@empressofdread: yes I have.
Compelling argument indeed.
no scan is out of context, You are lying now. The scan is 100% in context.
The scan never mentions the specific punch yet you use it as evidence for said specific punch, out of context.
Since you are ignoring basic facts yes. I have to show the scan again.
Basic facts of scans talking about something else entirely?
Nope. you are becoming less credible though.
Between the 2 of us only i am the one saying both of us are speculating, while you are saying you are absolutely right on something you can't even show actual proof of but your interpenetration of. So no.
The fact that Superman did not want to kill shown in the scan.
He did want to kill he stated as much, he just wanted him to suffer as well.
As he is saying he wants him to suffer first and not outright kill him.
Which is why he took him all the way to the Sun to try and throw him there, you are trying to justify actions of a bloodlusted, mind-controlled character, who is seething with rage and beyond rational thought.
No. It is on the same panel he is talking in that instant.
That's a recap of what happened, it does not mean he was talking about that specific punch, since he does not reference that specific punch.
You think you debunked it. But no such thing happened for real.
If you think so then you don't understand the difference between intent and consequences.
That whether Supermans punch was a "I want to kill you" blunt force in the moment.
You want to CAV that? Are you high? How do we even CAV that, you honestly sound like some rando on the internet screaming into the mike "fight me IRL bro" when he doesn't know what else to say, also how many times do i have to repeat to you that i don't do CAV's for it to finally to sink into your head?
And obviously this- the fact about damaging people just to stop holding back but not trying to have the intention to kill.
This is intent vs consequences, Supermans intention was not to kill someone but when you deliver non-holding back blows you run the risk of killing someone just as much as when you intend to kill someone.
The scan is the proof you ignore. Anyway, I can CAV this argument, You can try to prove your this was a kill shot and intent vs consequences, I'll take care of proving that scan as a legit evidence that you ignore. We'll see whos argument holds up better?
I haven't ignored it, i mentioned the scan half a dozen times already and why it's not the proof you think it is. There are no CAVs on arguments, how old are you?
Every punch Superman hit was a non-holding back punch - FACT.
Every non-holding back punch is the strongest punch you can do, as in be a killer blow - FACT.
It is against the rules but i can show you in PM videos of people playing the knockout game punching random people with the intent to knock them out with 1 punch and accidentally killing them without wanting to kill them, the fact that we need to argue such ridiculous semantics even going for a CAV which would be the dumbest CAV this site has ever seen is really astounding.
I wonder how long i can keep you going.
Snape kills Dumbledore