@Aristeaus: whether the beam neutron star beam was impressive is subjective. The size of the star, and the heat of the star are also factors that act independently of each other from my knowledge.
I merely asked the size of the death star beam to know how much of it would hit Thor. The rest of it's extremely large yield is worthless in this discussion.
The comparison of power between the star feat and the ds laser is also something I did not bring up at all. Which I favor the ds laser on in case you're wondering...
They are not independent of one another.
Luminosity and Mass are directly proportional to one another. Its called the Mass-Luminosity relation.
It is so important, in fact, that a star 20 times larger then the sun is 10,000 times more luminous.
This is also true of the inverse. A star 20 times smaller then the sun, is 10,000 times LESS luminous.
A star 1 Quintilian times smaller? Well, you do the math. Its not subjective at all. The feat is horrendously unimpressive.
That is not even taking into account that Neutron stars alone are much, much, much less luminous then regular stars to begin with.
If that star existed ( which, by the way, in cannot exist in real life... its too small to hold itself together ), that beam likely wouldn't even bust a house.
Log in to comment