@lilbroomstick: You should tag me if you're responding to me, I only saw your post thanks to Noone.
Secondary adamantium seems plausible although you do realize all the things you just mentioned usually take extreme effort when he actually does break them? He usually can't even break this stuff without the Odinforce. The doesn't really consistently break them without any kind of amp.
Thor with Odinforce could break Cap's shield, which is >>>> adamantium. Hulk and Thor have both broken/damaged secondary adamantium on multiple occasions without any type of power ups.
Endo-sym was very explicitly shown and stated to be more powerful than the classic armors(ignoring the subtle hints and direct comparisons made with extremis, Bleeding edge, and Model Prime).
Like I said, I wouldn't hold much stock in those statements and scaling. Whenever classic armors show up in modern comics, they are nowhere near as powerful as they were back when they were Tony's main armor. Heck, in Fraction's run when Tony had to keep downgrading, most of the really classic armors were portrayed as like street level, being one-shot by rocket launchers and stuff. Writers tend to show Tony's upgrades with every armor iteration by retroactively making previous armors worse, not power creeping Tony every time.
Pretty much everytime Tony makes a powerful new armor they show it's better one way or another.
They try to, but in terms of overall feats, most armors are all at the same level. I'd say the only armors which are truly above any other Iron Man armors are Extremis and Bleeding Edge - Superior is arguable.
He has like 2 and five half wins against Hulk/Thor specifically but if you're counting other people then he stalemated Silver Surfer, had an inconclusive sonic boom causing fight with him another time, stalemated Hercules, showed up the fantastic four multiple times and beats Namor pretty much everytime(including non classic armors too)
IIRC, Tony has a total of one win against Hulk. Which happened like 40 years ago and almost killed Tony. I don't recall him truly getting any other wins or stalemates against Thor, Hulk, or Herc. I know he's also definitely been on the losing end of at least a few fights with Namor, though I would say he's consistently above Namor due to his versatility.
Are we going to act like Thor didn't get taken out in the same amount of hits by Taurus? Iron Man was actually more impressive than Thor in that fight considering he only got one surprised attack in while Iron Man had landed hits on a ready Taurus. Not to mentioned he lasted longer in the fight.
But Thor's one hit did a lot more damage... Tony's hits didn't really do any notable damage. Tony did get more hits in but did way less damage and also got taken out far quicker. Thor got hit like 4 times and was KOd for 5 minutes, Tony got hit twice and was out for hours.
I disagree on the Worthy Grey Gargoyle statement since the only time I can remember Thor no-selling Tony's blows and beating Iron Man anyway near as bad was when Extremis fought and took several hits from Odinforce Thor. The amped Thing had got oneshotted by Thor and slightly beaten up Spider-Man so I'd say Worthy Grey Gargoyle was more impressive by comparison.
Grey Gargoyle < Thing. If they both get an equal amp, amped Grey Gargoyle is still going to be weaker than amped Thing. You can't seriously be saying Grey Gargoyle with a hammer is better than Thor... The reason Thor never messes up Tony that badly is because he's never truly tried to kill Tony, not even in that fight you were talking about. Odinforce Thor could have vaporized Tony with a hit if he wanted Tony dead.
I do agree with Pymtron being weaker but the go into the sun comparison doesn't necessarily make him weaker. Iceman could be afraid to go into the sun even though say Human Torch can lol. Does that make him weaker than Torch?
False equivalence, neither Johnny nor Bobby are durable - they just have specific powers. Thor and Ultron actually have durability which can be compared. Although Pymtron wrecked the Hulkbuster anyways.
The other Hulkbusters here are ther Argonaut Hulkbuster, "Hulked-out" Endo-sym, and Model Prime Hulkbuster. Endo-sym scales over the other the strongest known Hulkbuster(World War Hulkbuster) by feats while the argonaut would be the strongest by implied power. That's why it felt unnecessary to make it a composite Hulkbuster.
I guess the Endo-Sym Hulkbuster scaling is fair.
The asgardian crystal gave Thorbuster the majority of its power with it's own Odinforce. It was basically like if Iron Man(Thorbuster) gave Thor(King Thor) a good fight but eventually got overwhelmed by his lightning(Odinforce) and physical strikes. Even so, Thorbuster could still get power from Mjolnir here.
Nah, the asgardian crystal absorbed power from the actual Odinforce that Thor was using. Furthermore, Mjolnir doesn't have Odinforce. It has the Worthy enchantment from Odin, but not actual Odinforce.
I think his Satellites also vaporized an Ultimo that was no-selling Thor's blows.
Scans?
Bleeding edge is quite literally extremis 2.0 and it was shown to be such. It's literally one of the most direct armors that could be scaled off of here.
Scale Bleeding Edge off of what? Why does it need scaling when it has better feats than any other armors?
The nano Iron Men had multiplied inside of Fin Fang Foom and killed off the virus controlling him. I'm sure they could be used as some type of distraction at least.
Yeah, IDK how killing off a virus is going to do anything to Thor. Also, didn't Tony need help from that random scientist to control the nano Iron Men?
Holograms and camouflaging will make things difficult for Thor, and likely even give Tony the opportunity to come up with a plan.
Thor has AoE attacks...
I'm pretty sure Magneto has one of the most powerful shields in Marvel so the fact that Iron Man not only could burst them, not only hold his own, but actually punched a self-amped Magneto with enough force to BFR him is in impressive. That ability increases his physical strength and durability.
Magneto's durability is extremely inconsistent unless it's explicitly shown that he's using his shields like this. I don't think that was shown in that comic.
I was referring to the time Iron Man put his-self into a coma while greatly increasing his striking power by disabling his safety protocols to knock out Mindless Hulk when I said striking power. It seems like it would be a last resort kind of thing though.
IDK if that would be enough to take out Thor, though he would definitely be pretty badly hurt. Thor and Hulk are a lot more powerful nowadays than they were back in the Bronze Age.
All of the armors are powerful enough to Thor to make a big difference with stacked stats and power. It's not like it'll take you 100 Bleeding edge or Endo-sym Iron Men to get to Thor's level for example. By feats it would likely only take 2. Plus if they were all individually on Thor's level then it would obviously a stomp in favor of Tony.
What... It would probably take like at least 100 of those armors to get to Thor's level. At the end of the day, without relying on a bunch of inconsistent scaling, Iron Man's best durability and damage output feats are firmly around mountain to country level at best. That's where writers intend for his armors to be. On the other hand, Thor consistently has planetary level durability and damage output in terms of actual, quantifiable feats. That is far above anything Tony has shown.
I was just saying it could be an option. Tony's travel speed actually isn't too far off considering what he's done and who he's kept up with. Thor is obviously faster with dimensional travel but Tony wouldn't be far behind with warp speed and both speeds would be far too fast for just traveling to Sols hammer.
Tony does have the occasional good travel speed feats, but they're much rarer than Thor's speed feats. They also usually rely on scaling, while Thor has a lot more quantifiable FTL speed feats. I would say Thor can fly a lot faster than Tony.
Tony was right above the Dyson Sphere when the destruction happened(his ship gets destroyed because of this) and he literally was shown to be inside the blast not caring. It was like a more insane version of the time Extremis tanked 5 nukes.
I think you're talking about this, and I don't see any explosion or anything. It looks like the Dyson sphere just fell apart and Tony flew out of the wreckage. I don't think that's a feat.
The Genetic disruptor should partially work at least. Thor might still have his powers but his natural stats would be taken. Then again if we factor in Donald Blake it would be more complicated.
I don't think so. Tony tried to clone Thor and Ragnarok was nowhere near the same level as Thor. Thor is an inherently magical character, with the blood of a Skyfather and an Elder God. There's also the fact that even when depowered as Donald Blake, he's still able to have the full powers of Thor by touching Mjolnir. So I doubt a genetic disrupter would work on Thor.
You kind of do have a point but everything else was shown in the link I gave so I decided to use a new fight. If you actually look at Hulk's expressions you'll see he wasn't laughing off the blows and the fight ended with Hulk getting blasted away. Hulk broke Tony's armor with one attack and a squeeze but it's a lot less impressive for Hulk when you look at the context. Iron Man was low on power while Hulk had gained power and basically said he was angrier than ever. Iron Man was basically combatblitzing Hulk the whole fight..I already addressed why I don't need to specifically composite the classic armors. You can still have these fights since you're not satisfied with that one
Those fights are better, but Tony still doesn't really put a scratch on Hulk in either of those. He just keeps Hulk off balance with his superior speed.
It's not based on assumption when there's been actual evidence and direct comparisons. Nobody is going to believe that Bleeding edge and Endo-sym are weaker than Extremis(literally the older version of Bleeding edge and even without that Bleeding edge has better feats between the two) and the classic armors(literally shown to be weaker than Endo-sym; literally outperformed by Extremis).
No one would believe that because Bleeding Edge has better feats than those armors, as does Extremis and Endo-Sym. I would certainly say the classic armors are better than Model prime, Model 42, current armors, etc.
I feel like those feats kind of debunk all the statements about Iron Man not having the damage output to put down Hulk/Thor(Bleeding edge alone did well against both of them).
He's only put down Hulk one time back when Hulk was weaker and it nearly killed him to do that. I would say none of Tony's armors have the output to put down Hulk/Thor.
Fair enough on Absorbing Man though, to be fair Iron Man is pretty far away from street level(outside of MCU and Avengers Assemble where he's portrayed closer to Captain America level).
Tony isn't street level, that's why putting down Absorbing Man isn't impressive for him.
I actually did forget Tony had access to the negative zone. He should be able to defeat most opponents with a device to BFR people there.
So you're the OP, would you say BFR is allowed for a win? In that case, Tony wins or gets stalemated in the prep rounds (if Thor can summon planetary lightning to kill Tony before he's teleported away).
@blackspidey2099: Well Thor had his powers before he became worthy, so I don't think there's an immense connection with Mjolnir or magic. Even if it only partially depowered him I think it could make a difference. I don't see what makes Unworthy Thor that different from Ares. Even if he could only reduce Thor's physical stats, but not stop his lightning manipulation, he's got satellites for that too. Also, as much of a meme as his Hulk-Buster's are, the one he used in World War Hulk was actually really impressive and I'd argue that it could do really well against unworthy Thor. It's definitely capable of KO'ing him.
Yeah, but Donald Blake and Jane Foster and all of those people get Thor's powers from touching Mjolnir. The genetic disruptor can't make Thor unworthy. In terms of Unworthy Thor, I guess it could possibly reduce Thor's physical stats. IIRC, the weather manipulation satellites stopped Thor from controlling the weather on Earth, not from being able to generate his own lightning which he can also do.
As for the WWHbuster, I've used that feat before but a lot of Hulk debaters say Hulk was holding back against Tony (and everyone else except for Sentry) so you can't fully scale it's durability or striking force to WWH. I'm not too clear on that point myself though. Either way, I don't think the WWHbuster actually did any damage to Hulk, though it did take a solid few hits until Hulk dropped Avengers Tower on it. The only way it could put down Thor is if we used that scan as a way to scale its striking power as equal to WWH, but, like I said, I think that might be questionable.
Log in to comment