Avatar image for deactivated-5bdcbb8da1d15
#1 Posted by deactivated-5bdcbb8da1d15 (5093 posts) - - Show Bio
No Caption Provided

VERSUS

No Caption Provided

  • Morals Off
  • Fight to K.O. or Death
  • Fight Takes Place in Manhattan
Avatar image for sy8000
#2 Posted by Sy8000 (35483 posts) - - Show Bio

Eh, Iron Man.

Avatar image for oreoghoul
#3 Posted by Oreoghoul (1768 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man

Avatar image for DammeFavour
#4 Posted by DammeFavour (8466 posts) - - Show Bio

Still nam-ek, his armor healing factor won't save him from someone that matched superman

Avatar image for deactivated-5c830d4e319e6
#5 Posted by deactivated-5c830d4e319e6 (4952 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for deactivated-5ae89c5e2eb4b
#6 Edited by deactivated-5ae89c5e2eb4b (7 posts) - - Show Bio

damage control roll out

Avatar image for deactivated-5c531e53b02be
#7 Posted by deactivated-5c531e53b02be (3640 posts) - - Show Bio

Ironman I doubt namek has the output to kill Tony.

Avatar image for rem
#8 Posted by rem (2742 posts) - - Show Bio

Nam ek stomps. He could easily speed bloyz him. And Nothing iron man has done can match nam eks damage output.

Im so sick of this mcu wank recently

Avatar image for georgewbush
#9 Posted by GeorgeWBush (12201 posts) - - Show Bio

Tony blows his mask open and smokes him with his arsenal

Avatar image for xzone
#10 Posted by xZone (10347 posts) - - Show Bio

Tony wins this.

Avatar image for amonfire1776
#11 Posted by Amonfire1776 (3142 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man wins easily...Building size spaceship>train.

Avatar image for nfactor1995
#12 Posted by nfactor1995 (12941 posts) - - Show Bio

Nam-Ek decisively

Avatar image for deactivated-5c8fd6cb3e4f4
#13 Posted by deactivated-5c8fd6cb3e4f4 (18365 posts) - - Show Bio

Tony blows his mask open and smokes him with his arsenal

Avatar image for starstrikesun
#14 Posted by StarStrikeSun (16 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man definetely has what it takes to put Nam Ek down considering Hulk could't dent Thanos and Iron Man managed to scratch him. However Thanos is a very large, slow moving target compared to Nam-Ek and Tony needed massive help to get close enough to deliver those shots. Iron Man couldn't even beat Obsidian Cull with the help of Spider Man and Nam-eK is literally Obsidian Cull with super speed.

If Iron Man had prep and assitance he could be able to get close enough to deliver some fatal shots to Nam-Ek, however on his own he stands little chance

Avatar image for mazahs117
#15 Posted by MAZAHS117 (12747 posts) - - Show Bio
Avatar image for greysentinel365
#16 Posted by Greysentinel365 (6312 posts) - - Show Bio

Namek

Avatar image for crunch5481
#17 Posted by Crunch5481 (1167 posts) - - Show Bio

@georgewbush said:

Tony blows his mask open and smokes him with his arsenal

How? The kryptonian metal used on their armor literally took no damage throughout the entire movie. The masks were only broken when they were in the "forcefield" form and had the metal piece down. Nam-ek doesn't have the forcefield on his mask/helmet. There's no way his mask is being broken by Iron man.

Avatar image for crunch5481
#18 Edited by Crunch5481 (1167 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man wins easily...Building size spaceship>train.

Those feats are way to different to say that. First of all Iron Man was pushing the thing downwards, whereas Nam-ek actually threw a train 100's of meters accurately. Also Titan had significantly less gravity than Earth so that spaceship or whatever it was wouldn't weigh as much. How does Iron Man bypass Nam-ek's armor?

Avatar image for thebestofthebest
#19 Posted by ThEBeStOfTheBeST (11906 posts) - - Show Bio

Going with Namek.

Avatar image for worldofthunder
#20 Posted by Worldofthunder (5125 posts) - - Show Bio

Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.

It's not close.

Avatar image for thunderprince
#21 Posted by ThunderPrince (7096 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron-man wins.

Avatar image for carlosss14
#22 Posted by carlosss14 (516 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron man loses✊🏾

Avatar image for rr79
#23 Posted by RR79 (6761 posts) - - Show Bio

Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.

It's not close.

You know, if you want to vote against someone, more power to you, but why do you feel the need to lie about things that are right there on screen for people to see?

Avatar image for batman242
#24 Posted by Batman242 (12051 posts) - - Show Bio

I see Tony winning if he fights as smart as he did with Thanos.

Avatar image for marvelanddcfan24
#25 Posted by MarvelandDCfan24 (7553 posts) - - Show Bio

Tony got rektd NY Cul who Nam Ek would destroy

Avatar image for worldofthunder
#26 Posted by Worldofthunder (5125 posts) - - Show Bio

@rr79 said:
@worldofthunder said:

Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.

It's not close.

You know, if you want to vote against someone, more power to you, but why do you feel the need to lie about things that are right there on screen for people to see?

I'm not going to entertain your jokes.

Avatar image for rr79
#27 Posted by RR79 (6761 posts) - - Show Bio

@rr79 said:
@worldofthunder said:

Nam-Ek wrecks. Tony couldn't even do any damage to someone who got knocked down by BLACK PANTHER and almost taken out by SPIDERMAN. Tony stands no chance here, nothing he has can hurt Nam-Ek. Nam-Ek can tear the suit apart with his bare hands.

It's not close.

You know, if you want to vote against someone, more power to you, but why do you feel the need to lie about things that are right there on screen for people to see?

I'm not going to entertain your jokes.

When I tell a joke, I'll be sure to remember that. Until then, the fact remains that you outright lied in your post.

Avatar image for faradaysloth
#28 Posted by FaradaySloth (10083 posts) - - Show Bio

Nam-ek 6/10

Avatar image for darkonast
#29 Posted by darkonast (776 posts) - - Show Bio

Easily Nam-Ek , first he is a kryptonian exposed to yellow sun so he retains strength almost similar to superman, then he is arguably the top soldier in the Kryptonian army next to Faora , then remember Nam-Ek is the BIGGEST kryptonian so because of his size difference he is theoretically supposed to be stronger than superman because is Taller and Bigger mass wise, plus he has an armor that was shown can take brutal punishment. Nam-EK 6/10 & maybe ever 7/10

Avatar image for pansito
#30 Posted by pansito (1232 posts) - - Show Bio

nam ek

Avatar image for amcu
#31 Posted by Amcu (16930 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man.

Avatar image for noone1996
#32 Edited by Noone1996 (11859 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man wins handily.

Avatar image for imagein
#33 Posted by imagein (889 posts) - - Show Bio

Nam Ek. His sheer combat speed, Kryptonian durability, and strength will be more than enough to catch Tony in a much easier fashion than Thanos did with a blow to incap him.

Avatar image for man_of_miracles
#34 Posted by Man_of_Miracles (3551 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man. Namek wasn't really that impressive. And Tony is packing far more firepower than he has ever faced, whereas Namek will struggle to put him down.

Avatar image for archangel01
#35 Posted by Archangel01 (1995 posts) - - Show Bio

Cant see tony even hurting Nam Ek

Avatar image for darkonast
#36 Posted by darkonast (776 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man. Namek wasn't really that impressive. And Tony is packing far more firepower than he has ever faced, whereas Namek will struggle to put him down.

Nam-Ek was tanking punches from Superman lmfaooooo what are you smoking? a couple of repulsor cannons and baby rockets gonna even put a dent in Nam-Ek's armor?

Avatar image for man_of_miracles
#37 Posted by Man_of_Miracles (3551 posts) - - Show Bio

@darkonast: Tanking is just not true, he was getting his ass beaten most of the time. Also Namek go his shit pushed in by an A10. How do you think he is going to hold up against Tony's firepower? Not well. Plus none of his striking feats showed enough power to put IM down.

Avatar image for archangel01
#38 Posted by Archangel01 (1995 posts) - - Show Bio

@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally

Avatar image for rr79
#39 Posted by RR79 (6761 posts) - - Show Bio

@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally

Lmao, first off, what you stated "nam ek is physically stronger than clark" is not supported at all in the movie. Second of all, your reasoning for it "as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian" is faulty reasoning as, in comics and comic book movies, size does not mean power. There are many times when a smaller character is more powerful than a larger character. Third, it's behemoth, not behemot.

Avatar image for thetruthiii
#40 Posted by TheTruthIII (3316 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man beats any MoS Kryptonian except arguably Zod

Avatar image for darkonast
#41 Posted by darkonast (776 posts) - - Show Bio

@darkonast: Tanking is just not true, he was getting his ass beaten most of the time. Also Namek go his shit pushed in by an A10. How do you think he is going to hold up against Tony's firepower? Not well. Plus none of his striking feats showed enough power to put IM down.

did it kill him? , tony can fire all he wants , Nam-Ek wont die , to this day , the only way they defeated him was sending him to the phantom zone

Avatar image for apex_pretador
#42 Posted by APEX_pretador (20993 posts) - - Show Bio

Stark

Avatar image for darkonast
#43 Posted by darkonast (776 posts) - - Show Bio

@rr79 said:
@archangel01 said:

@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally

Lmao, first off, what you stated "nam ek is physically stronger than clark" is not supported at all in the movie. Second of all, your reasoning for it "as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian" is faulty reasoning as, in comics and comic book movies, size does not mean power. There are many times when a smaller character is more powerful than a larger character. Third, it's behemoth, not behemot.

sorry but this theory only works when 2 individuals are of different races or different powersets, Nam-EK and clark are both kryptonians , Nam-Ek also is a hybrid of the strongest and most dangerous species on Krypton , so yes Nam-Ek is physically stronger than Clark, clark just has a wider array of powers that made him better

Avatar image for rr79
#44 Posted by RR79 (6761 posts) - - Show Bio

@rr79 said:
@archangel01 said:

@man_of_miracles: nam ek is physically stronger than clark as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian Joe in their most of the fight, nam ek was toying with Clark even if tony damages his mask which means you have a 10 feet fully adapted kryptonian behemot who would rip tony in two...literally

Lmao, first off, what you stated "nam ek is physically stronger than clark" is not supported at all in the movie. Second of all, your reasoning for it "as he is 10 feet tall kryptonian behemot whereas clark is an avarage 6 feet kryptonian" is faulty reasoning as, in comics and comic book movies, size does not mean power. There are many times when a smaller character is more powerful than a larger character. Third, it's behemoth, not behemot.

sorry but this theory only works when 2 individuals are of different races or different powersets, Nam-EK and clark are both kryptonians , Nam-Ek also is a hybrid of the strongest and most dangerous species on Krypton , so yes Nam-Ek is physically stronger than Clark, clark just has a wider array of powers that made him better

That is absolutely false. Kryptonians themselves, like Humans, have shown that they are not exactly alike in strengths, skills, abilities, intelligence...etc. Fact is, the movie showed that Nam-Ek was NOT stronger than Clark, period.

Avatar image for amonfire1776
#45 Posted by Amonfire1776 (3142 posts) - - Show Bio

@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...

Avatar image for supermanforever
#46 Posted by Supermanforever (8541 posts) - - Show Bio

@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...

yeah because things floating in the air is not proof of low gravity.

Avatar image for crunch5481
#47 Posted by Crunch5481 (1167 posts) - - Show Bio

@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...

It's not an assumption. Did you watch the movie? They directly address the gravity and then proceed to show Mantis jumping super high denoting the low gravity. Happens as soon as they get on Titan. Also when Spider-man is saving them all catching them in the air you can see them falling slowly.

Avatar image for supermanforever
#48 Posted by Supermanforever (8541 posts) - - Show Bio

@amonfire1776 said:

@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...

It's not an assumption. Did you watch the movie? They directly address the gravity and then proceed to show Mantis jumping super high denoting the low gravity. Happens as soon as they get on Titan. Also when Spider-man is saving them all catching them in the air you can see them falling slowly.

also when thanos fights strange you can see large boulder floating in the air.

Avatar image for rr79
#49 Posted by RR79 (6761 posts) - - Show Bio

@crunch5481 said:
@amonfire1776 said:

@crunch5481: Proof of less gravity? That is a strong assumption...

It's not an assumption. Did you watch the movie? They directly address the gravity and then proceed to show Mantis jumping super high denoting the low gravity. Happens as soon as they get on Titan. Also when Spider-man is saving them all catching them in the air you can see them falling slowly.

also when thanos fights strange you can see large boulder floating in the air.

And it also was not a universal thing. In other words, there were spots on the planet that had low gravity, but it wasn't spread across the whole planet. Where Thanos was actually fighting most of them, there was zero evidence of low gravity.

Avatar image for darkpsychiclord_prime
#50 Posted by DarkPsychicLord_Prime (4115 posts) - - Show Bio

Iron Man in a good fight, Nam Ek can't put him down.