Who is most durable: MCU Thor or Arrowverse Supergirl or DCEU Superman

Not just that, he also survived floating around in vacuum for possibly hours (so the coldest anything could be) without air too.

People also downball Supergirl because she said to mxyzptlk she will die in this 400 megatons of force explosion, ok. BUT SHE STATED SO ! She as other heroes are often wrong.

This thread is more civil than I thought.

Thor wins tanking a neutron star is better than anything Supergirl or superman has ever done

@deactivated-5bd0d99b6c6f7: You are clearly a fanboy. you can't use theories and your imagination to put clark at that level. Give me a statement at the very least

Pffff who the f*ck thinks Thor is more durable than Kara. Thor barely died and Kara was even unharmed. Kara all the way. And lool at explosion which even Cyborg resisted. Pathethic. Kara all the way

How the hell is Thor any facor here? How is he even a CANDIDATE?

Guy is hit with a boulder that he BLOCKED, and he can't get up after that and is all bleeding and bruised? Are you kidding? How is he comparing to kryptonians exactly again? His blunt force durability is GARBAGE.

He gets stabbed THROUGH armor with a tiny little two inch needle and he's not just bleeding but on his knees and all? PLEASE. His piercing durability is just as trashy as his blunt force one.

If anything, maybe Thor is at least immune to nerve paralysis and that kinda technology right? NOPE. All you need is a random alien zapper from some trash planet to one-shot KO a god of thunder. That's just sad. tbh, it's pathetic too.

Any telepathy resistance maybe...? No...? Not even that? I mean damn. Next you'll tell me this guy can be hurt and swiped off his feet by getting hit with a volleyball.

OH COME ON.

Lierally the ONLY kind of durability that Thor has that is impressive is his energy durability from his star feat and power stone feat. I can give him that, but that does make up for his complete lack of durability in all other aspects? No. And even those energy feats are just... ya know... not as impressive as people try to make them to be honestly. I mean power stone in avengers IW was NERFED a LOT. Tony was able to tank a full blast with a shield made of titanium for crying outloud. It's certainly not the same stone which Ronan used to bust an entire star fleet in one shot. As for the star... well there's no telling at all how how was the stream that hit him to begin with. The star was a tiny-ass dwarf and didn't seem to have any overwhelming gravity too, so it's not like it was a super-dense star or anything. And even if the stream was super-hot, the fact is Thor would DIE if Stormbreaker didn't heal him. In other words, he didn't tank the star at all. All he did was survive long enough for the axe to save his ass.

Still Thor

@gateofbabylon: Personally I consider his best durability feat resisting the terraforming beam in MOS while weakened. It was basically a gravity weapon hitting him constantly and he still managed to overcome it and fly through an alien ship in order to stop it.

Supergirl obviously.

I really don’t think that Thor or Kara’s feats are consistent.

Supergirl > Superman > Thor

This i must admit. They are as strong as plot need to be. At best Thor extremely barely survived this star ( as sb calculated power of 12 tsar bombs ). Kara survived this explosion which seemingly looks like covering half of planet or as Kurtis said nuclear power to obliterate entire Mid-West, traveling through time warpholes and Reign full powered strikes ( literally low planet lvl buster ). But still writes don't keep their consistence

Kara causally laughed off a country level explosion. The other two are out of their element

Are you calling Superman a Tony Stark level character?

Superman consistently between him and Thor.

Cannot speak of Supergirl

This.

Kara>Thor>Supes

CW Supergirl is leagues ahead the competition. Anyone saying otherwise is flat-out in denial. DCEU Superman comes in second, and Thor in dead last.

The issue isn't that Thor doesn't have good high-end feats, it's that he has so many low-end ones. And they're not even subtle, either, they're glaring. Granted, Supergirl isn't terribly consistent either (which is something Superman has on them both), but MCU Thor's durability strikes me as more of an in-between, like greater than Wonder Woman, but lesser than Superman

Thor has the best feats. Period.

Consistent feats:

1) Blunt force durability:

1. Clark.
2. Thor.
3. Kara.

2) Energy durability:

1. Thor/Superman.
2. Kara.

High end/outliers:

1) Blunt force:

1. Kara.
2. The rest.

2) Energy:

1. Kara.
2. The rest.

This.

Or this.

Is better than anything I've seen from Kara or Thor. Keep in mind he's weakened in both scenarios. DCEU Superman has never jobbed. He's only ever been hurt by equally powerful beings or while weakened. Can't say the same for Kara and Thor.

Thors feat might as well have been a random ball who gives out some light and heat.

If the movie is going to make the claim that it is a neutron star then at least try to replicate the properties of one. I just cant take it seriously when it does not look like one nor behave like one.
For me its just no way to know what kind of force/energy Thor was taking from this ball.
If someone on the screen says "that was a good burger!" But you can clearly see they are eating a pancake. Which one is it.

@essem: Wrong. The rings and containment sphere are designed to counter act the stars gravity and magnetic pull to allow the dwarves to harness it's power.

Very straightforward actually.

Neutron Star feat is 100% legit. Just deal with it and move on.

@ipvman:

Sokovia explosion>>>>>BvS Nuke.

Neutron Star>>>>>>World engine.

@chazzer: Sokovia was a crumbling piece of rock that Iron Man also tanked. The nuke is much more impressive. The forge feat is an unquantifiable heat resistance feat since we don't know the melting temperature of Uru. Again not nearly as impressive as taking the gravity of Krypton.

And you seem to forget he's weakened in both scenarios. So that's below his normal power level.

@ipvman: Still incorrect.

Lois: if that thing is making earth like krypton, won't you be weaker around it?

Clark: MAYBE, I'm not gonna let that stop me from trying.

@chazzer: You're reaching. We're shown multiple times Krypton's atmosphere makes him weaker (like on the Kryptonian ship when they capture him). And he's shown coughing around the world engine due to the atmosphere. It's made pretty clear.

How Kara is consistently weakest ? At begginings she was adapting more to Earth atmosphere and was getting stronger. Livewire absorbed electricity from entire city and Kara was taking her strikes lool. Kara normally could even resist time travel. Ok only outlier can be via PIS taking strikes from S3 finale Reign but Kara never was really hurt ( but stunned or flinched ) besides Reign strikes and sb with kryptonite. And please don't tell me Thor is consistently durable because he has many low end showings.

@ipvman: What? In the ship he was completely depowered by the internal atmosphere.

The machine was sending out a gravity beam. He coughed from the thick black smoke which was nowhere near Clark when he was under the beam.

I think you're the one who is reaching and searching for excuses.

Very bad look.

@chazzer: The beam was terraforming the Earth to be like Krypton. Similar to how Kryptonite works, if you inhale a huge puff of something specifically meant to weaken you you're not going to be fine moments later lol. I mean use some common sense here. I really don't know why you're disputing that point because it's very clearly stated and backed up with visual evidence. Not much to argue with.

@ipvman: the thing is by claiming he was weakened will invite questions on how much was he weakened? 1%, 5%, ten, fifty?

We don't know and never will know.

The feat is already impressive on it's own, saying he did it while weakened, yet not knowing by how much doesn't add anything to the feat.

@chazzer: That's an important piece of context. Even if we don't know for sure how much he was weakened, we know he was weakened to a certain extent. So his normal power levels are certainly greater.

@undefined: all of those are not durability feats but heat resistance feats

@ipvman: even if we don't know the melting point of uru, it still makes a good energy durability feat. If you want to say it melts at the melting point of steel then I can't help you.

Uru tanked surtur fire that can be more than enough to melt steel.

Damn that's some fine Thor lowball up there.

Kara stomps.

Superman.

StAr LeVeL tHoR!!

Yeah, this sounds accurate enough

i disagree

@sexybayonetta22: Let me guess, Superman should be number one regardless of the opposition?

@ourmanuel: Lmao

It makes it an unquantifiable energy durability feat. The only energy Thor took was the heat to melt the Uru to make stormbreaker. There were no other forces at play, unlike Superman who we see take all the properties of a nuke, the impact, heat, and radiation. I'm sure Uru does have a much higher melting point than steel but until someone can prove that it's still an unquantifiable heat resistance feat. The world engine and nuke while weakened is far more impressive. I don't know much about Kara but I've definitely not seen anything or this thread comparing her to Clark either.