THOR (No Stormbreaker)
vs
2003 HULK
Battle rules
- In character
- Win by KO or incap (no BFR)
- Battle takes place in the dessert.
Who wins?
If Thor isn't allowed to kill him then Thor can at least knock him out with enough lightning and battering. If death was allowed then Thor would take his head off with one hit.
@cocacolaman: It's IW Thor but without Stormbreaker
@buckwheat: AH, missed that
Thor wins anyway. It was implied he could have beaten MCU Hulk without a weapon back in Ragnarok.
Before anyone says Thor wins via lightning cloak. Check out Absorbing man's putting enough electricity through Banner to black out a full city. Hulk isn't even faded.
Bana's Hulk is above Ruffalo's Hulk in every possible way.
Before anyone says Thor wins via lightning cloak. Check out Absorbing man's putting enough electricity through Banner to black out a full city. Hulk isn't even faded.
Bana's Hulk is above Ruffalo's Hulk in every possible way.
My God. Seeing Hulk being pulled by lightning through clouds...This shit is still cool!
His dad being Absorbing-Man is still a weird choice ,though.
OT: Thor eventually takes it. Just better feats overall.
Thor shitstomp
Shitstomps? Really?
Before anyone says Thor wins via lightning cloak. Check out Absorbing man's putting enough electricity through Banner to black out a full city. Hulk isn't even faded.
Bana's Hulk is above Ruffalo's Hulk in every possible way.
If I'm not mistaken that feat is roughly comparable to a small nuke, like the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I definitely don't think that's above Thor's capabilities by IW/Ragnarok.
Before anyone says Thor wins via lightning cloak. Check out Absorbing man's putting enough electricity through Banner to black out a full city. Hulk isn't even faded.
Bana's Hulk is above Ruffalo's Hulk in every possible way.
If I'm not mistaken that feat is roughly comparable to a small nuke, like the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I definitely don't think that's above Thor's capabilities by IW/Ragnarok.
I see what you did there. By using the adjective "small" before nuke, you trivialize the feat.
Just like my ex trivialized the uncanny shapeshifting abilities of my d*ck. Well done.
Nonetheless that's Hulk surviving a head on nuclear blast, right there.
Also showing Hulk to be inmune to lighting strikes.
What other stuff can Thor dish out? Blunt damage I would say...
And seen how him and Ruffalos' Hulk are sort of equals on the blunt department, I don't find it outrageous that Bruce Bana could fair better than his more recent interpretation.
Wouldn't you agree monsieur?
Thor shitstomp
Shitstomps? Really?
Yeah, he does.
Care to elaborate...?
Thor stomps. Vastly stronger, hits harder, and is too durable for Hulk to harm. Has lightning that can one shot Hulk as well.
Thor stomps. Vastly stronger, hits harder, and is too durable for Hulk to harm. Has lightning that can one shot Hulk as well.
I see what you did there. By using the adjective "small" before nuke, you trivialize the feat.
It's not an understatement. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were small nukes and those are the ones that this feat would compare to.
Nonetheless that's Hulk surviving a head on nuclear blast, right there.
Also showing Hulk to be inmune to lighting strikes.
Just as a comparison here, Thor's Sokovia feat was easily hundreds of kilotons, likely in the megaton category. True it was charged and he didn't do it all on his own, but even considering that, it's not a stretch to assume that a stronger Thor could match and surpass the power Hulk took in the video you posted if he needed to.
Weaker versions of Thor beat this Hulk. MCU Hulk is already above Ang Lee via scaling and this Thor would cleave MCU Hulk.
Hulk. Insane energy absorption + like comic Hulk he grows significantly larger and stronger as he gets angrier, unlike MCU Hulk.
If this were MCU then Thor would throttle but Ang Lee Hulk gets exponentially stronger and faster in almost an instant. He'd adapt to Thor pretty quickly as he did everything else.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment