Vlad Tepes (Real Life) vs King Arthur (Real Life)

Setting/Location: Romania

Victory Conditions: Death of the opposing character

Motivation: IC

Circumstance: Vlad tepes tries to kill arthur so he could take over his kingdom

Equipment: Standard combat gear for both

Preparation: N/A

Continuity/Canon: Real Life

Distance: 20 ft

King Arthur as in the fictional Saxon King?

Vlad obviously

Vlad because he actually existed

Well since we are using their real life counterparts Vlad wins by his existence being verifiable.

Did the OP not know King Arthur probably didn't exist?

If we’re using the random Saxon King Arthur would be equated to, Vlad wins.

If we use the King Arthur from the myths, he stomps

Vlad is overrated. Gjerj Kastrioti (Skanderbeg) killed far more turks, fought them hand 2 hand in gladiator pits, had a cooler helmet, and was probably the most successful general of all time in the tactic of ambushing, hit and run, and raiding supply chains.

@six-deuce: Still I'd probably bet on Vlad against a random Saxon King with above average leadership capabilities.

@mee09: I wouldn’t even think such a thing is quantifiable. Vlad wins by nature of the fact that he existed. I mentioned Skanderbeg simply because he gets no love despite being big-daddy Slav