Yoda and Mace Windu (ROTS) vs The Emperor and Darth Vader (ROTJ)

Avatar image for jueix
Jueix

2769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No Caption Provided
No Caption Provided

No Caption Provided

Canon Fight

Fight takes place here:

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The Sith win, either of the Jedi could defeat Vader but Palpatine is the MVP.

Avatar image for crater_maker
Crater_Maker

1310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Crater_Maker

Jedi. Windu takes on Sidious again and at the very...VERY least stalls him until Yoda stomps the Orphan/Widower

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The Sith win, either of the Jedi could defeat Vader but Palpatine is the MVP.

No they can't Vader is way more powerful than Either of them in canon.

This isn't legends where it too ambiguous, about his power and it gets contradicted, in Canon he is solidly ROTJ Sidious near Equal.

in Canon it pretty much implied the Siths Vader and Sidious are the most powerful.

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000: Vader isn't more powerful than Yoda in legends or canon and Mace could still arguably take a majority over him.

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000: Vader isn't more powerful than Yoda in legends or canon and Mace could still arguably take a majority over him.

Legends is debatable, But in canon Says who?

you tell me where it states Vader isn't more powerful than Yoda in canon.

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"Legends is debatable" It's not at all.

"you tell me where it states Vader isn't more powerful than Yoda in canon." Are there statements holding Vader above Yoda?

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By MyGod000

@mygod000:

"Legends is debatable" It's not at all.

"you tell me where it states Vader isn't more powerful than Yoda in canon." Are there statements holding Vader above Yoda?

I been showing you statements then you guys dismiss them because you want to cherry pick Canon and what you want to accept as canon. it doesn't work that way.

it's debate in Legends because ROTJ Vader Surpassed the power that Anakin had in ROTS Which was arguable on par or greater than ROTS Sidious who Yoda lost to.

in canon, Vader 5 years after ROTS Surpassed Anakin in power; and was stated to be the most powerful Sith.

Vader in canon is par with ROTJ Sidious, who is much more powerful than ROTS Sidious. Moreover, Sidious stated Vader is a suitable replacement for him in the dark side. in order for that to be he would at least need to be more powerful than ROTS Sidious, since the Sidious who made that statement is more powerful than ROTS Counter part.

Avatar image for superoperative
superoperative

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sith win.

Vader>Mace

Sidious>Yoda

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By dalootajr

@mygod000: "it's debate in Legends because ROTJ Vader Surpassed the power that Anakin had in ROTS Which was arguable on par or greater than ROTS Sidious who Yoda lost to." George Lucas has said that Vader isn't as strong as Anakin and Yoda would annihilate Suited Vader in legends.

"in canon, Vader 5 years after ROTS Surpassed Anakin in power; and was stated to be the most powerful Sith."

"From then on, [Vader] wasn't as strong as the Emperor."

-- George Lucas

As for the Jedi : Fallen Order statement you love to use, Its most likely either Hyperbole or referring to known Sith in the galaxy, as Palpatine wasn't known as a sith. No way Palpatine is weaker than Vader.

"Sidious stated Vader is a suitable replacement for him in the dark side". "From then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor – he was like Darth Maul or Count Dooku. He wasn't what he was supposed to become. But the son could become that." - George Lucas

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By MyGod000

@dalootajr said:

@mygod000: "it's debate in Legends because ROTJ Vader Surpassed the power that Anakin had in ROTS Which was arguable on par or greater than ROTS Sidious who Yoda lost to." George Lucas has said that Vader isn't as strong as Anakin and Yoda would annihilate Suited Vader in legends.

"in canon, Vader 5 years after ROTS Surpassed Anakin in power; and was stated to be the most powerful Sith."

"From then on, [Vader] wasn't as strong as the Emperor."

-- George Lucas

As for the Jedi : Fallen Order statement you love to use, Its most likely either Hyperbole or referring to known Sith in the galaxy, as Palpatine wasn't known as a sith. No way Palpatine is weaker than Vader.

Sidious stated Vader is a suitable replacement for him in the dark side. "From then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor – he was like Darth Maul or Count Dooku. He wasn't what he was supposed to become. But the son could become that." - George Lucas

this is Canon star wars. George Lucas Statements means nothing in canon.

Like I said the novels states ROTJ is Vader at his most powerful he's ever been in George lucas canon, like I said George Lucas statements on Vader means nothing in Disney era Star wars.

Let me Spell it out for you again, G..E..O..R..G..E L..U..C..A.S S..T..A..T..E..M..E..N..T..S M..E.A..N..S N..O..T..H..I..N..G I..N C..A..N..O..N

How many times do we need to tell you people this for you to understand George Lucas sold his power and rights to Star wars for 4.2 billion which is why he is crying about it now how upset he is about because he can't do anything or has any say so in star wars.

No Caption Provided

stated by people in Disney canon with power that a Fight Between Vader and Sidious can go either way.

ROTSSidious<<<<With Means Vader=<ROTJ Sidious

No Caption Provided

Dave Fillioni statements about Ahsoka against Vader:

No Caption Provided

Ahsoka is in Dooku tier as well as Maul, No way is ROTS Sidious is defeating two Dooku Tier fighters no matter how much you want to wank him, But Vader can.

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"G..E..O..R..G..E L..U..C..A.S S..T..A..T..E..M..E..N..T..S M..E.A..N..S N..O..T..H..I..N..G I..N C..A..N..O..N" They do mean something like it or not, he created the films with this in mind Anakin > Vader.

"stated by people in Disney canon with power that a Fight Between Vader and Sidious can go either way." All I see is Matt Martin saying that he personally thinks Sidious would defeat Vader.

"Ahsoka is in Dooku tier" Why because she barely held her own against Vader?

Avatar image for finalkingthanos
FinalKingThanos

6271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

In new canon the dark lords of the sith should take the majority in a good battle each time they are the two most powerful force users in canon since the disney take over, Yoda and Luke come closest.

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"G..E..O..R..G..E L..U..C..A.S S..T..A..T..E..M..E..N..T..S M..E.A..N..S N..O..T..H..I..N..G I..N C..A..N..O..N" They do mean something like it or not, he created the films with this in mind Anakin > Vader.

"stated by people in Disney canon with power that a Fight Between Vader and Sidious can go either way." All I see is Matt Martin saying that he personally thinks Sidious would defeat Vader.

"Ahsoka is in Dooku tier" Why because she barely held her own against Vader?

The Films doesn't state Anakin was more powerful than Vader. Like I said post the statements from the movie where it states this.

If we solely use the films even inquisitors by feats are more powerful than Yoda and Sidious.

No Caption Provided

Was able to lift and Entire Temple with the force, Yoda in the move struggled to life debris that Dooku sent at Anakin and Obi-wan.

So your argument is poor here. like I said Vader in canon is more powerful than Yoda, statements put him around equal to ROTJ Sidious, who Yoda is way weaker than.

Sidious stating that Vader was the Apprentice he wanted, and is easily super to Dooku.

No Caption Provided

Ahsoka not on Dooku tier? Try again buddy, she was able to hold off a Sidious 14 years after ROTS.

So, this Sidious is much much more powerful than the Sidious that Casually Choked Dooku.

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"If we solely use the films even inquisitors by feats are more powerful than Yoda and Sidious." We aren't solely using the films so I don't see how this is relevant? I said he created the films with Anakin being stronger than Vader in his mind I don't see how I'm making this film only.

"The Films doesn't state Anakin was more powerful than Vader. Like I said post the statements from the movie where it states this." Oh, now that makes sense for someone to tell Anakin randomly in the films that he's stronger than he will be as a mechanical Sith in 20+ years.

"So your argument is poor here. like I said Vader in canon is more powerful than Yoda, statements put him around equal to ROTJ Sidious, who Yoda is way weaker than." You've completely disregarded everything I said because it puts your favorite character below others. By your logic, ROTJ Luke is stronger than Yoda and all the other prequel top tiers.

"Yoda in the move struggled to life debris that Dooku sent at Anakin and Obi-wan." Vader struggled against ANH Obi-Wan and ESB Luke landed a blow on Vader.

"Ahsoka not on Dooku tier? Try again buddy, she was able to hold off a Sidious 14 years after ROTS." Ah, typical Dave Filoni making Ahsoka appear more powerful than she really is similar to her holding her own against Grievous and Ventress despite being 12 years old which I've seen is generally accepted as PIS.

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"If we solely use the films even inquisitors by feats are more powerful than Yoda and Sidious." We aren't solely using the films so I don't see how this is relevant? I said he created the films with Anakin being stronger than Vader in his mind I don't see how I'm making this film only.

"The Films doesn't state Anakin was more powerful than Vader. Like I said post the statements from the movie where it states this." Oh, now that makes sense for someone to tell Anakin randomly in the films that he's stronger than he will be as a mechanical Sith in 20+ years.

"So your argument is poor here. like I said Vader in canon is more powerful than Yoda, statements put him around equal to ROTJ Sidious, who Yoda is way weaker than." You've completely disregarded everything I said because it puts your favorite character below others. By your logic, ROTJ Luke is stronger than Yoda and all the other prequel top tiers.

"Yoda in the move struggled to life debris that Dooku sent at Anakin and Obi-wan." Vader struggled against ANH Obi-Wan and ESB Luke landed a blow on Vader.

"Ahsoka not on Dooku tier? Try again buddy, she was able to hold off a Sidious 14 years after ROTS." Ah, typical Dave Filoni making Ahsoka appear more powerful than she really is similar to her holding her own against Grievous and Ventress despite being 12 years old which I've seen is generally accepted as PIS.

"If we solely use the films even inquisitors by feats are more powerful than Yoda and Sidious." We aren't solely using the films so I don't see how this is relevant? I said he created the films with Anakin being stronger than Vader in his mind I don't see how I'm making this film only.

again, The films never said Vader was weaker than Anakin, we didn't know who was stronger until George Lucas statements which the novels contradicts because it states that ROTJ Vader is the strongest Vader and is his prime. even those this is irrelevant to this since we this holds no barrens on canon, but you clearly misunderstand GL, he even states After his injuries in ROTS Vader went from be more powerful than ROTS Sidious to 80% of him. Which mean he was still very much more powerful than Dooku who wasn't even that close to Sidious. It stated for 22 Years he gained power but whatever.

Like I said it irrelevant because Vader>>>Anakin.

"The Films doesn't state Anakin was more powerful than Vader. Like I said post the statements from the movie where it states this." Oh, now that makes sense for someone to tell Anakin randomly in the films that he's stronger than he will be as a mechanical Sith in 20+ years.

in Canon It didn't take Vader long to surpass Anakin at all, as a matter of fact Vader stated that the injuries strengthen his connection to the Dark side.

No Caption Provided

Right their his connection was much stronger in the force because of his injuries meaning Vader>Anakin.

"So your argument is poor here. like I said Vader in canon is more powerful than Yoda, statements put him around equal to ROTJ Sidious, who Yoda is way weaker than." You've completely disregarded everything I said because it puts your favorite character below others. By your logic, ROTJ Luke is stronger than Yoda and all the other prequel top tiers.

who was the one resorting to George Lucas and then started crying about his movies? You, are the one ignoring what being stated in canon and soely trying to use the film saying "oh, well GL had Vader being weaker than Anakin in his mind while Making the film" LMFAO, how do you even reply to such head canon? I don't care what you think he had in his mind, and in canon Vader is stated to be the strongest Sith 5 years after ROTS, you are the one who saying Vader will never be more powerful than Sidious when Even Snoke stated Vader is the most powerful sith. Are you going to say he doesn't know what he is talking about as well, because you don't like it?

Vader is my second favorite, Anakin is my favorite character in star wars.

"Yoda in the move struggled to life debris that Dooku sent at Anakin and Obi-wan." Vader struggled against ANH Obi-Wan and ESB Luke landed a blow on Vader.

According to your beloved GL Luke is as powerful as the plot demands him to be so i can say he more powerful than Obi-wan by ROTJ, Obi-wan one shotted Maul prior to ANH.

that was a Light saber duel anyway, Vader is a far better force wielder than he is a light saber duelist.

In canon, it stated Vader held back on Luke, and Obi-wan is more powerful then you are trying to downplay him to be and regardless Obi-wan was losing that battle and got killed.

"Ahsoka not on Dooku tier? Try again buddy, she was able to hold off a Sidious 14 years after ROTS." Ah, typical Dave Filoni making Ahsoka appear more powerful than she really is similar to her holding her own against Grievous and Ventress despite being 12 years old which I've seen is generally accepted as PIS.

Dave Filoni has full creative power over Rebels, and he said Rebels is Ahsoka's prime...and that she is the only one who is powerful to at least stand up to Vader and Sidious.

how you feel about it means nothing i only care about what the facts so be objective and stop using your own head canon; you have nothing that put Vader below Yoda, while i can drop many that puts Vader par with ROTJ Sidious while Yoda is weaker than ROTS Sidious.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for bayman007
Bayman007

4558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Team Jedi. Both Mace and Yoda can beat Sidious 1v1, same goes for Ani.

Avatar image for firelordiroh
firelordiroh

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Legends should go to the Jedi, Sith win in canon.

Avatar image for richard96
Richard96

6429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Team 2.

Avatar image for lord_tenebrous
Lord_Tenebrous

3788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Team 1 wins. Assuming that this is ROTJ Sidious, he's the MVP, but not to the degree that he can stomp either Jedi. One holds him off while the other one-shots Vader, then Sidious is double teamed and loses.

Avatar image for lord_tenebrous
Lord_Tenebrous

3788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dalootajr: @mygod000:

George Lucas' statements still hold weight in current canon. As Matt Martin himself confirmed, Disney views Lucas' intent as a guiding principle:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/FH3sb68VcPCT8EGg9

Not to mention, according to the Storygroup as a whole, the films are the highest canon in current continuity:

"While Lucasfilm always strived to keep the stories created for the EU consistent with our film and television content as well as internally consistent, Lucas always made it clear that he was not beholden to the EU. He set the films he created as the canon. This includes the six Star Wars episodes, and the many hours of content he developed and produced in Star Wars: The Clone Wars. These stories are the immovable objects of Star Wars history, the characters and events to which all other tales must align."

-- LucasFilm Storygroup

Disney quite plainly declared that the films are *immovable* objects, to which all other material must align. It's just not the DVD that's canon, it's what the movie entails. The story, information of the movie. And as creator of those movies, Lucas provides clear-cut insight into what the movies entail. By logic, his word on the films that he created, would be final. Even in Disney canon.

A major plot point of the films is that Vader's injuries on Mustafar severely nerfed him for the time being. That's what Lucas was explaining when he made the "from then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor" statement. So yes, it's top canon. Vader was never was strong as Sidious.

In current canon, Lucas has no authority on material that's not his. But he is a legitimate source on the movies and what they entail.

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@dalootajr: @mygod000:

George Lucas' statements still hold weight in current canon. As Matt Martin himself confirmed, Disney views Lucas' intent as a guiding principle:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/FH3sb68VcPCT8EGg9

Not to mention, according to the Storygroup as a whole, the films are the highest canon in current continuity:

"While Lucasfilm always strived to keep the stories created for the EU consistent with our film and television content as well as internally consistent, Lucas always made it clear that he was not beholden to the EU. He set the films he created as the canon. This includes the six Star Wars episodes, and the many hours of content he developed and produced in Star Wars: The Clone Wars. These stories are the immovable objects of Star Wars history, the characters and events to which all other tales must align."

-- LucasFilm Storygroup

Disney quite plainly declared that the films are *immovable* objects, to which all other material must align. It's just not the DVD that's canon, it's what the movie entails. The story, information of the movie. And as creator of those movies, Lucas provides clear-cut insight into what the movies entail. By logic, his word on the films that he created, would be final. Even in Disney canon.

A major plot point of the films is that Vader's injuries on Mustafar severely nerfed him for the time being. That's what Lucas was explaining when he made the "from then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor" statement. So yes, it's top canon. Vader was never was strong as Sidious.

In current canon, Lucas has no authority on material that's not his. But he is a legitimate source on the movies and what they entail.

The injuries didn't nerf him Sidious did. Vader stated his connection to the force became much stronger which mean he got much more powerful after his injuries. Sidious tried to nerf Vader so that it be harder for him to overthrow him.

Canon vader is more powerful than Anakin.

ROTJ Sidious>=Vader=>GM prime Luke>>ROTS Sidious>Yoda.

Avatar image for lord_tenebrous
Lord_Tenebrous

3788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"The injuries didn't nerf him Sidious did| Sidious tried to nerf Vader so that it be harder for him to overthrow him."

No, Sidious wanted Vader to become more powerful. He was angered when Vader screwed up and lost everything. That's why he wanted to throw away Vader when Luke came along, because Vader would always be fodder and Luke had his old potential: 

"And when he finds out Luke is his son, his first impulse is to figure out a way of getting him to join him to kill the Emperor. That's what Siths do! He tries it with anybody he thinks might be more powerful, which is what the Emperor was looking for in the first place: somebody who would be more powerful than he was and could help him rule the universe. But Obi-Wan screwed that up by cutting off his arms and legs and burning him up. From then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor -- he was like Darth Maul or Count Dooku. He wasn't what he was supposed to become. But the son could become that."

-- George Lucas 

Clear as day. That's why he brags about it to Yoda. 

"You will not stop me. Darth Vader will become more powerful than either of us!" 

-- Emperor Papatine(Revenge of the Sith)  

So yeah. 

"Vader stated his connection to the force became much stronger which mean he got much more powerful after his injuries."

Contradiction. Lucas disagrees with that: 

"Anakin, as Skywalker, as a human being, was going to be extremely powerful. But he ended up losing his legs and an arm and became partly a robot. So a lot of his ability to use the Force, a lot of his powers, are curbed at this point, because, as a living form, there’s not that much of him left. So his ability to be twice as good as the Emperor disappeared..."

-- George Lucas 

"He tries it with anybody he thinks might be more powerful, which is what the Emperor was looking for in the first place: somebody who would be more powerful than he was and could help him rule the universe. But Obi-Wan screwed that up by cutting off [Vader's] arms and legs and burning him up. From then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor -- he was like Darth Maul or Count Dooku. He wasn't what he was supposed to become." 

-- George Lucas  

So do other canon sources:  

"Sidious knew that Vader's broken body would make him weaker than before, but tested his apprentice's connection to the dark side by telling him that he had caused Padme's death. The intensity of Vader's anguish and self-hatred made it clear that he still possessed great power." 

-- StarWars.com: Biography Gallery 

"Canon vader is more powerful than Anakin." 

I agree, but not at first. He lost a lot of power and potential after his injuries, so it takes many years to grow more powerful than before.

"ROTJ Sidious>=Vader=>GM prime Luke>>ROTS Sidious>Yoda." 

ROTJ Sidious >> ROTS Yoda > ROTS Sidious >>>>>>>>>> Vader. We don't know where Luke is yet.

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"The injuries didn't nerf him Sidious did| Sidious tried to nerf Vader so that it be harder for him to overthrow him."

No, Sidious wanted Vader to become more powerful. He was angered when Vader screwed up and lost everything. That's why he wanted to throw away Vader when Luke came along, because Vader would always be fodder and Luke had his old potential:

"And when he finds out Luke is his son, his first impulse is to figure out a way of getting him to join him to kill the Emperor. That's what Siths do! He tries it with anybody he thinks might be more powerful, which is what the Emperor was looking for in the first place: somebody who would be more powerful than he was and could help him rule the universe. But Obi-Wan screwed that up by cutting off his arms and legs and burning him up. From then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor -- he was like Darth Maul or Count Dooku. He wasn't what he was supposed to become. But the son could become that."

-- George Lucas

Clear as day. That's why he brags about it to Yoda.

"You will not stop me. Darth Vader will become more powerful than either of us!"

-- Emperor Papatine(Revenge of the Sith)

So yeah.

"Vader stated his connection to the force became much stronger which mean he got much more powerful after his injuries."

Contradiction. Lucas disagrees with that:

"Anakin, as Skywalker, as a human being, was going to be extremely powerful. But he ended up losing his legs and an arm and became partly a robot. So a lot of his ability to use the Force, a lot of his powers, are curbed at this point, because, as a living form, there’s not that much of him left. So his ability to be twice as good as the Emperor disappeared..."

-- George Lucas

"He tries it with anybody he thinks might be more powerful, which is what the Emperor was looking for in the first place: somebody who would be more powerful than he was and could help him rule the universe. But Obi-Wan screwed that up by cutting off [Vader's] arms and legs and burning him up. From then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor -- he was like Darth Maul or Count Dooku. He wasn't what he was supposed to become."

-- George Lucas

So do other canon sources:

"Sidious knew that Vader's broken body would make him weaker than before, but tested his apprentice's connection to the dark side by telling him that he had caused Padme's death. The intensity of Vader's anguish and self-hatred made it clear that he still possessed great power."

-- StarWars.com: Biography Gallery

"Canon vader is more powerful than Anakin."

I agree, but not at first. He lost a lot of power and potential after his injuries, so it takes many years to grow more powerful than before.

"ROTJ Sidious>=Vader=>GM prime Luke>>ROTS Sidious>Yoda."

ROTJ Sidious >> ROTS Yoda > ROTS Sidious >>>>>>>>>> Vader. We don't know where Luke is yet.

again GL has no say so in canon. his movies maybe the highest of canon, but that is it. If we go based off the movies than even the Grand inquisitor is above ROTS Sidious.

Statements put VAder above ROTS Sidious he is stated to be the greatest threat to the Jedi .

Avatar image for alextheboss
AlexTheBoss

21672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yoda and the Emperor were really close during ROTS, but Palpatine most likely got stronger by ROTJ, so I would probably side with him. When it comes to the force, Mace is a weak link here, and I think Vader could beat him, and prime canon Vader could arguably beat Yoda as well, so overall the sith should take this.

Avatar image for lord_tenebrous
Lord_Tenebrous

3788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

"again GL has no say so in canon. his movies maybe the highest of canon, but that is it. If we go based off the movies than even the Grand inquisitor is above ROTS Sidious." 

As I said before: 

George Lucas' statements still hold weight in current canon. As Matt Martin himself confirmed, Disney views Lucas' intent as a guiding principle:

https://photos.app.goo.gl/FH3sb68VcPCT8EGg9

Not to mention, according to the Storygroup as a whole, the films are the highest canon in current continuity:

"While Lucasfilm always strived to keep the stories created for the EU consistent with our film and television content as well as internally consistent, Lucas always made it clear that he was not beholden to the EU. He set the films he created as the canon. This includes the six Star Wars episodes, and the many hours of content he developed and produced in Star Wars: The Clone Wars. These stories are the immovable objects of Star Wars history, the characters and events to which all other tales must align."

-- LucasFilm Storygroup

Disney quite plainly declared that the films are *immovable* objects, to which all other material must align. It's just not the DVD that's canon, it's what the movie entails. The story, information of the movie. And as creator of those movies, Lucas provides clear-cut insight into what the movies entail. By logic, his word on the films that he created, would be final. Even in Disney canon. Especially when talking about information pertaining to the film. 

A major plot point of the films is that Vader's injuries on Mustafar severely nerfed him for the time being. That's what Lucas was explaining when he made the "from then on, he wasn't as strong as the Emperor" statement. So yes, it's top canon. Vader was never was strong as Sidious.

In current canon, Lucas has no authority on material that's not his. But he is a legitimate source on the movies and what they entail. 

"Statements put VAder above ROTS Sidious he is stated to be the greatest threat to the Jedi ." 

Again, random supremacy quotes that I addressed in the other thread. Plus, his movie feats show otherwise. Struggling against IG-102 and Obi-Wan show that he's much closer to the average Council member than Sidious.

Avatar image for yousufkhan1212
YousufKhan1212

2507

Forum Posts

66

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Team 1 destroys Team 2 because Vader is a severe weak link.

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000: Sorry for being rude and uncivil in our debate.

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000: Sorry for being rude and uncivil in our debate.

You don't need to apologize, we are just two passionate individuals debating here. at the end of the day, it's all is the spirit of good debate, and i have no hard feelings towards you on your picks. I just think we are all not looking fully at the facts.

I'll say it again, i agree that ROTJ Sidious is more powerful than Vader I won't dispute that, but I do think he is very close to That Sidious in powers. I think we both can agree that Yoda put up a good fight

Avatar image for dalootajr
dalootajr

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@mygod000:

Agreed., the Jedi have a shot at winning if it was ROTS Palpatine and Vader but not ROTJ.

Avatar image for mygod000
MyGod000

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By MyGod000

@dalootajr said:

@mygod000:

Agreed., the Jedi have a shot at winning if it was ROTS Palpatine and Vader but not ROTJ.

Okay. Another thing Even if it ROTJ Sidious, I don't See anyone just completely Ragdolling Yoda, Like Sidious at the end of his fight did to Maul.

I do want to note again, Vader at his best in the suit is a good deal more powerful than ROTS Sidious, upward to about 18-20%, and I see ROTJ Sidious about 21% stronger than his ROTS Sidious. just to be clear, I don't even think a DE Sidious could Ragdoll Yoda.

As for ROTS Sidious, I have about about 1% more powerful than Yoda in Canon. as for their Dueling skill i'll say they are all about equals.

In canon Vader is implied to be better than Sidious with a light saber but not by much, so this is how I see them in light saber skills Vader>=Yoda>Sidious>=Mace.

So, Yes the Jedi have a shot at beating them. I just want to post this an make this clear those:

No Caption Provided

in rebels Ahsoka is in the top 3-4 jedi of all time in fighting. this means she is comparable in skill with Jedi masters like Yoda, Mace, and Dooku. Vader was able to overwhelm her pretty easily with minor difficulty. as a matter of fact, if she is 3rd best that would put her above Dooku in terms of skill with a light saber who is stated to be comparable in skill to Yoda.

so, in terms of light saber skills this fight is pretty near even, it starts to become more clear when you add force powers into it and it becomes much more in favor of the sith Winning this.