@theoriginalone: Well yea, it is just the one feat...n let's specify it's the lowest end of planet level (arguably continental, when you start to ask things like "how deep into the surface are we talking here"). You dont have to convince me that it's in a completely different league than anything else he's done. And I'll go as far to say that in many situations, you would see this in outliers...but it's a symptom, not the cause. That's not what makes it an outlier, it just often accompanies them. In this case, we have specified context supporting Saitama's ability to do so, in that everything else he's done was vastly restrained. (< answer to ur question btw "what context explains the situation")
You want an OPM outlier? Tatsumaki's FTL meteor. It happened, but we've seen the limits of her ability later on in cases like the Monster Association battle and her vs Saitama, and it's clearly nowhere near summoning a freakin meteor. That's what makes it an outlier, nothing else. But you'll see...it only happened once, it's in a different league than anything else she's done, ect...but these are symptoms, not the cause. Contextually, she has fallen apart under doing far less...unlike Saitama, it doesn't support her. That's the difference.
Noone is...hold on, I'll ammend that...I'M not saying Saitama has no limits, nor that the fact that his limits haven't been shown is a "feat". It's not a feat, it is supporting evidence FOR a feat. That's why people keep bringing it up...not as a feat, but to explain an actual feat. Everything he's ever done on panel has been below his highest potential, it's a canon fact and a valid support for a reasonable arguement. Emphasizing "reasonable" like...so much right now.
No no lol what is this, guilty until proven innocent? If a series shows a feat, it's valid until proven invalid. I mean...that's basically what a story is, a collection of showings and feats...ignoring them soley for something arbitrary like the number of times it happened is like ignoring the story itself. The only issue comes when something blatently contradicts something else, anyone telling you otherwise was likely getting desperate in their arguement.
Log in to comment