Spider-Man wins mostly due to the fact that he's limited to just his cards. Spider-Man would probably win either way, but Bullseye would definitely pose a threat.
They have already fought twice, to my knowledge. In the first one Bullseye proved his technical and strategic superiority, even though he wasn't there to fight Spider-man in the first place (the fight ended with Bullseye feeing the scene after he achieved his goal), and in the second, in New Ways to Die, Spider-man won while Bullseye had several advantages in his favour, but it was still a rather unorthodox fight. As it is, in a straight fight, I have no doubt Spider-man can, and will win it by a good margin, if only he is fighting with a certain degree of seriousness.
"They have already fought twice, to my knowledge. In the first one Bullseye proved his technical and strategic superiority, even though he wasn't there to fight Spider-man in the first place (the fight ended with Bullseye feeing the scene after he achieved his goal), and in the second, in New Ways to Die, Spider-man won while Bullseye had several advantages in his favour, but it was still a rather unorthodox fight. As it is, in a straight fight, I have no doubt Spider-man can, and will win it by a good margin, if only he is fighting with a certain degree of seriousness. "
Bullseye only has playing cards here. In the other matches, he had a much better arsenal at his disposal =P
"They have already fought twice, to my knowledge. In the first one Bullseye proved his technical and strategic superiority, even though he wasn't there to fight Spider-man in the first place (the fight ended with Bullseye feeing the scene after he achieved his goal), and in the second, in New Ways to Die, Spider-man won while Bullseye had several advantages in his favour, but it was still a rather unorthodox fight. As it is, in a straight fight, I have no doubt Spider-man can, and will win it by a good margin, if only he is fighting with a certain degree of seriousness. "
Bullseye only has playing cards here. In the other matches, he had a much better arsenal at his disposal =P "
I know. I was just explaining what happened in the other two encounters that I've seen them fight, and how that played out, and it is why I concluded that "in a straight fight" Spider-man should win.
Truth be told, if Spider-man is relatively serious, Bullseye's equipment doesn't have that much of a meaning anyway, unless he is fighting under favourable conditions.
"They have already fought twice, to my knowledge. In the first one Bullseye proved his technical and strategic superiority, even though he wasn't there to fight Spider-man in the first place (the fight ended with Bullseye feeing the scene after he achieved his goal), and in the second, in New Ways to Die, Spider-man won while Bullseye had several advantages in his favour, but it was still a rather unorthodox fight. As it is, in a straight fight, I have no doubt Spider-man can, and will win it by a good margin, if only he is fighting with a certain degree of seriousness. "
Bullseye only has playing cards here. In the other matches, he had a much better arsenal at his disposal =P "
I know. I was just explaining what happened in the other two encounters that I've seen them fight, and how that played out, and it is why I concluded that "in a straight fight" Spider-man should win.
Truth be told, if Spider-man is relatively serious, Bullseye's equipment doesn't have that much of a meaning anyway, unless he is fighting under favourable conditions. "
I'd say his equipment is a huge factor. Give him explosives and he could likely win. That's extremely far fetched, though, since he rarely uses them. Actually, I've only seen him use explosive devices twice, IIRC.
"They have already fought twice, to my knowledge. In the first one Bullseye proved his technical and strategic superiority, even though he wasn't there to fight Spider-man in the first place (the fight ended with Bullseye feeing the scene after he achieved his goal), and in the second, in New Ways to Die, Spider-man won while Bullseye had several advantages in his favour, but it was still a rather unorthodox fight. As it is, in a straight fight, I have no doubt Spider-man can, and will win it by a good margin, if only he is fighting with a certain degree of seriousness. "
Bullseye only has playing cards here. In the other matches, he had a much better arsenal at his disposal =P "
I know. I was just explaining what happened in the other two encounters that I've seen them fight, and how that played out, and it is why I concluded that "in a straight fight" Spider-man should win.
Truth be told, if Spider-man is relatively serious, Bullseye's equipment doesn't have that much of a meaning anyway, unless he is fighting under favourable conditions. "
I'd say his equipment is a huge factor. Give him explosives and he could likely win. That's extremely far fetched, though, since he rarely uses them. Actually, I've only seen him use explosive devices twice, IIRC. "
He didn't win with several people backing him up and Spider-man already shot and weakened, the last time. I say he must have a lot of explosives to take it. And explosives aren't much good if Spider-man can close the gap before he throws them. Which is why I said he still needs favourable conditions, despite the equipment he is carrying.
"They have already fought twice, to my knowledge. In the first one Bullseye proved his technical and strategic superiority, even though he wasn't there to fight Spider-man in the first place (the fight ended with Bullseye feeing the scene after he achieved his goal), and in the second, in New Ways to Die, Spider-man won while Bullseye had several advantages in his favour, but it was still a rather unorthodox fight. As it is, in a straight fight, I have no doubt Spider-man can, and will win it by a good margin, if only he is fighting with a certain degree of seriousness. "
Bullseye only has playing cards here. In the other matches, he had a much better arsenal at his disposal =P "
I know. I was just explaining what happened in the other two encounters that I've seen them fight, and how that played out, and it is why I concluded that "in a straight fight" Spider-man should win.
Truth be told, if Spider-man is relatively serious, Bullseye's equipment doesn't have that much of a meaning anyway, unless he is fighting under favourable conditions. "
I'd say his equipment is a huge factor. Give him explosives and he could likely win. That's extremely far fetched, though, since he rarely uses them. Actually, I've only seen him use explosive devices twice, IIRC. "
He didn't win with several people backing him up and Spider-man already shot and weakened, the last time. I say he must have a lot of explosives to take it. And explosives aren't much good if Spider-man can close the gap before he throws them. Which is why I said he still needs favourable conditions, despite the equipment he is carrying. "
I wasn't disputing that battle at all. I was just saying certain equipment could alter the outcome. I think it would require heavy duty equipment though to give him the edge. Also, I wouldn't say having HAMMER troops (aka cannon fodder) is exactly something to boast about, either.
Also, you're under the impression all explosives he would use must be thrown. There's a large variety, some could be detonated, trigged manually, etc. But to give him all of these would just make it too unfair. As is, I really don't see a way to make this match balanced. Despite my liking of Bullseye, if you give him standard equipment, he should lose. If you arm him too heavily, Spider-Man should lose. I don't really see a balance anywhere.
I wasn't disputing that battle at all. I was just saying certain equipment could alter the outcome. I think it would require heavy duty equipment though to give him the edge. Also, I wouldn't say having HAMMER troops (aka cannon fodder) is exactly something to boast about, either.
When Spider-man is unknowingly carrying a device that successfully targets him despite the shooter's accuracy, I say it's a pretty good advantage.
And even for cover fire, when Spider-man has to dodge bullets from multiple angles while being up against the best marksman in the MU, it gives Lester an opening.
Also, you're under the impression all explosives he would use must be thrown. There's a large variety, some could be detonated, trigged manually, etc. But to give him all of these would just make it too unfair. As is, I really don't see a way to make this match balanced. Despite my liking of Bullseye, if you give him standard equipment, he should lose. If you arm him too heavily, Spider-Man should lose. I don't really see a balance anywhere.
I can see that. But being detonated/trigged, etch would mean Bullseye would have set them up prior to the fight (or I am just too far behind in explosives and the developments on that field).
I wasn't disputing that battle at all. I was just saying certain equipment could alter the outcome. I think it would require heavy duty equipment though to give him the edge. Also, I wouldn't say having HAMMER troops (aka cannon fodder) is exactly something to boast about, either.
When Spider-man is unknowingly carrying a device that successfully targets him despite the shooter's accuracy, I say it's a pretty good advantage.
And even for cover fire, when Spider-man has to dodge bullets from multiple angles while being up against the best marksman in the MU, it gives Lester an opening.
Also, you're under the impression all explosives he would use must be thrown. There's a large variety, some could be detonated, trigged manually, etc. But to give him all of these would just make it too unfair. As is, I really don't see a way to make this match balanced. Despite my liking of Bullseye, if you give him standard equipment, he should lose. If you arm him too heavily, Spider-Man should lose. I don't really see a balance anywhere.
I can see that. But being detonated/trigged, etch would mean Bullseye would have set them up prior to the fight (or I am just too far behind in explosives and the developments on that field). "
This brings it multiple factors including prep, location, starting distance and so on.
I wasn't disputing that battle at all. I was just saying certain equipment could alter the outcome. I think it would require heavy duty equipment though to give him the edge. Also, I wouldn't say having HAMMER troops (aka cannon fodder) is exactly something to boast about, either.
When Spider-man is unknowingly carrying a device that successfully targets him despite the shooter's accuracy, I say it's a pretty good advantage.
And even for cover fire, when Spider-man has to dodge bullets from multiple angles while being up against the best marksman in the MU, it gives Lester an opening.
Also, you're under the impression all explosives he would use must be thrown. There's a large variety, some could be detonated, trigged manually, etc. But to give him all of these would just make it too unfair. As is, I really don't see a way to make this match balanced. Despite my liking of Bullseye, if you give him standard equipment, he should lose. If you arm him too heavily, Spider-Man should lose. I don't really see a balance anywhere.
I can see that. But being detonated/trigged, etch would mean Bullseye would have set them up prior to the fight (or I am just too far behind in explosives and the developments on that field). "
This brings it multiple factors including prep, location, starting distance and so on. "
Log in to comment