Better Villain: MCU Thanos or Fox Apocalypse

What character had the more complex and cooler build up for the movies, was it the MCU Thanos or was it The X-Men movies version of Apocalypse, who is the more interesting villain?.

Thanos ,

Apocalypse wasted Oscar Isaac talents.

Thanos easily.

Thanos in a heartbeat.

Thanos stomps

Apocolypse

His plan actually made sense

And he wasn’t a wimp

Why make these threads if then answer is obvious and literally no one will pick the other

Apocolypse sucked in that movie. Soooo bad!

This. Apocalypse solos everyone present in the Endgame final battle as well. The only survivors would be the chosen horsemen.

Thanos

Thanos no contest. Apocalypse was just powerful, but offered little else to be a compelling villain. They went the generic villain route with him unfortunately. Thanos is unique enough that people debate about him and have a variety of views on him. Apocalypse can be summed up with a sentence or two and people would move on.

Thanos stomps for once lol. Apoc may be powerful,but he ain't a compelling character

I actually liked Apoc but come on.

Thanos easily.

Apoc was boring.

He was basically doing what Magneto wanted to do in the first 3 X-men except he had no character.

They both suck.

Thanos

Thanos is one of the few characters who's movie iteration is generally better liked than his comic iteration

Thanos stomps.

Thanos easily.

@marvelx13: yes

Lmfao Thanks by a landslide. Thanos is already one of the GOAT villains of all time. As a Apocalypse fan his movie incarnation was an insult to his fan base.

Smh dceu fans always bringing a battle into this