Iron Man definetely has what it takes to put Nam Ek down considering Hulk could't dent Thanos and Iron Man managed to scratch him. However Thanos is a very large, slow moving target compared to Nam-Ek and Tony needed massive help to get close enough to deliver those shots. Iron Man couldn't even beat Obsidian Cull with the help of Spider Man and Nam-eK is literally Obsidian Cull with super speed.
If Iron Man had prep and assitance he could be able to get close enough to deliver some fatal shots to Nam-Ek, however on his own he stands little chance
Tony blows his mask open and smokes him with his arsenal
How? The kryptonian metal used on their armor literally took no damage throughout the entire movie. The masks were only broken when they were in the "forcefield" form and had the metal piece down. Nam-ek doesn't have the forcefield on his mask/helmet. There's no way his mask is being broken by Iron man.
Iron Man wins easily...Building size spaceship>train.
Those feats are way to different to say that. First of all Iron Man was pushing the thing downwards, whereas Nam-ek actually threw a train 100's of meters accurately. Also Titan had significantly less gravity than Earth so that spaceship or whatever it was wouldn't weigh as much. How does Iron Man bypass Nam-ek's armor?
Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.
Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.
It's not close.
You know, if you want to vote against someone, more power to you, but why do you feel the need to lie about things that are right there on screen for people to see?
Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.
It's not close.
You know, if you want to vote against someone, more power to you, but why do you feel the need to lie about things that are right there on screen for people to see?
Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.
It's not close.
You know, if you want to vote against someone, more power to you, but why do you feel the need to lie about things that are right there on screen for people to see?
I'm not going to entertain your jokes.
When I tell a joke, I'll be sure to remember that. Until then, the fact remains that you outright lied in your post.
Easily Nam-Ek , first he is a kryptonian exposed to yellow sun so he retains strength almost similar to superman, then he is arguably the top soldier in the Kryptonian army next to Faora , then remember Nam-Ek is the BIGGEST kryptonian so because of his size difference he is theoretically supposed to be stronger than superman because is Taller and Bigger mass wise, plus he has an armor that was shown can take brutal punishment. Nam-EK 6/10 & maybe ever 7/10
Nam Ek. His sheer combat speed, Kryptonian durability, and strength will be more than enough to catch Tony in a much easier fashion than Thanos did with a blow to incap him.
Iron Man. Namek wasn't really that impressive. And Tony is packing far more firepower than he has ever faced, whereas Namek will struggle to put him down.
Iron Man. Namek wasn't really that impressive. And Tony is packing far more firepower than he has ever faced, whereas Namek will struggle to put him down.
Nam-Ek was tanking punches from Superman lmfaooooo what are you smoking? a couple of repulsor cannons and baby rockets gonna even put a dent in Nam-Ek's armor?
@darkonast: Tanking is just not true, he was getting his ass beaten most of the time. Also Namek go his shit pushed in by an A10. How do you think he is going to hold up against Tony's firepower? Not well. Plus none of his striking feats showed enough power to put IM down.
@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally
@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally
Lmao, first off, what you stated "nam ek is physically stronger than clark" is not supported at all in the movie. Second of all, your reasoning for it "as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian" is faulty reasoning as, in comics and comic book movies, size does not mean power. There are many times when a smaller character is more powerful than a larger character. Third, it's behemoth, not behemot.
@darkonast: Tanking is just not true, he was getting his ass beaten most of the time. Also Namek go his shit pushed in by an A10. How do you think he is going to hold up against Tony's firepower? Not well. Plus none of his striking feats showed enough power to put IM down.
did it kill him? , tony can fire all he wants , Nam-Ek wont die , to this day , the only way they defeated him was sending him to the phantom zone
@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally
Lmao, first off, what you stated "nam ek is physically stronger than clark" is not supported at all in the movie. Second of all, your reasoning for it "as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian" is faulty reasoning as, in comics and comic book movies, size does not mean power. There are many times when a smaller character is more powerful than a larger character. Third, it's behemoth, not behemot.
sorry but this theory only works when 2 individuals are of different races or different powersets, Nam-EK and clark are both kryptonians , Nam-Ek also is a hybrid of the strongest and most dangerous species on Krypton , so yes Nam-Ek is physically stronger than Clark, clark just has a wider array of powers that made him better
@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally
Lmao, first off, what you stated "nam ek is physically stronger than clark" is not supported at all in the movie. Second of all, your reasoning for it "as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian" is faulty reasoning as, in comics and comic book movies, size does not mean power. There are many times when a smaller character is more powerful than a larger character. Third, it's behemoth, not behemot.
sorry but this theory only works when 2 individuals are of different races or different powersets, Nam-EK and clark are both kryptonians , Nam-Ek also is a hybrid of the strongest and most dangerous species on Krypton , so yes Nam-Ek is physically stronger than Clark, clark just has a wider array of powers that made him better
That is absolutely false. Kryptonians themselves, like Humans, have shown that they are not exactly alike in strengths, skills, abilities, intelligence...etc. Fact is, the movie showed that Nam-Ek was NOT stronger than Clark, period.
@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...
It's not an assumption. Did you watch the movie? They directly address the gravity and then proceed to show Mantis jumping super high denoting the low gravity. Happens as soon as they get on Titan. Also when Spider-man is saving them all catching them in the air you can see them falling slowly.
@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...
It's not an assumption. Did you watch the movie? They directly address the gravity and then proceed to show Mantis jumping super high denoting the low gravity. Happens as soon as they get on Titan. Also when Spider-man is saving them all catching them in the air you can see them falling slowly.
also when thanos fights strange you can see large boulder floating in the air.
@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...
It's not an assumption. Did you watch the movie? They directly address the gravity and then proceed to show Mantis jumping super high denoting the low gravity. Happens as soon as they get on Titan. Also when Spider-man is saving them all catching them in the air you can see them falling slowly.
also when thanos fights strange you can see large boulder floating in the air.
And it also was not a universal thing. In other words, there were spots on the planet that had low gravity, but it wasn't spread across the whole planet. Where Thanos was actually fighting most of them, there was zero evidence of low gravity.
Log in to comment