Stormbreaker Thor vs Man of Steel Trio

@rajjar: Yeah, well, lan and I are CAVing this atm, and he has some interesting rebuttals. I recommend you give it a read

X

@xzone: This is such a close poll.

Thor stomps if it was one on one, but team stomps if it was a 1v3, he’ll get overwhelmed.

Okay just read the OP again and they're fully adapted, which means they can be scaled off of MoS Clark. There's no way I see Thor winning.

Any fully adapted Kryptonian solos.

@lan_fan: Well, yeah. 49 percent to 46 percent, but since when do polls matter?

X

@rampagethefirst: Personally, it seems more like the OP was saying a fully adapted Zod + faora + Nam, not that they were all adapted, and adapted faora/Nam don’t have any feats anyways, so it makes more sense here

X

Quite honestly, I’m surprised so many people think Faora or Nam are even factors here. They have no energy durability feats on par with Thor’s cloak, so they are basically one shot without Thor lifting a finger

X

@xzone: Judging by the number of post, the vote count, and quite diverse answers. I think this poll is pretty legit. It's just interesting how people are almost 50% split on this topic.

@lan_fan: Oh, I thought you were being sarcastic implying Thor was getting stomped in the poll

X

What? a fully adapted Kryptonian can be scaled off of another fully adapted Kryptonian.

@xzone: @lan_fan: if we replace Thor with Dr strange what will be the outcome ?

@supermanthor: He'd get blitzed much easier.

Strange gets blitzed and one shot by anyone here. To fight a kryptonian (or speedster in general) you must have at least one of three things:

• The speed to react/combat
• A shield or something acting on it's own that can defend you from something you are not fast enough to defend against
• Durability strong enough to tank a few hits

Thor has all three of these

DS hasNoneof them

X

@lan_fan: Kinda wanna make this same thread, but with semi-adapted zod instead of adapted. Think we would get a diff result?

X

@xzone: @lan_fan: and Russo force cap ?

@xzone: Probably not.

@supermanthor: That'd be untair, he'd stomp, easy.

@lan_fan: lol

@lan_fan: Think so? Now I’m tempted to make it

X

I am not gonna participate in those toxic and annoying arguments between MCU and DCEU fns because i am losing my time and mind doing this. Judging after intelligence and impressiveness of characters in my opinion Zod just casually beats Thor.

I am not gonna respond to be part of this toxic fanwar

@arthurcurry89: “says he doesn’t want to be in fan war” “says Zod can casually beat current Thor”

Care to CAV that?

X

Sorry man but CaV are not for me. Judging after your profile u love Thor, but CaV another guy. Those debates are not for me

@arthurcurry89: Probably because you can’t back up any of the stuff you say

X

Don't be like that, man. CaV isn't for everyone. It has a lot of factors other than not being able to back up your stance.

@lan_fan: The dude literally never backs anything up, just says someone wins and leaves, then calls anyone who shows his flaws a fanboy, so I’m calling his bluff. Since when did you care?

X

@xzone: Are you a child? Show some class, dude, not everyone wants to write essays every time someone disagrees with them.

@arthurcurry89: Prove you can back your words up here, then. Why does Zod casually beat Thor?

X

@rajjar: Alright, cool beans.

@reactor: Since when is it your business how I conduct my affairs with other people? The dude is obviously trolling, as you know very well

X

Because that kind of behavior is not only arrogant, but it's against the rules.

When you post your stuff on open forum, it's everybody's business.

@lan_fan: Saying someone can’t back their words up is now breaking the rules? Im curious now. How in the world am I being arrogant at all... I’m saying he’s making comments without being able to back them up.

X

@xzone: No, but challenging someone to a CaV in an antagonistic manner is.

@lan_fan: “Care to CAV that?” is antagonistic? Please

X

Thor, with high dif. Zod lasts the longest. Ligthing and SB should should make up for the speed gap. If kryptonians are susceptible to magic, it makes things easier.

@xzone: And then when he said no, you said this: Probably because you can’t back up any of the stuff you say.

If that doesn't sound antagonistic, then you're probably already blinded by your arrogance.

Please read the rules.

Watch Your Language and Attitude

Be respectful. Debating should be a civil discussion, not a malicious argument. Do not be obnoxious, do not troll, do not bait.

A common thing is saying “do you want to fight me in a CaV?” in an antagonistic manner. Don’t do it. CaVs are meant to be civil discussions, in which users should have mutual respect; they aren’t meant as challenges with the intent of proving a point or threatening to “humiliate” another person. This kind of attitude is wrong and it does nothing to positively contribute to the community.

Attack the argument, not the debater.

@xzone: Dude, we can all see your posts. You were clearly baiting him by claiming he was incapable of defending his stance if he wanted to. That's antagonistic. You then proceeded to imply he is a troll. That's antagonistic.

@reactor: @lan_fan: While I won’t say my comments were untrue, because they clearly are true, they were probably slightly out of line, ty for the info

X

The trio take it mid diff

@matthew660: Lmao, what are you on to? That was a joke. Are you really unsettled because I called you a "fan"? I didn't even say fanboy, wanker, or anything like that.

Thor doesn't solo them all, he would have a heck of a fight with Zod, and with the Faora and Nam-Ek, he is simply overwhelmed.

@reactor: @lan_fan: I would like to remind you I didn’t make those comments directly about this CAV proposal. I PM’d you some small amounts of what my comments were talking about. This guy has a history of not explaining crap. Now, I’ve admitted I was slightly rude, now leave me alone or call a mod

X

@lan_fan: Oh, it was hard to tell because when I denied it. You claimed I said mcu thanos beats cw music meister. My bad.

Yeah the trio still take it, especially since they're fully adapted. It'd be a whole new case if they weren't fully adapted. I don't see a single credible argument in favour of Thor.

@rampagethefirst: How about if they were semi-adapted? Bloodlusted.

@lan_fan: Semi-adapted, meaning, Zods level by the end of the movie? yeah they'd still stomp. Thor quite evidently has 0 combat feats on par with Kryptonians and his blown out of proportion reaction time feats that some users use are completely non-applicable since I can at least name 10 instances right of the top of my head where he has failed to use his so called "mach reaction speed/combat speed" in battle. The Kryptonians were effectively using their mach combat speed and reaction time in battle. He could definitely take a solid majority like 8-9/10 in a 1v1 against any of them but together, they casually stomp and you'd have to be borderline delusional or have no knowledge on Kryptonians to think otherwise.

There's also his "lightning cloak" that people use as a trump card, all while discarding the fact that SEVERAL Draugr's were tanking them. Thor is also highly susceptible to blunt force attacks and to everyone's surprise, Kryptonians literally excel in that sole field.

If semi-adapted would mean less than what Zod was by the end of the movie then I see Thor taking a slight majority, like 7/10.

@rampagethefirst: Semi-adapted Zod is when he was still unable to fly.

@lan_fan: Could go either way but I see Thor taking a slight majority. Thor's a lot stronger and could tank their hits without a problem, they wouldn't be able to tank much of his hits on the other hand.

Bruh. He is DianaAllMighty's alt. That is an objective premise from the get-go, not an implicit accusation.

And he dropped a CaV of Thor v. Faora anyway, which gives precedent to the first statement.

The "Care to CaV that" can only be construed as antagonistic by the frequency that xZone's been doing it. Otherwise, it is simply a tacit way of saying "I want to CaV you." And when Diana is baiting people with Beast>Thor, it is entirely acceptable for anyone really to tell him to put his money where his mouth is. The fact that he accepted, and then nope'd his way out of the issue only feeds into my justification warrants.