Based on best feats, who is more durable: MCU Thor or DCEU Superman?

I included Sokovia because he survives the explosion.

Thor

inb4 “he ran from bullets”

Thor by far.

Thor for energy, Superman for blunt force.

@danii79: those didn't happen remember? We just like ignoring consistency for outliers

@DammeFavour: @danii79:

How does Thor getting hurt by most of these characters matter? Their attacks would just scale to Thor's durability.

The only exception is probably Phase 1 Iron Man, considering he was supposed to be vulnerable to things like normal F-22 missiles and machine guns.

@starsprime3: In which durability tier do you think Thor is?

@danii79: I am unsure. Why does that matter though?

@starsprime3: Just wanna know your viewpoint.

@danii79: I suppose possibly city level if Sokovia explosion happened right where Thor hit the Vibranium core. While the floating Sokovia was small, the rest of the rocky landmass was also destroyed.

I think there are some other feats higher than Sokovia feat but those might be a little on the outlandish side, so not sure if they count.

@starsprime3: Thor in a1 and the final battle of a2 was weaken by dark energy etc

Blunt: Superman

Piercing: Superman

Energy: Superman due to Nuke feat

@starsprime3: Do you think Thor could survive a nuke?

@danii79: A hit with from a 1 megaton warhead would atomize him.

They're practically equal. Superman was literally not dripping blood from a nuke to the face but Thor survived Sokovia pre-Awakening.

@chuggachugga170: based on, there literally was no difference in his stats from thor 1 to a1 and he never encountered dark energy in a2

sokovia=nuke which nearly killed SM. bifrost >doomsday's blunt force output

@DammeFavour: I believe either commentary or script said something about the pool draining him and it’s impressive considering that a weakened thor can still bend gold titanium which is a 1k ton+ feat

@DammeFavour:

Yes the same way there wasn't any difference between MOS Supes and JL Supes right? Just keep ignoring onscreen evidence and use only lowshowings as your basis for durability so your god dceu superman won't lose.

@supermod111:

But I suppose dceu Clark can tank a 1megaton warhead, right?

@johndeyvido: are you actually comparing a kryptonian to an asgardian? The kryptonian power source is external so they can get stronger or weaker depending on the amount of solar radiation in their system.

And no superman didn't get stronger, he just got better feats, this is reinforced by the fact that zod was able to match him in MoS after less than a day of solar exposure and how he was able to get back to full power in about 2 minutes after the nuke sapped his solar radiation.

The only thing thor got better at was electricity manipulation. Stop reaching

@DammeFavour:

His power source is irrelevant to the comparison.

Hulk was able to give Thor a nosebleed with one punch and later on the same Thor could take over a dozen or so of the same punch without a scratch but yet you insist that he is on the same level.

The only thing that dceu Supes got on Thor in stat is that he incorporates his speed better when fighting compared to Thor sth you guys tag combat speed.

@johndeyvido: are we talking about the same thor that was hallucinating daddy so yes he didn't get stronger, if anything this hulk didn't appear as powerful as he was in AoU.

The thing superman has on thor is speed both travel and combat because we can prove that thor doesn't move any faster than chris Hemsworth and superman has supersonic combat speed, we can also prove that the fastest thor can fly is around mach 1 proven by his desperation trying to escape from the dragon in ragnarok. We know he doesn't hit as hard same way I know all might and DCAU superman hit alot harder than superman.

Superman is also better in durability because even zod hits alot harder than thanos

Superman has better feats.

I agree that Superman is far more durable overall when you look Blunt, Piercing and Energy.

Thor is closest with the latter though, due to his heat feat in IW when stormbreaker was being forged. The other areas, not so much

Sokovia>

That's a yellow star, Clark gets more powerful and comes out golden.

Blunt: Superman

Energy: probably Thor (debatable tho)

Piercing: Superman

So overall I'll go with Superman

Superman. We have had people on here do precise calcs for Thor's star feat. It was slightly weaker than Superman's nuke feat.

Basically.

@DammeFavour:

His father came to him in a vision not that he was losing consciousness as a result of the beatings since he was about to punch Hulk off himself.

Kurse did the same thing and Thor wasn't even close to being KO'ed and Kurse is atleast as strong as Hulk if not stronger.

Hulk wasn't as powerful??? That Hulk got his best feat to date in the same movie, moving EF Surtur so that "weaker" narrative is DOA.

So dceu Clark is faster than Thor's teleportarion? His hammer? Mach 1 my foot. Like I've said before, combat speed is a CV construct so I won't bother arguing about that. Speed is speed, no one becomes slower when fighting even normal human can punch faster than they can run but sure whatever you say..

Any unbiased viner know that mcu high-tiers are stronger and have better striking than dceu kryptonians going by onscreen feats but as a dceu Clark fanboy you would disagree even if Thor breaks apart a planet.

Dceu Clark have not taken more than 3 hits at a go in all his movie appearances and you want to compare him to Thor taking a beating from someone stronger than him.

You are also confusing Clark's skin not showing cuts or bruises as a sign he's more durable than Thor, so I guess dceu Clark is also more durable than CW Supergirl or smallville superman since both of them have been bruised and bloodied by punches.

@johndeyvido: I mean if that makes you feel better, he was hallucinating mate coupled with the fact that we know Odin is dead. Did you watch the Kurse fight, dude looked like he was going to die, go to 1:30

https://youtu.be/ZJneSSYTZFo

You mean how surtur was surprised and took a step back? Reinforced by the fact that hulk was continously hitting him and couldn't budge him at all?

We are talking about stuff used in battle right? He can't teleport, the bifrost is not useful in battle, mjolnir on its own can go MHS because of its small size and surface area, add thor's size with his higher surface area and the drag involved and yes it's still mach 1, stop reaching or prove he's beyond mach 1. No combat speed is not a CV construct, I mean its not difficult to understand, Mike Tyson vs usain bolt comes to mind, two different types of speed.

Yea any unbiased viner watches Clark vs zod and watches thor vs hela, thanos and Kurse and concludes hey the MCU fights are more intense. You're going to claim moving the rings and I'll tell you rocket's ship did the work, replace thor with a durable enough anchor and same thing happens.

Did you watch his fight against zod before making up that blatant lie or heh the smallville fight? How can you say he's not taken more than 3 hits in one go, even zod and nam-ek have taken that, would you like references to that? Now you just have to prove that just because thanos is stronger than thor makes him stronger than zod considering you can't provide actual empirical onscreen visual evidence that would confirm that assumption.

Except we know how much stress thor's body can take seeing as we've seen him bloodied up with two gashes on his head after having a boulder thrown at him contrasted by the fact that superman went through a much more durable structure in the top of a mountain and got up like nothing happened, later in that movie, he fell from space like nothing happened. Lol because we know for a fact the things that bloodied those characters would completely destroy this clark even considering the limited budget which the MCU doesn't have

The Man of Steel and it ain't hard to tell.

Thor.

@danii79: I agree, but don't downplay Supes. He has loads of impressive feats

and Superman has shown himself to be within the high tiers of the MCU

@kryptonianking88: U can't say you didn't try.

@danii79: nah man. Supes has loads more I coulda brought up. Wayne Tech bullets only feel like 60 mph baseballs to him, concrete busting punches from Nam Ek and Faora only leave him on the ground for a couple seconds, an oil rig falling on him didn't kill him, and a gas station explosion only winds him for 30 seconds.

Reviewing these feats, I should've voted for Supes. He's got way better feats than getting KTFO by a big exploding rod or getting left near dead by sun light.

@kryptonianking88: You better show me where Thor has no-sold things like those and I will change my mind.

If not I can show you a certain fight where Superman and his enemy where punching each other through skyscrapers and they were totally unfaced by it.

@danii79: I'm not sure what your point is, you just showed some instances of Thor getting hurt, or moved by attacks like Iron Man. It would be a feat for everyone except Iron Man to hurt Thor (Iron Man wasn't even slowing him down).

Anyways, here are some instances of Thor no selling better stuff

Thor travelling MFTL no sells the Bifrost against his head, the same thing decapitated a dragon which could fly through rock

Thor tanks a blast which earlier disintegrated the superhuman King Laufey. It takes building level energy just to do the same to normal humans.

No specific instance of something falling on top of Thor, but this is comparable. Iron Man at worst was KO'd with no major damage to his suit. Thor is more durable than Iron Man

@kryptonianking88:

Arguments like yours aren't allowed on comicvine so delete it.

You are only supposed to use lowshowings for mcu characters but highest showings for dceu characters especially kryptonians.

@kryptonianking88:

Lmao. Superman has tanked stronger attacks and came unscathed. The mountain top is> whatever blunt durability feat Slowdinson has.

A rock made him bleed. Superman took a train which didn't even break on impact, directly to the face and was unscathed.

About the snap, You keep saying that and acting like repeating it with no evidence makes it any more compelling than the first time you said it. Thor was KOd by a much weaker explosion.

Nukes can get 20 times hotter than the cores of (real) stars, he took it while being weakened. Let's not talk about how a (less) weakened Superman took an explosion which busted an entire island.

But hey, Iron Man is now>Superman according to you!

Please stop using the bifrost feat.

@johndeyvido: it’s not even that. People use instances of characters merely getting moved to lowball the MCU when the same happens several times in DCEU

@authentical: Dani was bringing up what he thought were low ends for Thor I brought up some actual low ends for Superman. Which isn’t even the point of this thread OP asked who has better durability just off their best feats