@demongod_pablo: PIS plot induced stupidity, it doesn't necessarily need to be a feat. It could be a character making a stupid mistake which is for plot reason. Anti-feats are the opposite of feats, which are instances showing characters at a much lower power level than standard feats. According to my understanding.
@thebestofthebest: ohh I was thinking that the first scans with Drax were right after the cancerverse. When thanos fought the the GOTG On earth he was weakened though
@mr_shazam0920: While being slower than rain Goku almost failed to react to the ground moving underneath him when it falls due to gravity, next he says its a close shave if you read the panel. It is also very obvious.
@empressofdread: How is energy not headed in the direction of a surface gonna hit that surface ? It decreeses with distance just because the ratio of the surface area of the explosion and the target changes. Energy density (joule/m^2) if only dependant on the distance while total energy taken (joules) is dependant on surface area ratio.
Yes star that goes supernova. Heat only because it wont cause nearly as much force and pressure as a punch with the same energy behind it.
My bad. I meant energy intensity. English isn’t my main.
if only dependant on the distance while total energy taken (joules) is dependant on surface area ratio.
It is inversely dependent on distance, it does decrease with distance and your facts were wrong about energy density.
Yes star that goes supernova.
Quote me, brother, I didn't ask you to confirm that. But yes certain stars do go supernova, let me quote you.
"Star of the supernova"
What do you mean?
Heat only because it wont cause nearly as much force and pressure as a punch with the same energy behind it.
Not heat but energy, but I guess you are partially right about one thing, characters should have separate blunt force durability feats.
Energy intensity (i think this is the right word (?)) of a supernova of average size at 95 million miles is 3,4 x 10^21 joules/m^2. Total energy taken by an object = intensity x surface area.
You never proved its relevance, I asked you how it's relevant and you are asking me how is it not? Do you realise the problem with this argument?
You have heard of it but you might not be getting the logic behind it.
You are assuming it, also you have nothing in evidence. To support it.
As in area of the explosion/area of the target.
Area of the explosion is vague, it can change. Supernova ejects bulk of the stellar mass at extremely high relativistic speeds (at least in scientific theory) driving also the shockwave of the explosion. It expands later. Even the expanding shockwave can heat the target at much higher temperatures than the highest melting point of anything on Earth. Theoretically in order much higher than millions of K.
So target changes nothing. Ratio changes.
And that changes what? The intensity changes with distance yes. Farther away things get bombarded with a lower intensity of the shockwave as the expelled material travels at decreased speeds.
My bad. I meant energy intensity. English isn’t my main.
That's ok. Now, I knew what you meant.
What do you mean?
IDK, you tell me, you were the one who said "Star of the supernova" I just wanted to know what did you mean?
Energy intensity (i think this is the right word (?)) of a supernova of average size at 95 million miles is 3,4 x 10^21 joules/m^2. Total energy taken by an object = intensity x surface area.
Sorry, but this evidence actually refutes your initial claim and corroborates my counter-argument. I have the colored image for this diagram and it actually proves that the further away from the Sun (not supernova btw) an object is the intensity of the radiation (not the expelled stellar material) affecting it will be reduced inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
So objects much closer to the Sun will experience a higher intensity of solar radiation.
@thebestofthebest: hulk survived a supernova though. I was exaggerating about iron man, although he is quite strong and with prep can manage to survive that like in avengers vs X-men.
But hulk survived a supernova at point blank range. I just used that link to show Superman fanboys that Superman isn’t as strong as hulk or sentry lol. Sorry??
@chosenone1222: But you posted a weaker Superman surviving a Supernova tho :/ - he still has better high-ends tho.
Edit:
But hulk survived a supernova at point blank range.
Is that from the classic era? I mean, Superman once survived and remained conscious after being crushed with a concentrated-force equivalent to a Nova, which is again a solar system busting force, a high-end feat given his consistent power levels but still quite impressive.
Log in to comment