Zabuza & Haku vs Kisame

Part 1 versions for all

Zabuza has his sword

Haku can use Ice Mirrors

No Samehada

Takes place at The Great Naruto Bridge

In Character

Morals off

Fight to the death

Kisame still

Kisame, pretty easily.

mismatch

Lol....Kisame one hands.

Kisame stomps. If KN0 Naruto can break Haku's mirrors then Kisame should no issue doing so. Zabuza loses too, the only he was able to fight Kakashi as well as he did was because Kakashi had to also protect four other people, not to mention he was rusty iirc.

Kisame loses, he has zero Part 1 feats essentially and completely none without Samehada.

^^^^^^What this guy said. Kisame loses without Samehada.

Anyone early Shippuden Kakashi level and above solos.

Kisame low-mid difficulty due to not having Samehada.

Kisame wins pretty easily.

@bdelloidgrain2@alextheboss How does Kisame win this if we go by his Part 1 feats alone lol?

@limitlesssigil: It says part 1 version, not part one feats. I doubt Kissame got much stronger over the time skip.

Kisame

Kisame stomps.

Kisame

Kisame is underrated he's called the tailless tails Beast, the dude has enough Chakra to rival a tailed Beast

Kisame wins even with out his sword he is still physically superior 2 either of them on top of having boat loads more chakara then anybody here

@alextheboss said:

What's the point of even stating the version if we're allowed to use all of his feats?

Zabuza was considered the strongest of the swordsmen of the original swordsmen not the new age swordsmen with kisame. Kisame without Samehada and fused form was arguably stronger than the swordsmen indivually for beating Fugiki, the original owner of Samehada and original member of the 7 swordsmen.

So kisame should take this. Haku is far outclassed in power and speed by Kisame. Zabuza saying haku was stronger than himself is PIS and makes no sense. How could Haku be on par with Zabuza, when haku was nearly stalemated by Inexperienced Sharingan 1 Tomoe Sasuke, and Zabuza was almost equal to Sharingan 3 Tomoe Kakashi.

@limitlesssigil: The better question is why use part 1 if part 1 Kissame has piratically now feats in the first place? You could argue he got a bit stronger, but with no stated power up he should be of similar strength as before. He was still portrayed to be above Kakashi who was above Zabuza, and add it the fact he has Samehada and can fuse with his sword he should definitely win, even if he is a bit weaker than he was in part 2.

@alextheboss said:

Kisame

Kisame bodies honestly.

@limitlesssigil: Without Samehada I can see him having trouble, but even in part one he had the advantage over Asuma, was hit by a direct hit by Guy with no damage, and him and Itachi were up against four Zabuza level opponents, and those four were scared, meaning Itachi and Kisame should at least be worth around two of them, as if they weren't they could have just beat them then and there.

@alextheboss said:

Ehh, saying Asuma and Kurenai are equal to Guy and Kakashi is a stretch.