Fight begins in the Grand Canyon
Start 40 feet from each other
Current versions of each
Fight begins in the Grand Canyon
@TheCerealKillz: Supes wins Cereal........===
@TheCerealKillz: Supes wins Cereal........===now your getting me mad.
@pooty: Theres no way Quasar wins here....he isnt strong enough. Everything Quasar can do Superman can do and has done better. Please show me reasoning or prove the matter at hand.First of all, even if 100 people voted for Superman, it doesn't mean their opinions are right.
Besides PIS or CIS I see no reason why Superman would fall to Quasar.
@Cosmic_Falcon: Most ppl on the first page have already voted for Superman 2 win......just checking to see if you saw that. Otherwise please state reasons for why you think this and not just give a answer. Superman is way stronger than Quasar and faster.
The way authors use Galactus in comics is ridiculous. No way in hell ants like Quasar should be able to block Galactus attack. In fact, Galactus should be able to kill anyone with 1 blast unless he fights someone abstract level just like himself.B/S.Not PIS. Quasar is ridiculously powerful, it just by your perspective.
And then channeling power from a star is a impressive feat sure but these feats are up to par with Supermans and you have to admit that.
Superman can escape blackholes with ease
Superman battling Imperiex can can match this simple feat by itself.
Hal has to concentrate on constructs. Quasar can just make and leave them be.
Hal did the samething
None of those matter when Quasar can just pop up a sheild and stop Superman from doing anything and then Drain him. And Also, Quasar has Cosmic Awareness, which means he will know where Superman is coming from.
everything is a push and its down to who is stronger, faster, and more durable
@TheCerealKillz said:Really? The person who's name is Ultimate Survivor with the Doomsday picture and whom always when I see a Doomsday thread says Doomsday Wins is calling me a fanboy.@TheUltimateSurvivor: Your perspective. Your Opinion. Hunter Prey Doomsday is an ant.No, because you don't bring a freaking Entropy to put down an ant. Oh and sorry for hurting your fanboy feelings.
The **** did this come from?
You think Quasar is better than Galactus?
Your awful at reading. When did I ever say that? I didn't. I didnt even infer it.
Are you saying Quasar blocking Galactus eye lasars is a bigger feat than defeating Imperiex? O_O;
Keep Telling yourself that. The Scans prove that His are more better.
Hals contructs are stronger tho.
Superman will break thru any shield Quasar can put up around him
Just stop. Your just going against everything I've been saying. Read.
Superman will simply absorb energy out of Quasar
Superman has a faster absorbing rate than Quasar does
Cosmic Awareness. Hey look another thing you didn't read.
he will get to Quasar before Quasar can do much of anything
A Nega Bomb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Superman.
then Supes will knock him out.
I don't know the limit to Quasar's ability to siphon energy from anyone without permission, but I do know that he can do it within nano seconds Even if Superman was sundipped, wouldn't that technically just give Quasar more energy to steal?I agree that Quasar should take the majority but I honestly think that the nanosecond statement was partially hyperbole.
@SlimJ87D said:I don't think that he can completely drain someone in a nanosecond, I think all he met was that he was able to take parts of everyones energy and the shield to get them out of there. So he's capable of siphoning energy from someone with a thought, how much at a time is what we don't know. They only had like a nanosecond to get out because Lord Marvel literally blew them up with nanosecond forewarning.I don't know the limit to Quasar's ability to siphon energy from anyone without permission, but I do know that he can do it within nano seconds Even if Superman was sundipped, wouldn't that technically just give Quasar more energy to steal?I agree that Quasar should take the majority but I honestly think that the nanosecond statement was partially hyperbole.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment