindsided by Wanda's attack while in a clash with her.
Which at the end of it all, still isn't relevant here as all we know of 838 Wanda is that she's a depowered version of current 616 Wanda when possessed with no specification to what level so trying to make a comparison by using EG Wanda level is not gonna work without more info.
Once again, you've shown you have no idea what you're talking about and/or you're intentionally manipulating context to fit your false narrative. @ me when you want to make reasonable claims.
There's no evidence she amped it's AP and even then her AP isn't impressive
Ah yes, An attack from a morals off Wanda in a win by any means, death battle would not have her AP, 2000 level IQ play there bro. Einstein is quaking. 🤓
We're calling Wanda's AP unimpressive now uh?.
As seen again. Only energy encasing te bottom of the statue. The rest is standard Wanda energy trails
"Standard energy trails" , the dude said as Wanda held position for the entirety of the attack that destroyed anything in it's path.
Pls get off my thread if you don't have anything reasonable to say.
Ah yes, An attack from a morals off Wanda in a win by any means, death battle would not have her AP
Nice headcanon. let's humour it. Pray tell what AP does possessed Wanda have? The one who's blasts barely dent the floor? The idea she enhances the AP of the objects she throws is headcanon.
We're calling Wanda's AP unimpressive now uh?.
It ain't her best feature. Even her blasts at Kamar Taj were only around grenade level. Her main asset is actual TK not her blasts.
"Standard energy trails"
Well since I actually pay attention to the movies I notice that all of Wandas TK attacks leave trails behind them. It's just standard for her.
@greysentinel365: Ok, you can keep denying canon all you want, your hate for the characters would get you nowhere lol.
@aystarr: Ok, you can keep denying canon all you want, your wanking of this character will get you nowhere lol.
Her main asset is actual TK not her blasts.
Her blast aren't grenade level if they can do this:
Do people still not get how telekinesis works in fiction? An object that is thrown with TK is as strong as the TK user. Always has been, always will be for the majority of cases.
So the downplay with the statue is stupid tbh.
The coping for Maria being fodder is just sad honesty. No one calls her fodder because they hate Wanda aystarr.
Ah yes, it's because they hate the movie and writing so they discredit everything and every character in it.
Wanda actually has great feats. People call Maria fodder because she factually is.
"She factually is", A random dude on CV says as the actual producers of the movie hype her as one of the strongest heroes, give her the same origin of power as MCU 616 Danvers CM and movie shows she lasts longer than anyone, including strange, against Wanda.
Her and the rest of the Illuminati showed nothing of worth. They're fodder plain and simple.
Ah yes, statements and comparisons don't matter anymore, Odin fodder, Kang fodder.
@vegito315: that wasn’t carol without her powers. that was her with her powers dampened. wanda genuinely drained 838 marvel’s powers to a point where she had severely hindered durability as it’s phrased in the quote
She’s fodder. Get over it
@greysentinel365: Ok, you can keep denying canon all you want, your hate for the characters would get you nowhere lol.
makes sense. anyone that says something lowballing maria now will be scoffed at
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment