The New Sentry Vs. post crisis Superman

who wins ???

Merged Sentry stomps

Superman effortlessly. Because Sentry is yet to tank a star lvl feat, he’s constantly getting destroyed by the sun.

@Shadow411: Funny guy.

Sentry handily.

Merged Sentry was getting hurt by Fat Cobra and had a really shaky run of feats, so Superman.

He wasn't hurt.
Fat Cobra helped him balancing his Chi by removing a bit of his Negative Energy...

@theanimal666: Having your position imbalanced by a regular dude who manipulates Chi seems pretty bad pimp, Sentry kinda struggled with that team when they had to fight him

Him taking hits from AF Thor with ease >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Dude, he was in a sort of trance and wasn't aware about his surroundings and stuff...
Sentry wasn't even trying to really fight them...
His thought were just... Elsewhere...

Did you really read the story ?

@theanimal666: Being "in a sort of trance" doesn't make his durability any lower pimp

He wasn't damaged...

He was hurt pimp

No, he wasn't...

The New Sentry is featless

He was

Go on, show me the damages...

Merged sentry should take this

Show me he wasn't hurt at all

It's your claim that he was damaged, show me the damages.

I need to see what this Sentry can do. Can anyone provide feats for this version of Sentry?

It's your counter that he wasn't, show me he wasn't considering you started the argument and made the first claim

That's not how it works, dude.
I don't have to prove something that never happened.

Show the damages.

@theanimal666: You said he wasn't damaged as the first counter, so prove it, should be easy enough

Again, show me the damages.
I don't have to prove a negative.

Top notch debating ^.

Anyway, normal Sentry would beat Superman, any version above that one stomps.

@professorrespect:

I honestly dislike people in the world who argue like you, you claimed he was damaged. So the onus is on you to provide the burden of proof when challenged, the other poster shouldn’t have to provide proof to support your own counter claim.

Yeah, this is boring, really.
He is not posting the scans because:
1) He didn't read it.
OR
2)He knows that Sentry wasn't damaged.

Exactly.

Or you didn't provide proof in your counter, which could be easily done considering you started the argument and yet haven't proven anything outside of just saying he wasn't hurt pimp

1. I don't even know who you are

2. You haven't posted since last October yet you quickly respond here while I'm talking to some other dude and you have a pretty low post count, your only follower is the other guy I'm debating with, seems pretty suspect to me tbh

Lmao

Superman stomps

the same fat cobra wastaking hits that were compared to "neutron" bomb

This sentry has some good feats i think he stomped the avengers, waas suposed to be above Sentry and void and stuff...don´t know

Dude, you claimed that he was damaged.
You made that claim, then I answered to you that he wasn't.
Prove your claim.

@theanimal666: Prove my claim is invalid by submitting evidence he wasn't hurt by your first reply

Dude, you must really sucks at fishing.

You can't even fulfil a simple burden of proof. Concession accepted.

Clark mollywhoppes based off of feats.

That's not a grammatically correct sentence.

@professorrespect: That's not even kindergarten-level debating... That's so low...

Dude, you aren't even capable to honour a basic burden of proof.

"Give feats to disprove my claim you responded to in the first place"

"no u"

top tier debating, respond with another non argument to make your point clear

@professorrespect: No.
Give feats to prove your claims.
Yeah, top tier debating dude. <3

@theanimal666: Give feats to disprove my claim or respond with another non argument

How does Superman lose exactly?

That's not how it works.
I know you aren't trolling.
You are just ignorant. :/
That's sad.

It is considering you responded to my claim with no feats

Give feats

Not hard

......wow......

@professorrespect: Your claim was about the durability.
Go on. Show the damages.

@theanimal666: Give feats to prove your initial claim made, rather than go "no u" again

@professorrespect:

burden of proof

You said that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim, but with someone else to disprove.

The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever. However it is important to note that we can never be certain of anything, and so we must assign value to any claim based on the available evidence, and to dismiss something on the basis that it hasn't been proven beyond all doubt is also fallacious reasoning.

Example: Bertrand declares that a teapot is, at this very moment, in orbit around the Sun between the Earth and Mars, and that because no one can prove him wrong, his claim is therefore a valid one.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The claim you've made is that he was damaged.

Prove it.

If you provide no evidence I will consider that you have no proof and thus that you concede.

I will ignore all your posts until you provide evidence.