1 on 1, fight to the death, morals off, no prep time. Fight takes place in an empty Times Square and both characters are blood lusted.
Who would win and why?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Allow I believe Cyclops is seriously underrated on this board, Iron Man wins. He has so much more versatility offensively and defensively he'd be .
I dont think anyone is underplaying Cyclops at all. You said it yourself...Stark is the favorite. Dont have to give respect to both sides when it is a mismatch.
Iron Man wins, but it is not the mismatch the majority seem to think it is. An optic blast from a bloodlusted Cyclops is nothing to be scoffed at. He once hit Juggernaut with a blast "that could destroy a small planet". While this may be hyperbole from Cyc, I don't think it is totally unrealistic. Add this to the fact that Scott is a fine fighter and on-the-spot tactician who has faced much tougher enemies than Tony and it could be a good fight. His bloodlusted blast will give Tony a lot of trouble. Nevertheless, Iron Man has more going for him overall and wins here
@masteraction: Yeah, but both are bloodlusted. So, it will be pretty dang hard for Scott to draw a bead on him and land a direct hit. It could happen, but IM has enough defensive power to deter a few of those. And since its bloodlusted, I imagine that all tactical thought would go out the window for either character, and that plays right into Tony's hand...unplanned, non-tactical, imporvised combat with hightech weapons. Cyclops will not have the time to land enough solid hits to drop Stark. Stark can hit him with any number of weaponry his suit provides and one shot him.
And Cyclops destroying, even, an asteroid is unrealistsic...let alone a small planet.
Stark has every advantage here, and Scott has every disadvantage.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment