Planets vs mountains

Vaporizing a mountain requires more energy no questions

@universeichigo1: Sure...and cut in half a pizza >>> bust down our galaxy. Let alone if it's a 4 Formaggi pizza. ?

Is this a joke?

Planet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mountain.

Easily.

@reaver_hawk: well I don't know how that relates

But it is pure science

how in the world can you argue a mountain would require more energy?

@itouchedtheboat: because you are vaporizing a mountain it obviously take more energy to vaporize anything than to cut it

??????

Cutting a planet. A mountain is a absurdly small amount of a planet.

What?

lol what?

Obviously a mountain. Thats why Goku>>>>>> Superman.

Planet

Destroying a mountain requires much more energy than a planet, that's just obvious.

Mountain obviously, not even galactus can shatter mount everest and he eats planets for lunch

@universeichigo1: What!? Obviously cutting in half a 4 Formaggi pizza requires a huge amount of energy than bust down a planet or a galaxy. Have you ever seen World Breaker Hulk cutting in half a 4 Formaggi pizza or a Capricciosa pizza? What about Chakravartin? He vaporized stars and planets like a child play but he never cut in half a pizza! Not even a small piece of it. Galactus? Nope.?

Back to the topic: was Destructor Asura able to vaporize a mountain? Okay he can casually spam star buster blasts and punch through super huge planets in seconds...but i've never seen Destructor Asura vaporize a mountain. ?

I mean it's pure science. ??

@universeichigo1: No. Mass is everything when we're talking about gravity and energy.

Busting a mountain like Mt. McKinley can be done with kt nukes if placed right. Vaping one is several orders of magnitude higher, but not even close to what it would take to reach to the core in one burst of a directed energy weapon, much less slice it cleanly in half.

This isn't even close.

You might even be able to argue that cutting the mountain would be more difficult than vaping it.

What about atomising a hill? That's what I want to know.

Obviously mountains. The earth is flat, so it has much less height. Height requires energy to destroy.

Mountains are taller.

So they require more energy. /thread.

Doesnt a planet... Have mountains?

Shhh! Stop using common sense :/

@monstrous93: oh ok. Planets are brick level. Mountains stomp

Lmfao

Planets have the defense of a wet napkin, what is this garbage. Super Man can chuck planets across the galaxy, but I'll be damned if the man can lift a mountain. That's absurd. Mountain durability stomps. In GOT they call him the mountain, not the planet. Another clear feat. For mountains.

Vaporizing a mountain still yields lower energy values than flat out cutting the earth in one single go (expecting the used blade is rather slim, aka a regular sword).

However atomicaly annihilating an Everest sized mountain would in turn require far more energy than cutting the earth. You all know the saying: There are more grains of sand on the beach than stars in the sky, but more atoms in one grain of sand than stars in the universe.

Well, people have argued that Ben Grimm should be planet level. Hulk is stronger than him. Hulk lifted a mountain in Secret Wars. Therefore, a mountain is heavier than a planet.

It's empirical proof guys./end thread.

Stay in school kids....Stay in school

Acnologia and luffy >>>>>>> Toneri Otsutsuki confirmed.

Splitting a planet.

lol, Planets can be harmed by plastic bottles.

earth is 70% water. solid rock -> water

mountain stomps

Ichigo is Planet level confirmed boiz. He vaporised a Mountain. GG Nardoverse. Ok, but seriously, no. Just no.

Remember when DCEU batman could tank being in the sun and an helicopter explosion could bust earth. Man, 2017 on vine was good times

@HitTheAssasin: shh, ichigo busted a large Hill.

toneir isnt planetary not even close

Has the planet got a poisoned spear?

mountains... they're huge.

Obviously mountains. They're like, bigger than skyscrapers:)

HA!

I don't understand where you're friend is coming from here. There is simply no question.

1. You'd have to be vaporizing mountains (or things with very similar composite to mountains) just to START cutting a planet in half (well, unless it's a gas giant...still you'd have other problems there)
2. A mountain if a MINISCULE amount of matter in comparison to even a small planet (say the size of Mercury). The estimated mass of Mt Everest is around 10^13 Kg...the estimated Mass of Mercury is 3.285 TIMES 10^23 Kg.

If you're friend still isn't on board show him that...if not show him a globe and put a little a little bit of mud that's got maybe ten grains of sand on the globe...that'd be Mt Everest...or close enough to it.

Feats for Mount Everest ?

Vaporizing a mountain like Mount Everest requires much more energy than cutting a planet, that's just obvious. Science and numbers.

It depends, slicing a planet in half require more manpower, blowing it in half would probably require more energy than vaporizing a mountain

You know you could've just googled this right? Or use common sense?

To completely vaporize a mountain takes a lot of energy, but cutting through a planet (even if it is linear cuts) is still destroying way more rock/earth than vaporizing a mountain.

@rickyrck: Uh, that's the Earth's surface... There is 60km of solid crust, before you enter the basically solid outer mantle, which goes down for hundreds more km. Merely cutting through 120km of crust (to account for the entry and exit of whatever is cutting it in half) would require more energy than vaporising a mountain.

Earth looks small when I see it in an image, mountains look big when I see them in Las Vegas.

Mountains >>>> planets.

@laurus: i know lol it was a joke

If it's, say, a 1 atom width cut it might be less energy. Actually executing that is another thing entirely, but in principle it could be less energy than vaporizing a mountain.

Guys I'm confused