Who is more durable in the MCU: Thor or Hulk

Hulk.

Hulk by feats actually.

Knocking down Fenris (who has invulnerability) under water while it bites you >>>>>>>> getting stabbed by a puny god.

Thor

Obviously Hulk lol. People who say Thor are just trolling, obviously.

Thor ducked from a minigun in Avengers and Hulk just ignored the bullets. Kurse literally mopped the floor with Thor and made him bleed by throwing a 100 ton boulder on him. Hulk was punched by Veronica for 5 minutes straight and had 1000s of tons worth of building fall on him and he didn't as much as nose bleed. Loki stabbed Thor THROUGH ARMOR with a tiny pocket knife and he got one shot by an alien taser in his god form. Thor has pretty much fodde durability when compared to Hulk. He can probably be killed by high caliber bullets tbh.

Trolling or just ignorant?

Lmao, yes, the guy that took quinjet fire and was only knocked down with no injuries, can be killed by high caliber bullets.

The sokovia feat is not an energy feat for Thor he literally used is own lightning why would that harm him the blast was all concussive force

@erkan12: fenris does not invulnerability and Lokis knife was obviously not mundane. Thor got KOd by Hulkbuster....Sokovia feat >>>>> Hulkbuster/cement building feat.

FTFY.

And yes, I'm not sure if @erkan12 is trolling. You literally just showed us a gif of Hulk being pierced. What does knocking Fenrir out have anything to do with durability?

and Loki's dagger is Asgardian and most likely magical. Why do people act like Thor got pierced by a 2 dollar pen knife bought from a stationary store?

I don't get your reasoning; if you detonate a bomb of your own making you'd still need the required durability to tank it.

With those last 3 lines, he's just almost certainly a troll or a blind Hulk fanboy.

@marvelanddcfan24:

Actually Thor can be knocked out by his own blast. He got knocked out when he hit Mjolnir against Malekith and it caused a small burst of his own energy.

You're mistaken durability with invulnerability. Lol. I need to educate you on this.

Durability ; the ability to withstand wear, pressure, or damage.

Invulnerability ; the power to be immune to any kind of damage.

Hulk withstands Fenris's bite, he didn't tank it. He withstands it because he knock it down with a punch after getting the damage. Which is durability. Thor withstands Loki's stab and then he threw him. Which is why people are using that Loki's stab as a feat here. Which is laughable when you compare Fenris with Loki's little stab.

If you want to compare the invulnerability of the two, Hulk still wins;

@jayc1324:

Quit spazzing mate.

The same knife that stabbed Thor would of stabbed Hulk, fact. Hulk got pierced quite easily by Fen, so pretty sure Asgardian metal would do the exact same.

Kurse >>>>>>> Hulkbuster

Thor rolled out the way because just because someone can tank something doesn't mean they WANT to, Hulk is a mindless brute who wouldn't think to move out the way, Thor is smarter as evidenced when they fought in the arena.

@sophisticated_ignorance:

Hulk isn’t a mindless brute. Back in incredible Hulk was was innovative enough to use a police car as a boxing glove, in Avengers AoU he had the mental capacity to understand how much damage he caused while under Scarlet Witch influence, in Avengers he was able to listen to commands and follow them, he understood he needed to catch Tony to survive, he’s blocked grenade launchers with pieces of metal around and now he can speak. He even understood to cover both Black Widow and Betty Ross from incoming fire using his own body because he UNDERSTOOD he can take the damage while they couldn’t.

All of what you said are excuses. There’s no real reason to believe Thor can take that type of fire without armor on and there’s no reason to believe Hulk would be pierced by Asgardian weaponry.

Yup. And the most impressive thing is, he was able to understand how stop an explosion before he can physically reach there, he understood that he couldn't reach there so he invented the thunderclap to stop an explosion in time.

Hulk isn't stupid when it comes to fighting, Banner and Hulk are two sides of the same coin, one of them has no talent in fighting, but extremely intelligent, and the other one is talented when it comes to fighting and he is fearless but stupid when it comes to irrelevant things to fight.

I don't want people to be misinformed with his nonsense lol

After Infinity War Thor obviously has the superior feats. But they are clearly close to each other.

Thor, obviously.

Thor stomps. He had way better durability feats even in his first movie.

Thor was always more durable than Hulk. The things that knocked out Hulk couldn't knock out Thor.

Thor, given that *cough* *cough* Neutron Star feat.

Thor has always been more durable at every stage in the MCU. Even in his first film he was no selling massive explosions that dwarfed buildings and sent out shockwaves larger than a town.

but he was stabbed by a small knife waaaaah

Hulk takes blunt force better than Thor

Tell me guys, do you think Hulk can be knocked out with a single Thanos Headbutt? The Answer is No. They are close in durability but Hulk is more durable

@aris_action: Thor had taken more than that prior. The damage adds up since he doesn't have passive regen.

Blunt force - Hulk

Piercing - Hulk

Energy - Hulk

Hulk has been consistently Thors physical superior from Avengers 1 to Avengers EG Thor only has the raw lightning power and gear over him.

That's true, Damage added up but Thor had a long stretch of time after his near death when he fought basically fodder. That's enough time to recover somewhat. Hulk in the exact position will likely fall down from Thanos' headbutt but not be KOed.

The fact that Pre-Awakened Thor could not put Hulk down with H2H and even weapons when he started fighting seriously despite his insane fighting skills compared to Hulk pretty much proves Hulk's superior physicality

Pre-Awakened could do it with weapons. He just never closed in on Hulk when he knocked him through the stadium wall, and he was obviously holding back for the majority of that time.

Also peak Thanos was EG Thanos according to Russos.

@aris_action:

I'm surprised at the amount of people choosing Thor in this thread tbh lol you would have to totally ignore every film they appear in and just make up your own headcanon for Thor to be more durable.

@finalkingthanos: I totally agree. I think Thor's power-up in Ragnarok is what makes people believe he exceeds Hulk. In MCU, Hulk has always been more physically imposing while Thor has always been more powerful. In IW, Thor got Stormbreaker, he was still physically inferior to Hulk but clearly even more powerful than Hulk. I was actually shocked Thor could contest with Thanos in strength to the degree he did. That's why I think Thor is strongest in EndGame. Well, that's besides the point though

Before Endgame I would have said Thor but after Hulk is more durable.

They are mostly the same, Hulk just has a size advantage.

Thor

By univers logic Hulk