In a Battle/Fight does everyone think that BFR(Battle Field Removal) should count as a victory/win or not?
BFR
Absolutely not. A BFR to me is only acceptable if there's no way to win, but you need to end the fight. most people count it as a "claimed" victory.
Depends on your point of view. I'm sure we've all been in a fight that some people thought you won, and some people thought you lost. WWH vs Juggernaut I think is a good example. Alot of people say it was a cowardly thing to do. I disagree and say it was a very smart thing to do and showed Hulk as being more then just a brawler.
He used the ring out on Juggs and to me, its a victory. The Hulk wasn't there to get into a no holds never ending through down, he was after Xavier. To me it showed Hulk actually taking a minute to figure out a tactical solution to stop Juggs. These aren't commissioned bouts, its life or death and you do what you have to do. If that means using the ring out on somebody so be it.
I guess its a matter of opinion, there really is no right answer for this (in my opinion)
I look at it as just another tactic to use. Why on gods green earht would you sit and bang with someone when you could jsut fly/punch/tp etc somewhere else nad be done with it.
WWH vs Juggs was a great example of this (likegambler said) and IMO gives Hulk the win in that fight. People who think bfr is not a win or a sound strategy pretty much admits that thier fighter is just a dumb brute who cant do anything but bang.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment