@xlr87t3:
Perhaps to you, but to many others on this site it matters greatly. We can talk all day 'till the cows come home, but you will find that folks here will eventually want something more concrete.
That is fine, by fan calcs thanos still can't tank odin's output. Fan calc of odin's output >> fan calc of thanos's durability feat. Odin's output >> thanos's durability feat. Either way, he wouldn't survive.
2. That is still not true. The mass-energy of a collapsing black hole with an event horizon of at least 2 light-year radius is still more than that of the entire local group of galaxies.
1. For one, mass energy doesn't even enter the picture, only the calc said it was released, the comic doesn't agree.
2. The calc directly assumes the event horizon is at 2 light years, which is false as well.
3. Don't worry. I got just the galaxy busting calc for you.
Mass energy of a single star like sun = 5.4×10^47 J.
Radius of galaxy is 1.3*10^7 times that of the sun. Considering a galaxy buster spends energy at around the same intensity everywhere, presumably in a spherical distribution across that volume, amount of energy released = 5.4*10^47 J *(volume the energy is spread in/volume of sun)
= 5.4*10^47 J * (radius ratio)^3
=5.4*10^47J * 2.2*10^21
=11.88*10^68J
Thanos barely survived the energy of 1.145044631e60 joules as per the calc in post 138, while galaxy busting is 1042000000 times that. Thus, calcs conclusively prove that thanos cannot survive even a millionth of galaxy busting attack.
3. You can use an attack that can destroy a much larger area than 2 light years, but it doesn't mean it's more powerful than a black hole. Using your same logic, the more energy means the more powerful, and Thanos tanked that in full.
Getting back to reality, it does - that's the best the black hole has done, and the attack has done more.
Log in to comment