"
@weaponmaster said:
"
@Deranged Midget said:
"
@weaponmaster: Loki never had an edge on Thor. Thor could've easily stopped him in an instant as he did to take out his clones. He had no intention of killing his brother. He was easily holding back. Both Hancock and Thor had their own feats in their respective universes. I say Thor would win due to having a larger set of abilities due to Mjolner. Yes, Hancock was never been hurt in the film besides when he fought his mate, but nothing in the film posed a threat to him. Guns, Street thugs, a train? It's not really that impressive.We can't completely judge Thor yet as he hasn't displayed more of his potential, but Hancock does have him beat in the strength department so far. I would say they are equal in flight speed. Thor had impressive durability. Taking on countless frost giants, the Giant frost monster, and the Destroyer(weakened) without a scratch. What Thor took on was far more impressive than what Hancock had endured.
"
Youre basing your stance on emotions and not logic.
What abilities did Njolnir exhibit in the movie that would even hurt Hancock?
The train stoppage was extremely impressive. Thor got hit by a frost giant and knocked back and down. Hancock didnt even flinch.
This isn't about Thors "potential" this is about feats he showed in the movie and none of them would even affect Hancock.
What was Thor hit with in the movie that does the damage of a train at full speed? He blocked things that Hancocks would simply shrug off.
How is Thor going to deal with Hancocks Super-speed?
"
I never said one is far superior to the other. I simply compared them.
We don't know how the mystical properties of Mjolnir would affect Hancock since he hasn't faced anything remotely close to that in his universe.
The train stoppage was impressive but Hancock readied himself and was prepared for the impact. Thor was cocky and had no preparation. He jumped head first into battle.
How do you know that? Everything Hancock achieved Thor could easily replicate. Throwing a whale? Flying fast? Stopping a train? I already mentioned Hancock could be superior to Thor in the strength department but that doesn't give him the win.
Yes, Thor never stopped a direct hit from a train. I doubt Hancock would easily shrug off Mjolnir thrown at him at full speed. Thor demolished many Frost giants with one throw, dropped the Destroyer(weakened I know), and destroyed the Rainbow bridge(Bifrost) with the power of Mjolnir.
What super speed? He never ran, he never had a fast combat speed. It was all flight speed. Thor demonstrated the same.
"
In the movie Mjolnir did not affect any magical based creature any differently. You are using conjecture and speculation.
Youre making excuses for Thor. Blows that affected thor in the movoe and attacks that Thor Blocked with Mjolnir would not have affected Hancock in the least.
You are again basing what you doubt on emotions and not on emperical evidence. Mjolnir was not even shown in the movie to cause even as much damage as a train at full speed would cause except perhaps, debatebly, the earthquake, which was used on very porous rock that was partially ice as well. Hancock was unharmed by being struck by someone as strong as he is with a truck and a tractor.
Thor destroyed Bifrost after many, many, many blows.
Ok. Your last comment tells me you either have not seen Hancock, have a poor memory, or are pretending to not remember. Hancock cut off the villains hand by throwing a flattened metal lamp shade and grabbed the detonator before the thumb came of the switch. That is super-speed. Not just flight speed.
Log in to comment