Who is better h2h combatant ?
Thor has better H2H feats. The agents feat aside, he held his own against a physically superior opponent (Hela) for a time and displayed pretty impressive H2H skill both then and in the bridge scene.
Hard to say, although out of Thor's age one would come to think he is more experienced. However due to his experience been with a massive strength and power he does not posses now... That experience is somewhat rended less valuable.
Neither have shown greater skill than the other, due to their usual fighting stiles that rely on their powers.
Thor has better H2H feats. The agents feat aside, he held his own against a physically superior opponent (Hela) for a time and displayed pretty impressive H2H skill both then and in the bridge scene.
firstly all are equalised + to me hela was traiting him like throwing bag to me
@sexybayonetta22: Eh, once he entered god mode they fought fairly evenly and he did manage to land about 6-7 hits on her in the throne room scene when she had a pretty big physical advantage. Plus, they'd clearly been fighting for at least a minute off-screen based on positioning, so he managed to avoid being taken out for quite some time despite physicals.
@helloman: no power Thor stomp he solo Agents shield
no power Aquaman no have a feat he Lose.
Thor due to having legit depowered H2H feats.
Aquaman has no real H2H feats. Thor wins this.
Aquaman has no real H2H feats. Thor wins this.
He actually has many in movie. Just like Mera or Atlanna or training with Vulko
He actually has many in movie. Just like Mera or Atlanna or training with Vulko
Most of his feats are with tridents. No noteworthy H2H ones.
He actually has many in movie. Just like Mera or Atlanna or training with Vulko
Most of his feats are with tridents. No noteworthy H2H ones.
i would have to rewatch movie to discuss
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment