Use feats from Comic and TV Show
Round 1: In a battle with their best weapons
Round 2: H2H
Round 3: Be a fanboy and choose your winners.
Round4: Gannicus and Spartacus vs Oenomaus and Crixus
VS
Gannicus and O(thats what I'm calling him).O was still better than both Crixus and Spartacus before the fall of Batiatus. And Gannicus was able to match O. Spartacus and Crixus are good, but not as good as team 2.
its better you had said all of the vs the shadow of death. G and O have too much skill for the thracian and gaul
1- team 2
2- idk, probably team 2 but we don't see a lot of h2h feats for either team.
3- Andy Whitfield Spartacus > new Spartacus = Gannicus. Crixus would win too lol.
4- Gannicus and Spartacus.
Round 1-The weak link on Team 1 is really Crixus. However, I don't think Oenomaus is really as strong as everybody else here thinks he is. However, Gannicus and Oenomaus probably have too much experience and tactical/strategic knowledge for Spartacus.
Round 2-I don't know if I've ever seen a strict h2h fight in the show, lol.
Round 3-Andy Whitfield Spartacus>Gannicus>new Spartacus>Crixus = Oenomaus
Round 4-Gannicus and Spartacus in a stomp.
@SlimJ87D said:
@ChaosBlazer: YES! Someone bumped it!
Andy Whitfield just had the character nailed down. Liam is not bad, but Andy was just too damn good.
lol just finished up Gods of the Arena so came here to hunt down threads to answer.
And agreed, RIP Andy!
@GhostRider2 said:
Team 1, Spartacus is better than all of them.
possibly so, but he can't beat Gannicus and Oenomaeus, which may happen if Crixus can't hold his own.
@uberhikari said:
Round 1-The weak link on Team 1 is really Crixus. However, I don't think Oenomaus is really as strong as everybody else here thinks he is. However, Gannicus and Oenomaus probably have too much experience and tactical/strategic knowledge for Spartacus.
Round 2-I don't know if I've ever seen a strict h2h fight in the show, lol.
Round 3-Andy Whitfield Spartacus>Gannicus>new Spartacus>Crixus = Oenomaus
Round 4-Gannicus and Spartacus in a stomp.
Spartacus got really good once be became champion and it always seemed like he eclipsed Crixus but then again Spartacus 2.0 I'll call him never really faced off against a %100 Crixus. Crixus was hurt and still healing and didn't have time to practice. Then they drugged him in the last fight and Spartacus wasn't trying to find him. I don't think we have a good measure of Crixus at %100 since he became handicap half way through season 1, and was a noob in season 2.
As for Oenomaus, I think his hype hurt him more than his performance. In season 3 (or 2 some people call it since they consider season 2 season 0) he fought for days in those really dangerous fights.
I think Spartacus is the best out of all 4 of them though. I think any team he is in will be considered the winner. He did the best against the Egyptian out of all 4 of them.
I know ABC logic doesn't always work because like Pokemon, one may beat one while he can't beat the other. But against the Egyptian only, it definitely was Spartacus that did the best. Oenomaus and Crixus are about equal in their performance, Crixus gets points because he was the first I believe to face the Egyptian and probably wasn't expecting him to be so good thus giving his comrades fair warnings when they faced him. Gannicus I cannot say when comparing to the Egyptian because he never truly fought him 1 on 1.
I can definitely say Spartacus > Then all of them. Can't wait for season 4, I know Spartacus and Crixus will have a battle for sure since in history they begin to have conflicts.
by war of the damned, sparty, gannicus and crixus were far above everyone else in the series in skill and experience. they cut their way through whole armies of romans. agron, nasir, naevia, onomaeus, egyptian and crassus are just one tier below them but below nonetheless.
oenomaus holds his own vs crixus but not enough. gannicus is considered equal to spartacus.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment