It barely cut through it, which isn't impressive singe guys like Angel and Cyclops damaged his armor before.
I can never concede anything to you, simply because you arguments are so dumb they refute themselves.
That doesn't mean Apoc is as durable as Exitar, how are you this dumb?
Umm yeah you put up old scans from the 70s where his armor doesnt even look the same.
Prove apocalypse was wearing celestial armour in those scans. Nothing shows, states nor implies hes wearing celestial armour there.
It does mean apocalypses armor is as durable as exitars armor. which is all that matters here. and they didn't even damage his armor there.
There is no absorption device, his whole body can absorb attacks, that still doesn't take away that Thor couldn't cut through him at all, the absorbption absorbs the kinect power behind a blow it does not render Janjborn less sharp, the problem is it was not sharp enough to do damage. 7 average showings vs 4 bad ones.
no, he obviously had a device on his arm which is what he used to block the strike from thor, that device was what absorbed the impact. no, theres 10 very impressive showings vs 3 bad/average ones, unfortunately you cant ignore feats just because you dont like them. we go by consistency and take all feats into account.
Where was it stated to be secondary adamantium?
Again that wasn't WBH and exactly the point. you just assumed it's the same weapon, we actually have no idea where RSH got the sword from or how powerful it is, other than it can cut through Hulk. Steel can't cut through Hulk so it can't be a steel sword. The sword has cutting feats, it cut Hulk who resists getting cut by anything other than magical weapons, admantium/vibranium and even then he resists those to a certain degree.
where was it stated to be primary adamantium?
umm no it was world breaker hulk, red she hulk nearly killed him.
umm the weapon wasnt stated. its ironic how you start talking about we have no idea what the sword was or where rsh got it, yet with heimdalls sword you try arguing its somehow "weak" even though its confirmed to be uru and is superior to every weapon thats cut everyone below thanos in this gauntlet. there is no rule that steel cant cut hulk, no, you need to show feats from the sword, cutting hulk is not a feat, otherwise heimdalls sword cut mangog so thats a feat?
youre trying to say a uru sword cutting mangog means mangog was weakened but then youre trying to say a featless steel sword cutting world breaker hulk is a super powerful sword because it cut hulk? mental gymnastics dont work in debates, man.
As stated by Tony, Thors strength alone wasn't enough. Thor together with a weapon doesn't hit as hard as Hulk with just his fists.
Hulk has almost never even used a sword lol, what a stupid question.
Yes he did, he literally stomped a city
and i said ALMOST broke a continent, the key word being almost, if he actually broke it he would have killed millions of people there.
That's actually absolute nonsense, take something even as simple as bullets who both produce shockwaves and can cause environmental damage.
Again all of this nonsense from you is debunked with this
thor while unworthy, weaker, sad and reluctant almost broke clean through a bunker that hulk couldnt scratch until thor weakened it first. no he didnt almost break a continent, he was merely cracking the eastern seaboard with his gamma radiating footsteps.
no bullets dont produce shockwaves, no they do not cause environmental damage. they damage whatever they strike.
terraxs axe emits energy, regardless being strong and having a sharp weapon does not mean you are going to cut through an entire planet or country in one swipe, unless you have some method of acceleration or flight whereby you can move yourself forward without needing to move your arms or legs to do so. unworthy thor doesnt have superspeed and he doesnt have flight, at least not the flight someone like superman has. thus he would only be able to cut through like 5-10 feet of distance in one swipe.
Yes Uru metal and as we saw with Thors latest comic those can still break like glass. That's because Heimdall went for a stab and it wasn't to his tail, while Thor was aiming to cut it clean off. It's ironic an imbecile like you calls for mental gymnastics.
Axe failed to cut Powerman, Chulk, a bunker and barely cut Apoc initially.
Apoc armor is not indestructible by any means, even regular Mljonir has blown a hole through Apocs chest and killed him.
I don't need to prove a negative, what you need to prove to me is cutting weapons failling to cut Gorr or Onslaught, until then they are featless.
Ah, then that makes things a lot easier. world breaker hulk got killed by red she hulks steel sword.
the axe cut through the bunker and cut apocalypses celestial armor in addition to others mentioned before.
10 good showings supersede and override 2 bad showings.
no, in thors latest comic the hammers broke because they weren't pure uru, stated and confirmed on panel.
heimdall cut mangog and thor cut mangog, they have weapons made out of the same stuff.
saying mangog is weak because heimdall cut him is mental gymnastics because heimdalls sword is made out of the same stuff as thors hammer.
And then failed to properly cut through 4 other things.
10 good showings supersede 2 bad ones. consistency rules.
Logically he shouldn't be, but hey what can you do i guess Aarons characters are just written as weaker than Paks are i mean Mangog dies to the Sun, Mljonir melts in it, Thor almost dies to falling on sharp rocks, gets almost drowned in poisoned water, almost dies to the cold, etc...
thors durability isnt relevant here, what is relevant is his axe which we know will take him to thanos easily, and then he could pass thanos depending on whether thanos has shields on.
Yea except we average out the consistency while you try to ignore those other showings, so that's not how consistency works.
And Janjborn is not above Hulks power output, at least not in Thors hands which was clearly shown and underlined in a comic where Thor failed to get through the bunker that Hulk one-shot through. I love how the writers built up to that moment and made a clear difference between Hulk and Thors strength by having Hulk one up Thor.
I am looking forward to many more examples of that especially when Hulk fights the Avengers again, although i gotta admit it's not as impressive as it used to be seeing as even She Hulk can one up Thor nowadays.
lol, there is no way to "average" showings. if a weapon busts a planet then fails to bust a city, explain how you "average" this? its impossible. we go by consistency which means we go by where a characters generally portrayed at. regardless if youre saying we "average things out" he still easily clears up to thanos. i mean the fact that he cut destroyer armor and galactus, even when averaged out, means hes clearing everyone below thanos easily.
yea this one upping stuff doesnt really make sense they just had thor take down the most powerful juggernaut ever and the hulk being used in this thread was stomped by a much weaker juggernaut and couldnt draw blood from him. this is also the part where youve conceded because you already brought up thor nearly dying from sharp rocks and his hammers breaking on juggernaut. so you cant pick and choose snippets of a comic to use as anti feats but then when the comic shows good feats act like they never happened. either the comics feats are valid or they arent.
thors durability doesnt matter at all, the axe has obviously been shown time and time again to be capable of easily taking down people in this thread below thanos and i can guarantee you if thanos was going up against it they would have him use his shields or armor to block it rather than tanking it directly on his person which he cant really do. just like they did with apoc.
Log in to comment