@eredin12:
We only see red inside him, in the hole, that is how insides look like, but not blood coming out.
Now you are right about that but reason is that DD used piecing attack, something FAR more concentrated than Nuke that hit him, as well as Clark being weakened due to being near Kryptonite
If anyone were to take an explosion, they would be evaporated or their limbs torn off from the force. For superman to keep it together is a very impressive standard to hold. I was never saying he tanked it, but he took a city busting blast enough to survive.
The explosion in space that we saw on screen was not that big though, the light bulb in my room can light up entire room despite being very small, ofc there was still collateral damage, blast we saw bellow but that was a small fraction of Nuke, he absorbed most of it and it, and as they say it built up inside his body, was too much for him to contain and he blessed it on an island in 2 miles large blast
For how high they were in space, thats massive, thats not a small fraction of a nuke. If you were to see a large airplane in the sky it would be a dot. They were high enough up in the atmosphere to reach space and see the Earth's circumference, and the blast still showed a shockwave and light bright enough that even if it was cloudy, the whole city lit up. The only thing that could ever do something of that scale is a nuke.
Even if you say the nuke was partially absorbed, whatever i described it in, its still far higher than whats ever been shown in Wakanda.
Doomsday basically does what Shaw does in X Man movies, absorb energy that way
Shaw contains explosions for them not to happen. That never happened at all with Doomsday. We see it right here.
How could you still keep claiming that after seeing this???
These guys did, they said impacts are comparable to large meteors
If you could highlight a part where they said it was comparable to megatons of TNT, i would gladly appreciate that. Again, the size of meteors is very subjective to thought. What you consider large enough for a megaton of damage might not be the same for them.
And with meteors or stuff like that, unless stated otherwise in verse, we use their Reentry level speed for KE of impact,
but ofc we do not use F=MA with characters to judge who hits harder, we use their feats. They said meteors large enough to hit the Ground without exploding in the atmosphere and those are around Megaton level.
The verse itself literally showed the damage done. Whatever you are assuming for the meteor is so different that what was ever shown. If an actual megaton meteor was to hit earth, the damage would be visualized much bigger than what the ship showed.
What you are saying, goes against the actual vision of the directors when they wanted to make the scene with the ships. Why are you trying to scale the impact as a hundreds times more powerful than what is actual shown on scene?
Meteor or not, the writers don't have the same idea of the word as you do when it comes to visualizing the damage.
That is as faulty as saying if they wanted Vegeta punch to be above planet level, Earth would be destroyed, writers ignore colder all damage pretty much all the time due to plot, not to ruin it
I don't know Dragon Ball, but if they already have feats for planet busting, theres no reason to think they couldn't in spite of where they are. Thats not the same for the ship.
Thor did not struggle to back up after being hit by Repulsors though, he was just sent flying, you can find something irritating without it being able hurt/ cause any damage, the reason thor let go is that he was not braced while being hit by that repulsor, not cause it hurt, also that was Avengers Iron Man, my 100 000x times quote was about pre-Avengers Tony
For any kind of warrior especially someone like Thor and Loki, to let go of your weapon is the last thing you'd want to do. Braced or not, you are gripping your weapon. For you to let go, means it was something strong enough to hurt you.
Also you can brace for something and take damage and still hold your weapon. Thats not uncommon in any medium.
Superman actually got knocked out by a bullet, so yeah... seems like filmakers did have that thought
So they consistently do hurt him, we have statements both showing that they do and that they do not, and feats like him being knocked out to tip the scale
I don't think highly of the Superman that just started out. He'd get knocked out by literally anything and just discovered how to fly. Anything afterwards he just keeps getting more and more impressive throughout the film. To a point he could take the World Engine and beat Zod at full power when he was getting ragdolled by Faora beforehand.
In B v S the explosion at the building did nothing to him, not even phase him. That would be stronger than the bullets that were shot at him.
So Superman is not that much above bullets?
Did you not understand what I just said :/.
That was Avengers Iron Man, not one that falls in that 100 000 x quote first of all, he improved, and second, Tony is strong but he was fodder to Thor, there is a quote saying Thor was holding back in the fight and could destroy him any time he wanted to, none of his repulsors was hurting Thor
Holding back in a fight means not having the intent or go straight for kill. It doesn't mean you'd just let yourself get ragdolled, kicked, shot and combo'd. Thats like saying Thor is just letting himself get ragdolled but for a guy as prideful as him, why would he let himself look ridiculed. Or even letting the guy get the best of you by shooting you in the face when you were gripping his arms only to let go afterwards because you were shot in the face.
By all means, fodder means he would be treating Iron Man like any minion, but that wasn't the case.
But i do think that he can hurt Loki though, as i said Avengers Tony >>>>>Iron Man 2 Tony, who my quote referred to.
So you are saying Iron Man got 100,000x stronger? Thats too much of a stretch..... stronger or double or several if stretching seems reasonable but 100,000x? Excuse me?
Log in to comment