@cpt_nice said:
@theonetaichou: First off, mate, bombarda maxima is a film only spell, so technically non-cannon. Secondly, that is literally one of the best destructive spells as of yet in the HP verse, and it barely blew up one wall. Galadriels took down the huge fortress walls of Dol Guldur by herself, so her destructive capability should be significantly above that.
There is no way to know whether Accio will even work on the magical items top tiers in the LOTR universe have. Accio is also not something that will literally rip objects out of people's hands. If that were the case, everyone would use it all the time to disarm the other person, but that is not the case.
Win. Leviosa does not work on human beings. Clearly stated in the books.
Transfiguration spells are rarely, if ever, used in combat and we can thus conclude they are either extremely hard to use effectively or are not IC for people to use
So, knowledge of the HP verse? Yeah, not really. Maybe read the books instead.
...sorry I missed the part that said Book Feats only by the OP?
Doesn't say, but contrary to for example WL, Bombarda Maxima is just non-cannon. I would say that is a clear indication for not using it. But OP @lastnickleft can specify if they'd like maybe?
As for Galadriel's feat - I don't deny it, I merely doubt whether it can get through a magical shield - which can be enforced as well, or why can't the HP team let loose spells in her direction or the many ways they can stop her.
At the very least Gandalf, and by definition Saruman as he is more powerful and also a wiz, can also throw down shields of their own, which stop physical objects (Balrog weapon) as well as protect them from magic. Harry is never seen using an effective shield, Moody and Snape neither iirc. That leaves Voldie and Dumbledore, who have pretty good shields but those only stop spells iirc. What is stopping Galadriel from blowing their asses sky high? Or Thranduil from shooting them?
I don't doubt the power of LOTR - I just don't see what their power can do when it's slow, nebulous against insta-spells of HP.
As someone already stated, spells are often dodged by teenage students with normal human speed and no combat skills. They are not as fast as you make it out to be.
Maybe you can tell me how her feat will render HP unable to attack nor counter nor attack her in the process?
It won't. But what is stopping her from going 'loltornado' right off the bat and bfr'ing anyone besides Voldie and Dumbledore, who I realistically see as the only ones being able to doing something against that?
How do you know accio will not work?
Show me an instance of someone using Accio as an disarm spell. In fact, if you can just accio someone's weapon, then why is there a specific disarm spell
This battle takes place in a shared universe where both magics are applicable (part of the Battle Forum Rules). You are just special pleading now for the LOTR.
No, you just lack a basic understanding of how the spells in HP work and give possible battle scenario's that are not supported by feats OR logic. I could say 'Gandalf burns their wands as he did with Aragorn's sword', but I do not have proof of that working. I am not special pleading, you are making up stuff.
The spell will work, and worse Hermione used accio to call Dark Arts books from Dumbledore's office without knowing where the books are.
Accio has been shown to get stationary objects within a certain range if the user can focus on the item. It has never been used to get someone's weapons from someone elses grip. It really is not rocket science.
You have no point why accio will not work. As for ripping items out of peoples hands... how do you know? There is no way to know either way but at least I have the precedence of objects being summoned as a point.
You have no showing of Accio getting a weapon out of person's hand. Burden of proof is on you to prove it will work, not on me proving something WON'T happen that has not been shown in any of the HP books. That is not how debating works.
Accio gets you an object you concentrate on within a certain range. This object has never been held down by anyone, nor was it in motion. It is not on me to prove that it won't happen if it has never been shown to happen. Debating rules 1,01
oh by the way Harry used it famously in the Tri-Wizards Cup to summon his broom - a magical item.
Again a stationary object not held down by a person. Yawn.
Wingardium leviosa - pray tell where does it states that in the books?
I do not know the exact page, but I know it is there. Why don't you find an example of someone using it to make a person float?
It's poppycock to equate rare usage with difficulty... there is no link there.
Feat for someone using transfiguration in a fight?
Again special pleading for the LOTR team. They get transfigured unless you have points to show why they don't.
Same reasoning as the Accio argument, burden is on you.
So... again HP wins. Combat effective magic.
A good argument can be made for HP team, but I still think LOTR takes it.
Log in to comment